Structural Disruption, Relational Experimentation, and Performance in Professional Hockey Teams: A Network Perspective on Member Change

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Alderfer CP (1977) Group and intergroup relations. Hackman JR, Suttle JL, eds. Improving Life at Work (Goodyear, Santa Monica, CA), 227–296.Google Scholar
• Allenby B, Fink J (2005) Toward inherently secure and resilient societies. Science 309(5737):1034–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Insko CA, Yovetich N, Romero AA (1995) Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 25(6):512–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow H, McGrath J, Berdahl J (2000) Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Arthur MB, Rousseau DM (1996) The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bavelas A (1950) Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 22(6):725–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, Okhuysen GA (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Hays N (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F (2010) The dynamics of interorganizational careers. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1034–1053.Link, Google Scholar
• Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1281–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom M (1999) The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Acad. Management J. 42(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc. Networks 28(4):466–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5): 1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon MD, Edmondson AC (2005) Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning 38(3):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley KM, Reminga J, Kamneva N (1998) Destabilizing terrorist networks. Institute for Software Research, Paper 45. Accessed December 8, 2016, http://repository.cmu.edu/isr/45.Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Barsade SG, Edmondson AC, Gibson CB, Krackhardt D, Labianca G (2015) The integration of psychological and network perspectives in organizational scholarship. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1162–1176.Link, Google Scholar
• Cascio W (2003) Changes in workers, work and organizations. Borman W, Ilgen D, Klimoski J, eds. Handbook of Psychology (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 401–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi H, Thompson L (2005) Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 98(2):121–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Cross R (2003) Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Soc. Networks 25(3):197–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day DV, Gordon S, Fink C (2012) The sporting life: Exploring organizations through the lens of sport. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1): 397–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duhatschek E (2014) Canadian hockey coach Babcock will continue to tinker. Globe and Mail (February 17), http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/olympics/canadian-hockey-coach-babcock-will-continue-to-tinker/article16920534/.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman PS, Garber S (1988) Absenteeism and accidents in a dangerous environment: Empirical analysis of underground coal mines. J. Appl. Psych. 73(1):81–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman PS, Leyden DP (1991) Familiarity and group productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 76(4):578–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould P, Gatrell A (1979) A structural analysis of a game: The Liverpool v Manchester United Cup Final of 1977. Soc. Networks 2(3):253–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Martorana PV, Fan ET (2000) What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):45–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan W (2003) From the help desk: Bootstrapped standard errors. Stata J. 3(1):71–78.Google Scholar
• Hackman J (1990) Groups That Work, and Those That Don’t (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hedberg BLT, Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (1976) Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(1):41–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB, McGrath JE, O’Connor KM (1993) Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Res. 24(3):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1950) The Human Group (Harcourt Brace & Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Hornby L (2010) Leafs shuffle lines in hopes of a spark. Toronto Sun (October 31), http://www.torontosun.com/sports/hockey/2010/10/31/15899721.html.Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Humphrey SE, Morgeson FP, Mannor MJ (2009) Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):48–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D (1994) Graphs and matrices. Wasserman S, Faust K, eds. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York), 92–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishak AW, Ballard DI (2012) Time to re-group: A typology and nested phase model for action teams. Small Group Res. 43(1):3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Borgatti SP (2011) Centrality-IS proficiency alignment and workgroup performance. MIS Quart.-Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1063–1078.Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Labianca GJ (2011) IS avoidance in health-care groups: A multilevel investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):504–522.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Ziegert JC, Knight AP, Xiao Y (2006) Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):590–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Porter LW (1985) When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayer’s attitudes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):242–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Porter LW (1986) The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. J. Appl. Psych. 71(1): 50–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee F (1997) When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 72(3):336–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee F, Edmondson AC, Thomke S, Worline M (2004) The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 15(3):310–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Leavitt HJ (1951) Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnormal Psych. 46(1):38–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2013) Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1414–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Belliveau M, Herndon B, Keller J (2007) Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Hollingshead AB (2007) Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. 18(1):147–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Masisak C (2013) Red Wings clicking after season of figuring identity. NHL.com (May 19), http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=671298.Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1991) Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Res. 22(2):147–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C, Miner AS (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):698–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Chung M-H, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. 47(6):860–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Labianca G, Chung M-H (2006) A multilevel model of group social capital. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):569–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Davis-Blake A (1986) Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Acad. Management J. 29(1):72–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao RD, Argote L (2006) Organizational learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and structure. Eur. Management Rev. 3(2):77–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Shah PP (2000) Network destruction: The structural implications of downsizing. Acad. Management J. 43(1):101–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw M (1964) Communication networks. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 111–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (1983) Organizations as action generators. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(1):91–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR (2012) Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Management J. 55(2):314–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D (1990) Work teams. Amer. Psychologist 45(2):120–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. 44(6):743–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S, Von Hippel E, Franke R (1998) Modes of experimentation: An innovation process—and competitive—variable. Res. Policy 27(3):315–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsvetovat M, Carley KM (2003) Bouncing back: Recovery mechanisms of covert networks. North Amer. Assoc. Comput. Soc. Organ. Sci. (NAACSOS) Conf. Proc., Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Tuckman B (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psych. Bull. 63(6):384–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R, Fisher CM, Hackman JR (2009) Leading teams when the time is right: Finding the best moments to act. Organ. Dynam. 38(3):192–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller MJ (1999) The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Acad. Management J. 42(2):127–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1998) Introductory essay—Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. 9(5):543–555.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2007) Managing the Unexpected (Wiley, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2000) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (South-Western, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TM (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziller RC (1965) Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psych. Bull. 64(3):164–182.Crossref, Google Scholar