The Interplay of Reflective and Experimental Spaces in Interrupting and Reorienting Routine Dynamics

References

• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresman H (2013) Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Management J. 56(1):35–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2003) Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):321–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1325–1350.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Rafaeli A (2002) Organizatioanl rotuines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. 39(3):309–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamson WA (1996) Safe spaces and social movements. Perspectives Soc. Problems 8:27–38.Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(6):781–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Maguire S (2010) Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm convention. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1365–1392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendry J, Seidl D (2003) The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. J. Management Stud. 40(1):175–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Golden-Biddle K, Irwin J, Mao J (2011) Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organ. Sci. 22(2):522–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Molnár V (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Establishing trustworthiness. Lincoln YS, Guba EG, eds. Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, Newsbury Park, CA), 218–236.Google Scholar
• MacIntosh R, MacLean D, Seidl D (2010) The effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: Do strategy workshops produce strategic change? Golshorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Ciuchta MP, Gong Y (2008) Organizational routines and organizational learning. Becker MC, ed. Handbook of Organizational Routines (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA), 152–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2012) Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1571–1592.Link, Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of actions. Inform. Organ. 18(4):235–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 24(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Santi F (2014) Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):439–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo M-G, Creed WD (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):222–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Yanow D, Tsoukas H (2009) What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. J. Management Stud. 46(8):1339–1364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):189–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zilber TB (2011) Institutional multiplicity in practice: A tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1539–1559.Link, Google Scholar