Always Playable: Recombining Routines for Creative Efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s Video Game Studio

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1062

References

  • Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Vol. 173 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker MC, Lazaric N, Nelson RR, Winter SG (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):775–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bilton C, Leary R (2002) What can managers do for creativity? Brokering creativity in the creative industries. Internat. J. Cultural Policy 8(1):49–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boltanski L, Thévenot L (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresman H (2013) Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Management J. 56(1):35–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callon M (1998) An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. Sociol. Rev. 46(S1):244–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callon M (2007) What does it mean to say that economics is performative. MacKenzie D, Muniesa F, Siu L, eds. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 311–357.Google Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Catmull E (2008) How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Cohen M (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohendet P, Simon L (2007) Playing across the playground: Paradoxes of knowledge creation in the video game firm. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):587–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohendet P, Llerena P (2008) The role of teams and communities in the emergence of organizational routines. Becker M, ed. Handbook of Organizational Routines (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 256–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coriat B, Dosi G (1998) Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the coevolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines. Chandler AD, Hagström P, Sölvell Ö, eds. The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization and Regions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 103–133.Google Scholar
  • Csíkszentmihályi M (1975) Beyond Boredom and Anxiety (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco), 1–231.Google Scholar
  • D’Adderio L (2001) Crafting the virtual prototype: How firms integrate knowledge and capabilities across organisational boundaries. Res. Policy 30(9):1409–1424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Adderio L (2003) Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):321–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artifacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res. Policy 37(5):769–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. J. Institutional Econom. 7(2):197–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1325–1350.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • D’Adderio L, Pollock N (2014) Performing modularity: Competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organ. Stud. 35(12):1813–1843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeFillippi R, Grabher G, Jones C (2007) Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):511–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deken F, Carlile PR, Berends JJ, Lauche K (2013) How routines afford and constrain the generation and incorporation of novelty. Presentation, 29th European Group of Organization Studies (EGOS) Colloquium, Brussels, Belgium, July 4–6, Montreal, Canada.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Worline MC, Frost PJ, Lilius J (2006) Explaining compassion organizing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):59–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duymedjian R, Rüling CC (2010) Toward a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organ. Stud. 31(2):133–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS (2004) Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. 15(3):295–309.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Worline M, Baker N, Lowerson V (2013) Routines, disruption and the temporalities of continuity. Presentation, European Group of Organization Studies (EGOS), Brussels, Belgium, July 5, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  • Gilson LL, Mathieu JE, Shalley CE, Ruddy TM (2005) Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 48(3):521–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobday M (2000) The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Res. Policy 29(7):871–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski PA, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Molin MJ (2003) Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 15(3):363–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2015) Truce breaking and remaking: The CEO’s role in changing organizational routines. Gavetti G, Ocasio W, eds. Cognition and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 32 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 1–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lazaric N, Denis B (2005) Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: The case of the introduction of ISO norms. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):873–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin K (1951) Field Theory in Social Science (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):760–776.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 1–338.Google Scholar
  • Moorman C, Miner AS (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):698–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narduzzo A, Rocco E, Warglien M (2001) Talking about routines in the field: The emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network. Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 27–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2008) Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. 18(4):235–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. MIS Quart. 37(1):221–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rouleau L, Balogun J (2011) Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. J. Management Stud. 48(5):953–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schreyögg G, Sydow J (2010) CROSSROADS—Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1251–1262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stake R (1995) The Art of Case Study Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Turner S, Rindova VP (2012) A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1):24–46.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van der Steen M (2009) Inertia and management accounting change: The role of ambiguity and contradiction between formal rules and routines. Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. 22(5):736–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss ZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 51(1):147–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG (2000) The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):981–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Yin RK (1993) Applications of Case Study Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zbaracki M, Bergen ME (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.