Multilevel Organizational Adaptation: Scale Invariance in the Scottish Healthcare System

References

• Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. (2011) The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Anderson P (1999) Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 10(3):216–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Meyer A, Eisenhardt K, Carley K, Pettigrew A (1999) Applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organ. Sci. 10(3):233–236.Link, Google Scholar
• Andriani P, McKelvey B (2009) From Gaussian to Paretian thinking: Causes and implications of power laws in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):1053–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Repenning NP, Zuckerman EW (2010) Nasty, brutish, and short: Embeddedness failure in the pharmaceutical industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):472–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boisot M, Child J (1999) Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organ. Sci. 10(3):237–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J, Eisenhardt K, Bingham C (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Piezunka H (2011) Complexity theory and corporate strategy. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, London), 506–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eoyang G (2011) Complexity and the dynamics of organizational change. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, London), 317–332.Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Forrester JW (1971) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory Decision 2(2):109–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1022–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C, Drazin R (1997) Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):403–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, van Knippenberg D, Rast DEI (2012) Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):232–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Orlikowski WJ (2013) Temporal work in strategy making. Organ. Sci. 24(4):965–995.Link, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S, Levin S (1987) Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 128(1):11–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW (2000) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Dansereau F, Hall RI (1994) Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 19(2):195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Tosi H, Cannella Jr AA (1999) Multilevel theory building: Benefits, barriers, and new developments. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):248–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Dansereau F, Hall RJ, Sherman WS, Grant R, Fried Y (1995) On the level: Homogeneity, independence, heterogeneity, and interactions in organizational theory. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):7–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3):248–266.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Warglien M (1999) Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10(3):342–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Volberda HW (1999) Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5):519–534.Link, Google Scholar
• Liberman V, Samuels SM, Ross L (2004) The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(9):1175–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S, McKelvey B, Mirabeau L, Ötzas N (2006) Complexity science and organization studies. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed. (Sage, London), 165–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin de Holan P, Phillips N (2004) Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. 50(11):1603–1613.Link, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B (1997) Quasi-natural organization science. Organ. Sci. 8(4):352–380.Link, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B (1999) Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organ. Sci. 10(3):294–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu MC, Bauer RM (2004) On the relationship between organizational complexity and organizational structuration. Organ. Sci. 15(1):98–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Morel B, Ramanujam R (1999) Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organ. Sci. 10(3):278–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive (2005a) A National Framework for Service Change in the NHS in Scotland: Building a Health Service Fit for the Future (Scottish Executive, Edinburgh, Scotland).Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive (2005b) An Introduction to the Unscheduled Care Collaborative Programme (Scottish Executive, Edinburgh, Scotland).Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive (2006) Building the Foundations for Delivery: The First Year Progress Report of the Unscheduled Care Collaborative Programme (Scottish Executive, Edinburgh, Scotland).Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (Irwin McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2006) Learning from evidence in a complex world. Amer. J. Public Health 96(3):505–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D, Eisenhardt K (2012) Simple rules for a complex world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(9):68–74.Google Scholar
• Thietart A-R, Forgues B (2011) Complexity science and organization. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, London), 53–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organ. Sci. 22(1):60–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5):567–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Irwin McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar