How Do Brokers Broker? Tertius Gaudens, Tertius Iungens, and the Temporality of Structural Holes

References

• Abraham MLB (2014) Understanding the conditions of bias: Essays on gender differences in evaluation outcomes across three empirical contexts. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity–bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, McEvily B, Rowley TJ (2012) Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23(2):529–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger CR, Calabrese RJ (1975) Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Comm. Res. 1(2):99–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L (1979) Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Soc. Networks 2(3):191–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Fernandez-Mateo I (2010) Relationship duration and returns to brokerage in the staffing sector. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1141–1158.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2006) UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2002) Bridge decay. Soc. Networks 24(4):333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2007a) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2007b) Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers and analysts. Acad. Management J. 50(1):119–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2010) Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(3):543–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Jannotta JE, Mahoney JT (1998) Personality correlates of structural holes. Soc. Networks 20(1):63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butts CT (2008) A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodology 38(1):155–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Landis B, Zhang Z, Anderson MH, Shaw JD, Kilduff M (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1243–1260.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1992) Filling in the blanks: A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55(2):118–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC, Romney KA, Freeman SC (1987) Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropology 89(2):310–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangestad SW, Snyder M (2000) Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psych. Bull. 126(4):530–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1(6):201–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Morris MW (2007) Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the “life of the party.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):558–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janicik GA, Larrick RP (2005) Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(2):348–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M (2010) Serendipity vs. strategy: A tale of two theories. Presentation, Intra-Organ. Networks Conf., April 10, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intra-firm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):407–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML (2007) Building bridges: The social structure of interdependent innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1):103–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16(1):183–210.Google Scholar
• Lippa R (1978) Expressive control, expressive consistency, and the correspondence between expressive behavior and personality. J. Personality 46(3):438–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long Lingo E, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius jungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D, Borgatti SP, Davis J (2014) Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. Brass DJ, Labianca G, Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40 (Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd., Bingley, UK), 135–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Kilduff M (2008) The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self monitoring origins of network brokerage. J. Appl. Psych. 93(5):1155–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J, Mannucci PV (2015) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print October 14, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ, Ryu S (2008) Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organ. Sci. 19(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Kleinbaum AM (2011) Matter over mind? Email data and the measurement of social networks. Connections 31(1):22–46.Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Conaldi G, Tonellato M, Lomi A (2014) Modeling relational events: A case study on an open source software project. Organ. Res. Methods 17(1):23–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Mol JM (2013) Short-and long-term stability in organizational networks: Temporal structures of project teams. Soc. Networks 35(4):528–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans RE, Zuckerman EW (2008) Why knowledge does not equal power: The network redundancy trade-off. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5):903–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera MT, Soderstrom SB, Uzzi B (2010) Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual. Rev. Sociol. 36:91–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins G (2013) A tutorial on methods for the modeling and analysis of social network data. J. Math. Psych. 57(6):261–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The effects of self monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):639–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Spiro ES, Acton RM, Butts CT (2013) Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks. Soc. Networks 35(1):130–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stovel K, Golub B, Milgrom EMM (2011) Stabilizing brokerage. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 108(4):21326–21332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organ. Sci. 23(2):492–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Uzzi B (2011) Human communication dynamics: A study of the agreement between self-reported and email derived social networks. PLoS One 6(11):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Soda G (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zwijze-Koning K, De Jong M (2005) Auditing information structures in organizations: A review of data collection techniques for network analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 8(4):429–453.Crossref, Google Scholar