Routines and Creativity: From Dualism to Duality

References

• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1997) Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. Calif. Management Rev. 40(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R (1999) Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Acad. Management J. 42(6):630–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Schatzel EA, Moneta GB, Kramer SJ (2004) Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quart. 15(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Molnár V (2012) Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Acad. Management J. 55(3):515–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4):643–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M, Zirpoli F (2009) Innovation routines—Exploring the role of procedures and stable behaviour patterns in innovation. Becker M, Lazaric N, eds. Organizational Routines: Advancing Empirical Research (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Catmull E (2014) Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Cohendet P, Llerena P, Simon L (2014) The routinization of creativity: Lessons from the case of a video-game creative powerhouse. J. Econom. Stat. 234(2–3):120–141.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2003) Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):321–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1325–1350.Link, Google Scholar
• Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R, Glynn MA, Kazanjian RK (1999) Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):286–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Hargadon AB (2006) Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organ. Sci. 17(4):470–483.Link, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Management J. 46(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feist GJ (1998) A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(4):290–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong CT (2006) The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(5):1016–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford CM, Gioia DA (2000) Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. J. Management 26(4):705–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Karnøe P (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 32(2):277–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson LL, Mathieu JE, Shalley CE, Ruddy TM (2005) Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Acad. Management J. 48(3):521–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) Organizational routines and performance feedback. Becker MC, ed. Handbook of Organizational Routines (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hales M, Tidd J (2009) The practice of routines and representations in design and development. Indust. Corporate Change 18(4):551–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamoche K, Cunha MP (2001) Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organ. Stud. 22(5):733–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner R (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Michel A (2014) The mutual constitution of persons and organizations: An ontological perspective on organizational change. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1082–1110.Link, Google Scholar
• Morse JM (2007) Sampling in grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Pluntke F (2006) Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 27(3):257–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. J. Inform. Organ. 18(4):235–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C (2003) The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution. J. Management Stud. 40(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawyer RK (2011) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2001) Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2014) How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Acad. Management J. 57(3):814–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Styhre A (2006) Organization creativity and the empiricist image of novelty. Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4): 685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5):567–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Fern MJ (2012) Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1407–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. 12(6):730–743.Link, Google Scholar
• Witt U (2009) Novelty and the bounds of unknowledge in economics. J. Econom. Methodology 16(4):361–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, George JM (2003) Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. Leadership Quart. 14(4–5):545–568.Crossref, Google Scholar