Rethinking Stability and Change in the Study of Organizational Routines: Difference and Repetition in a Newspaper-Printing Factory

References

• Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. Bijker W, Law J, eds. Shaping Technology/Building Society; Studies in Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 205–224.Google Scholar
• Atkinson P, Coffey A, Dlamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L (2001) Handbook of Ethnography (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4):643–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2008) Handbook of Organizational Routines (Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC, Lazaric N, Nelson RR, Winter SG (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):775–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Nicolini D, Langley A, Tsoukas H (2013) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg SR, Kornberger M, Rhodes C (2005) Learning/becoming/organizing. Organ. 12(2):147–167.Google Scholar
• Cohen M (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change 5(3):653–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooke FL (2000) Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: Some organisational barriers. Internat. J. Quality Reliability Management 17(9):1003–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costello N (2013) Stability and Change in High-Tech Enterprises: Organisational Practices in Small to Medium Enterprises (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. J. Institutional Econom. 7(2):197–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1325–1350.Link, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L, Pollock N (2014) Performing modularity: Competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organ. Stud. 35(12):1813–1843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delanda M (2005) Space: Extensive and intensive, actual and virtual. Buchanan I, Lambert G, eds. Deleuze and Space (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK), 80–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deleuze G (2004) Difference and Repetition (Continuum International Publishing Group, London).Google Scholar
• Duff C (2014) Assemblages of Health: Deleuze’s Empiricism and the Ethology of Life (Springer, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2008) Routine dynamics. Barry D, Hansen H, eds. The Sage Handbook of New Approaches to Organisation Studies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 302–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Rafaeli A (2002) Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. 39(3):309–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garfinkel H, Bittner E (1967) Good organizational reasons for bad clinic records. Garfinkel H, ed. Studies in Ethnomethodology (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 186–207.Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones G, McLean C, Quattrone P (2004) Spacing and timing. Organ. 11(6):723–741.Google Scholar
• Latour B (1996) On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt 47(4):369–381.Google Scholar
• Latour B (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30(2):225–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Latour B (2013) An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5(4):379–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Sciences Research (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Lazaric N (2000) The role of routines, rules and habits in collective learning: Some epistemological and ontological considerations. Eur. J. Econom. Social Systems 14(2):157–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J (2012) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linstead S, Thanem T (2007) Multiplicity, virtuality and organization: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organ. Stud. 28(10):1483–1501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLean C (2014) Potentialities and possibilities: Objects, memory and crystal images. Harvey P, Casella E, Evans G, Knox H, McLean C, Silva E, Thoburn N, Woodward K, eds. Objects and Materials (Routledge, London), 359–370.Google Scholar
• McLean C, Aroles J (2014) Making organizational facts, standards and routines: Tracing materialities and materialising traces. De Vaujany FX, Mitev N, Laniray P, Vaast E, eds. Materiality and Time: Historical Perspectives on Organizations, Artefacts and Practices (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK), 81–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLean C, Hassard J (2004) Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: Critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts. J. Management Stud. 41(3):493–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nag R, Corley KG, Gioia DA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Acad. Management J. 50(4):821–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Norman DA (2013) The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2010) Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaare E, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (1992) Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):527–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. 18(4):235–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Hærem T (2015) Organizational routines as patterns of action: Implications for organizational behavior. Annual Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2(1):465–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2010) Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 31(7):917–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2011) The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1369–1383.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quattrone P, Hopper T (2006) What is IT? SAP, accounting, and visibility in a multinational organization. Inform. Organ. 16(3):212–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D, Raymond B, Anderson C (2012) Theorizing information technology as a material artifact in information systems research. Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 217–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Rerup C (2010) Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Management 37(2):468–490.Google Scholar
• Suchman L (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Turner SF (2014) The temporal dimension of routines and their outcomes: Exploring the role of time in the capabilities and practice perspectives. Shipp AJ, Fried Y, eds. Time and Work: How Time Impacts Groups, Organizations and Methodological Choices (Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK), 115–145.Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.Link, Google Scholar
• van der Steen M (2011) The emergence and change of management accounting routines. Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. 24(4):502–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):539–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Womack J, Jones D, Roos D (1990) The Machine That Changed the World (Rawson Associates, New York).Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar