It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives

References

• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D (2012) The personal sense of power. J. Personality 80(2):313–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anon (2015) HeForShe. Wikipedia, Free Encyclopedia. Accessed May 12, 2015, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HeForShe.Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Barton MA (2007) Identity-based issue selling. Bartel CA, Blader S, Wrzesniewski A, eds. Identity and the Modern Organization (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 223–244.Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Barton D, Devillard S, Hazlewood J (2015) Gender equality: Taking stock of where we are. McKinsey Quart. Accessed January 12, 2015, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/organization/gender_equality_taking_stock_of_where_we_are.Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2007) The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Acad. Management Perspect. 21(1):7–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter NC, Berry CM, Houston L (2014) A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 35(4):547–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming D, Leung TY, Rui O (2015) Gender diversity and securities fraud. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1572–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czopp AM, Monteith MJ (2003) Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(4):532–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czopp AM, Monteith MJ, Mark AY (2006) Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(5):784–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahling JJ, Wiley S, Fishman ZA, Loihle A (2016) A stake in the fight: When do heterosexual employees resist organizational policies that deny marriage equality to LGB peers? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 132(January):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dent EB, Goldberg SG (1999) Challenging “resistance to change.” J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 35(1):25–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donnelly K, Twenge JM, Clark MA, Shaikh SK, Beiler-May A, Carter NT (2015) Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psych. Women Quart. 40(1):41–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Effron DA, Miller DT (2015) Do as I say, not as I’ve done: Suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 131(November):16–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford JD, Ford LW, D’Amelio A (2008) Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):362–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gadiesh O, Coffman J (2010) Why workplace equality initiatives aren’t helping women. Harvard Business Review (February 5), https://hbr.org/2010/02/why-women-still-arent-equals-i.Google Scholar
• Glew DJ, O’Leary-Kelly AM, Griffin RW, Van Fleet D (1995) Participation in organizations: A preview of the issues and proposed framework for future analysis. J. Management 21(3):395–421.Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2014) Why so many men don’t stand up for their female colleagues. Atlantic (April 29), http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/04/why-men-dont-stand-up-for-women-to-lead/361231/.Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Rothbard NP (2013) When in doubt, seize the day? Security values, prosocial values, and proactivity under ambiguity. J. Appl. Psych. 98(5):810–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves C (2014) A letter to America’s CEOs: Gender parity is an economic imperative. Time (June 10), http://time.com/2850166/ogilvy-gender-imperative/.Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Connolly K (2013) Great leaders who make the mix work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(9):68–76.Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Kravitz DA, Mayer DM, Leslie LM, Lev-Arey D (2006) Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. J. Appl. Psych. 91(5):1013–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hideg I, Michela JL, Ferris DL (2011) Overcoming negative reactions of nonbeneficiaries to employment equity: The effect of participation in policy formulation. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):363–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Keats BW (1984) Empirical identification of the criteria for effective affirmative action programs. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 20(3):203–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(3):184–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Neely B, Emrich C, Griffiths D, George G (2015a) Gender research in AMJ: An overview of five decades of empirical research and calls to action. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1459–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Son J, Roh H (2015b) When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1516–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(4):589–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim T gyu, Hornung S, Rousseau DM (2011) Change-supportive employee behavior: Antecedents and the moderating role of time. J. Management 37(6):1664–1693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klaus P (2016) Sisterhood is not enough: Why workplace equality needs men, too. New York Times (August 13), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/jobs/sisterhood-is-not-enough-why-workplace-equality-needs-men-too.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Landis RS, Beal DJ, Tesluk PE (2000) A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods 3(2):186–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeanIn, McKinsey & Company (2016) Women in the workplace. Accessed March 10, 2017, https://womenintheworkplace.com/Women_in_the_Workplace_2016.pdf.Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Mayer DM, Kravitz DA (2014) The stigma of affirmative action: A stereotyping-based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Acad. Management J. 57(4):964–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh J-L (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lines R (2004) Influence of participation in strategic change: Resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement. J. Change Management 4(3):193–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lines R, Selart M (2013) Participation and organizational commitment during change. Leonard HS, Lewis R, Freedman AM, Passmore J, eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Leadership, Change, and Organizational Development (John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK), 289–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Personality Psych. 64(3):559–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manyika J, Madgavkar A, Woetzel J (2015) The power of gender parity. Huffington Post (September 24), http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/in_the_news/the_power_of_gender_parity.Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company (2015) A CEO’s guide to gender equality. McKinsey Quart. Accessed January 12, 2015, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/leading_in_the_21st_century/a_ceos_guide_to_gender_equality.Google Scholar
• Miller DT (1999) The norm of self-interest. Amer. Psych. 54(12):1053–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Effron DA (2010) Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. Zanna MP, Olson JM, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Elsevier, San Diego), 115–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Effron DA, Zak SV (2009) From moral outrage to social protest. Bobocel DR, Kay AC, Zanna MP, Olson JM, eds. The Psychology of Justice and Legitimacy: The Ontario Symposium (Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK), 103–124.Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2011a) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison KR (2011b) A license to speak up: Outgroup minorities and opinion expression. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 47(4):756–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2014) Employee voice and silence. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):173–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nesterkin DA (2013) Organizational change and psychological reactance. J. Organ. Change Management 26(3):573–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neubert M, Cady SH (2001) Program commitment: A multi-study longitudinal field investigation of its impact and antecedents. Personnel Psych. 54(2):421–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasmore WA, Fagans MR (1992) Participation, individual development, and organizational change: A review and synthesis. J. Management 18(2):375–397.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1546–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prime J, Moss-Racusin CA (2009) Engaging men in gender initatives: What change agents need to know. Accessed March 10, 2017, http://www.catalyst.org/system/files/Engaging_Men_In_Gender_Initiatives_What_Change_Agents_Need_To_Know.pdf.Google Scholar
• PWC (2016) Modern mobility: Moving women with purpose. Accessed March 10, 2017, http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/diversity-inclusion/assets/moving-women-with-purpose.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ratner RK, Miller DT (2001) The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Breitsohl H, Schröder M, Keating DJ (2016) Employee volunteering: A review and framework for future research. J. Management 42(1):55–84.Google Scholar
• Schoon R (2015) Diversity in tech: Microsoft announces “modest” progress, but female representation slips. Latin Post (November 24), http://www.latinpost.com/articles/97440/20151124/diversity-in-tech-microsoft-announces-modest-progress-over-last-year-but-female-representation-slipped.htm.Google Scholar
• Selig JP, Preacher KJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects. Accessed March 10, 2017, http://www.quantpsy.org/medmc/medmc.htm.Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Fong GT (2005) Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangirala S, Ramanujam R (2012) Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personality Psych. 65(2):251–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangirala S, Kamdar D, Venkataramani V, Parke MR (2013) Doing right versus getting ahead: The effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees’ voice. J. Appl. Psych. 98(6):1040–1050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Cummings LL, Parks JM (1995) Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Shaw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behaviors, Vol. 17 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 215–285.Google Scholar
• Wanberg CR, Banas JT (2000) Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warner J (2015) The women’s leadership gap: Women’s leadership by the numbers. (August 4), https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/04053151/WomensLeadershipUpdate-factsheet.pdf.Google Scholar
• Washington J, Evans NJ (1991) Becoming an ally. Evans NJ, Wall VA, eds. Beyond Tolerance: Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals on Campus (American College Personnel Association, Alexandria, VA),195–204.Google Scholar
• Wittenberg-Cox A (2014) How one law firm maintains gender balance. Harvard Business Review (May 27), https://hbr.org/2014/05/how-one-law-firm-maintains-gender-balance/.Google Scholar