Generating Novelty Through Interdependent Routines: A Process Model of Routine Work

References

• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Agar MH (2008) The Professional Stranger, 2nd ed. (Emerald, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Kunda G (2001) Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. 12(1): 76–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Popular Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2): 315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Bradbury H, Lichtenstein BMB (2000) Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organ. Sci. 11(5):551–564.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4): 442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorizing the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5): 1325–1350.Link, Google Scholar
• Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2003) Pricing process as a capability: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Management J. 24(7): 615–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(2):281–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Essén A (2008) Variability as a source of stability: Studying routines in the elderly home care setting. Human Relations 61(11):1617–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2008) Routines dynamics. Barry D, Hansen H, eds. The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Organization and Management (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 302–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Rafaeli A (2002) Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. J. Management Stud. 39(3): 309–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Weeks JR (2002) Intraorganizational ecology. Baum JAC ed. A Companion to Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 75–97.Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, New York).Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• James W (1907) Pragmatism (The American Library, New York).Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ (1999) Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology. J. Vocational Behav. 55(2):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Michel A (2014) The mutual constitution of persons and organizations: An ontological perspective on organizational change. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1082–1110.Link, Google Scholar
• Narduzzo A, Rocco E, Warglien M (2000) Talking about routines in the field: The emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York), 27–50.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Østerlund C, Carlile PR (2005) Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. Inform. Soc. 21(2):91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville JA (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (2003) Conceptualizing and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Sci. 49(7):857–870.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (2011) The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: Comment on Felin and Foss. J. Inst. Econom. 7(2):279–293.Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Hærem T, Hillison D (2011) The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1369–1383.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1484–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Philips N, Lawrence TB (2012) The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organ. 10(3):223–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Van de Ven AH, Dooley KJ, Holmes ME (2000) Organizational Change and Innovation Processes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a sources of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2): 338–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spradley JP (1980) Participant Observation (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
• Stene EO (1940) An approach to a science of administration. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 34(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Rev. 45(2):55–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Fern MJ (2012) Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1407–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Vaughan D (1992) Theory elaboration: The heuristics of case analysis. Ragin CC, Becker HS, eds. What Is a Case: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 173–202.Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):991–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar