Reducing Organizational Rule Breaking Through Task Variety: How Task Design Supports Deliberative Thinking

References

• Allport DA, Styles EA, Hsieh S (1994) Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Umilta C, Moscovitch M, eds. Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 421–452.Google Scholar
• Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM, Epley N, Eyre RN (2007) Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 136(4):569–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Issacharoff S, Camerer C (1995) Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1337–1343.Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Kobrynowicz D, Dinnerstein JL, Kampf HC, Wilson AD (1997) In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(6):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RE, Heatherton TF, Tice DM (1994) Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Control (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Tenbrunsel AE (2011) Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett RJ, Robinson SL (2000) Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3):349–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chance Z, Norton MI, Gino F, Ariely D (2011) Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(3):15655–15959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chugh D, Bazerman MH, Banaji MR (2005) Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. Moore DA, Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Bazerman MH, eds. Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York),74–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chugh D, Kern MC, Kim HY (2014) When personality matters: Cognitive load moderates the effect of personality on ethics. Working paper, New York University, Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cokely ET (2007) Adaptive mechanisms of superior judgment under uncertainty: Rational choices from simple heuristics and elaborative strategies. Working paper, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
• Cortina JM, Landis RS (2009) When small effects tell a big strory, and when large effect sizes don’t. Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ, eds. Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences (Routledge, New York), 287–308.Google Scholar
• Dahling JJ, Chau SL, Mayer DM, Gregory JB (2012) Breaking rules for the right reasons? An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. J. Organ. Behav. 33(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Milkman KL, Hofmann DA, Staats BR (2015) The impact of time at work and time off from work on rule compliance: The case of hand hygiene in health care. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):846–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai S, Kouchaki M (2016) Moral symbols: A necklace of garlic against unethical requests. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print January 5, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai SD, Kouchaki M (2015) Work-report formats and overbilling: How unit-reporting vs. cost-reporting increases accountability and decreases overbilling. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 130(September):79–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann KA, Samuels SM, Ross L, Bazerman MH (1997) Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(5):1061–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diemand-Yauman C, Oppenheimer DM, Vaughan EB (2011) Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition 118(1):111–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Armeli S, Rexwinkel B, Lynch PD, Rhoades L (2001) Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):42–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1976) Social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Soc. 2(August):335–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Caruso EM (2004) Egocentric ethics. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2):171–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F, Hulin CI, Gelfand MJ, Magley VJ (1997) Antecedents and consequents of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. J. Appl. Psych. 82(4):578–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Wiltermuth SS (2014) Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity. Psych. Sci. 25(4):973–981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Schweitzer ME, Mead NL, Ariely D (2011) Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):191–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant A (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):393–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Hofmann DA (2011) It’s not all about me: Motivating hand hygiene among health care professionals by focusing on patients. Psych. Sci. 22(12):1494–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Fried Y, Parker SK, Frese M (2010) Putting job design in context: Introduction to the special issue. J. Organ. Behav. 31(2–3):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1997) The steal motive: Managing the social determinants of employee theft. Giacalone RA, Greenberg J, eds. Antisocial Behavior in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 85–108.Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG (1980) The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. Amer. Psychologist 35(7):603–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin RW, Lopez YP (2005) “Bad behavior” in organizations: A review and typology for future research. J. Management 31(6):988–1005.Google Scholar
• Gunia BC, Wang L, Huang L, Wang J, Murnighan JK (2012) Contemplation and conversation: Subtle influences on moral decision making. Acad. Management J. 55(1):13–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psych. 60(2):159–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1980) Work Redesign (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Haidt J, Kesebir S (2010) Morality. SF, Gilbert D, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 797–832.Google Scholar
• Haley KJ, Fessler DMT (2005) Nobody’s watching?: Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution Human Behav. 26(3):245–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton R, Vohs KD, Sellier A-L, Meyvis T (2011) Being of two minds: Switching mindsets exhausts self-regulatory resources. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(1):13–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris J, Bromiley P (2007) Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. 18(3):350–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or diversity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser DJ, Schwarz N (2016) Attentive Turkers: Mturk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behav. Res. Methods 48(1):400–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford, New York).Google Scholar
• Hernandez I, Preston JL (2013) Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(1):178–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzberg F (1968) One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Bus. Rev. 46(1):53–62.Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Stetzer A (1996) A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Personnel Psych. 49(2):307–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan R (1973) Moral conduct and moral character: A psychological perspective. Psych. Bull. 79(4):217–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1332–1356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR (1991) The structure of work: Job design and roles. Dunnette MD, Hough LE, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed. (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 165–207.Google Scholar
• James W (1890) The Principles of Psychology (Dover, New York). [Reprint 1950].Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jersild AT (1927) Mental set and shift. Archives Psych. 89:5–89.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Frederick S (2005) A model of heuristic judgment. Holyoak K, Morrison R, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 267–293.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Keren G, Schul Y (2009) Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 4(6):533–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kidwell RE, Bennett N (1993) Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):429–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK (2010) Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E (2006) Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 314(5800):829–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornell N, Bjork RA (2008) Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psych. Sci. 19(6):585–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Gigerenzer G (2011) Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psych. Rev. 118(1):97–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP (2008) Debiasing. Koehler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 316–338.Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Burgess JRD, Kaiser RB, Atchley EK, James LR (2003) The restriction of variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organ. Res. Methods 6(1):80–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, Ramanujam R (2009) Selectivity in organizational rule violations. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):643–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Tetlock PE (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psych. Bull. 125(2):255–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindenberg S, Steg L (2007) Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. J. Soc. Issues 63(1):117–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods 7(1):83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin SR (2016) Stories about values and valuable stories: A field experiment of the power of narratives to shape newcomers’ actions. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1707–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AW, Lopez SH, Roscigno VJ, Hodson R (2013) Against the rules: Synthesizing types and processes of bureaucratic rule-breaking. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):550–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen V (1989) Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Res. Quart. Exercise Sport 60(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mead NL, Baumeister RF, Gino F, Schweitzer ME, Ariely D (2009) Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(3):594–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messick DM, Sentis KP (1979) Fairness and preference. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 15(4):418–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Chugh D, Bazerman MH (2009) How can decision making be improved? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 4(4):379–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(3):134–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore C, Gino F (2015) Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. Acad. Management Ann. 9(January):235–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Loewenstein G (2004) Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2006) Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. J. Management 32(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Strack F, Pfeiffer T (2000) Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26(9):1142–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osman M (2004) An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 11(6):988–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis P (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (2003) Conceptualizing and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Sci. 49(7):857–870.Link, Google Scholar
• Pérez-Peña R (2013) Students disciplined in Harvard scandal. New York Times (February 1), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/education/harvard-forced-dozens-to-leave-in-cheating-scandal.html.Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Dunham RB (1976) Task design: A literature review. Acad. Management Rev. 1(4):83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Miller DT (1992) When small effects are impressive. Psych. Bull. 112(1):160–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SJ, Leavitt K, DeCelles KA (2010) Automatic ethics: The effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 95(4):752–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson SL, Bennett RJ (1995) A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Acad. Management J. 38(2):555–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson SL, Bennett RJ (1997) Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes. Lewicki RJ, Bies RJ, Sheppard B, eds. Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Elsevier Science/JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 3–27.Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1934) Management and the Worker (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rosnow RL, Rosenthal R (2003) Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Canadian J. Experiment. Psych. 57(3):221–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy D (1959) Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE (2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 5(6):359–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sah S, Loewenstein G (2014) Nothing to declare: Mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest. Psych. Sci. 25(2):575–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salaz JJ (2002) The house rules: Autonomy and interests among service workers in the contemporary casino industry. Work Occupations 29(4):394–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott BA, Colquitt JA, Paddock EL (2009) An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: The role of managerial motives and discretion. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):756–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shallice T, Burgess P (1993) Supervisory control of action and thought selection. Baddeley A, Weiskrantz L, eds. Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 171–187.Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Eldar O, Bereby-Meyer Y (2012) Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psych. Sci. 23(10):1264–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shu LL, Gino F (2012) Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(6):1164–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1983) Reasons in Human Affairs (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6):1141–1159.Link, Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23(5):645–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor K, Rohrer D (2010) The effects of interleaved practice. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 24(6):837–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE (1998) Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Acad. Management J. 41(3):330–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (2004) Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behaviour. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2):223–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toplak M, West R, Stanovich K (2011) The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory Cognition 39(October):1275–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ (2006) Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. J. Management 32(6):951–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2005) Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1143–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vardi Y, Weiner Y (1996) Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organ. Sci. 7(2):151–165.Link, Google Scholar
• Vohs KD, Schooler JW (2008) The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psych. Sci. 19(1):49–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel W, Lakin JL, Shakarchi RJ (2005) Individual differences in motivated social cognition: The case of self-serving information processing. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31(10):1347–1357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenzel M (2005) Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. J. Econom. Psych. 26(6):862–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie JL, Johns G (1995) Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Acad. Management J. 38(5):1288–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhong C-B (2011) The ethical dangers of deliberative decision making. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar