Promoted Up But Also Out? The Unintended Consequences of Increasing Women’s Representation in Managerial Roles in Engineering

References

• Acker J (1998) The future of “gender and organizations”: Connections and boundaries. Gender, Work Organ. 5(4):195–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Chan C, DiBenigno J (2016) Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Management Ann. 1(10):183–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ, Bowles S, Durlauf SN (2000) Meritocracy and Economic Inequality (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashcraft KL (2013) The glass slipper: “Incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Acad. Management Rev. 39(1):6–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashcraft KL, Muhr SL, Rennstam J, Sullivan K (2012) Professionalization as a branding activity: Occupational identity and the dialectic of inclusivity-exclusivity. Gender, Work Organ. 19(5):467–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (1987) Experiencing technical work: A comparison of male and female engineers. Human Relations 40(5):299–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (1993) Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Beasley MA, Fischer MJ (2012) Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Soc. Psych. Ed. 15(4):427–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergmann BR (1974) Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by race or sex. Eastern Econom. J. 1(2):103–110.Google Scholar
• Bix AS (2014) Girls Coming to Tech! A History of American Engineering Education for Women (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau G, Lunz M (1998) Testing the incremental effect of professional commitment on intent to leave one’s profession beyond the effects of external, personal, and work-related variables. J. Vocational Behav. 52(2):260–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardador MT, Hill P (2016) Career paths in engineering firms: Gendered patterns and implications. J. Career Assessment, ePub ahead of print December 5, http://dx.doi.org/abs/10.1177/1069072716679987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cech EA (2013a) Ideological wage inequalities? The technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering. Soc. Forces 91(4):1147–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cech EA (2013b) The self-expressive edge of occupational sex segregation1. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(3):747–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cech EA, Blair-Loy M (2014) Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work Occupations 41(1):86–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cech EA, Rubineau B, Silbey S, Seron C (2011) Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):641–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacko TI (1982) Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects. J. Appl. Psych. 67(1):119–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan CK, Anteby M (2016) Task segregation as a mechanism for within-job inequality women and men of the transportation security administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):184–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charles M, Grusky DB (2004) Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen JM, Moons WG (2015) They won’t listen to me: Anticipated power and women’s disinterest in male-dominated domains. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 18(1):116–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen PN, Huffman ML (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S (2006) Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, eds. Social Psychology of the Workplace. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 23 (Elsevier, New York), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotter DA, Hermsen JM, Ovadia S, Vanneman R (2001) The glass ceiling effect. Soc. Forces 80(2):655–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawski B, SeVon G (2008) The think edge of the wedge: Foreign women professors as double strangers in academia. Gender, Work Organ. 15(3):235–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F (2009) Inventing Equal Opportunity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Sutton JR, Meyer JW, Scott R (1993) Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(2):396–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doering MM, Rhodes SR (1989) Changing careers: A qualitative study. Career Development Quart. 37(4):316–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly A, Karau S (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Makhijani MG, Klonsky BG (1992) Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 111(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W, Diekman AB (2000) Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. Eckes T, Trautner HM, eds. The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (Psychology Press, New York), 123–174.Google Scholar
• Eccles J (1987) Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psych. Women Quart. 11(2):135–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles J (1994) Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psych. Women Quart. 18(4):585–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles J (2007) Where are all the women? Ceci SJ, Williams WM, eds. Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Sciences and Engineering (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 199–209.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (1991) Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. Cooper CL, Robertson IT, eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 6 (John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK), 283–357.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories from case research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1994) The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):203–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1995) The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Acad. Management J. 38(3):589–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P (1982) The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation. J. Human Resources 17(3):358–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkner W (2000) Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Soc. Stud. Sci. 30(5):759–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R (1987) Men, women, and the presumed persistence gap: A normative alternatives approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1118–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher JK (1999) Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fouad NA, Singh R, Fitzpatrick ME, Liu JP (2012) Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering. Report, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
• Fox MF (2006) Gender, hierarchy, and science. Chafetz JS, ed. Handbook of the Sociology of Gender (Springer, New York), 441–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frome PM, Alfeld CJ, Eccles JS, Barber BL (2006) Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Res. Evaluation 12(4):359–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gale A, Cartwright S (1995) Women in project management: Entry into a male domain? A discussion on gender and organizational culture-part 1. Leadership Organ. Development J. 16(2):3–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaucher D, Friesen J, Kay AC (2011) Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(1):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(4):702–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH, Kmec J (2009) Hierarchical rank and women’s organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(5):1428–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Management Rev. 10(1):76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross E (1968) The sexual structure of occupations over time. Soc. Problems 16(2):198–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Brief AP, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 32 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Parks-Stamm EJ (2007) Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. Correll SJ, ed. Social Psychology of Gender. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 24 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Block CJ, Lucas JA (1992) Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. J. Appl. Psych. 77(4):536–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, McCullough WF, Gilbert D (1996) The other side of affirmative action: Reactions of nonbeneficiaries to sex-based preferential selection. J. Appl. Psych. 81(4):346–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Simon MC, Repper DP (1987) Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations. J. Appl. Psych. 72(1):62–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesketh B, Gardner D, Lissner D (1992) Technical and managerial career paths: An unresolved dilemma. Internat. J. Career Management 4(3):9–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlett SA, Luce CB, SerVon LJ, Sherbin L, Shiller P, Sosnovich E, Sumberg K (2008) The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering and Technology (Harvard Business Publishing, Brighton, MA).Google Scholar
• Hinze S (1999) Gender and the body of medicine or at least some body parts: (Re)constructing the prestige hierarchy of medical specialties. Sociol. Quart. 40(2):217–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochschild A, Machung A (2012) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Huffman ML, Cohen PN, Pearlman J (2010) Engineering change: Organizational dynamics and workplace gender desegregation, 1975–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):255–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA (1992) Women’s entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority, and values among salaried managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):282–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jagacinski CM (1987) Engineering careers: Women in a male-dominated field. Psych. Women Quart. 11(1):97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Sargeant A (1998) Motives for transition: An exploratory study of engineering managers. Human Resource Management J. 8(3):41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A (2014) By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):207–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Koenig AM, Eagly AH, Mitchell AA, Ristikari T (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psych. Bull. 137(4):616–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konrad AM, Gutek BA (1987) Theory and research on group composition: Applications to the status of women and ethnic minorities. Oskamp S, Spacapan S, eds. Interpersonal Processes (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 85–121.Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psych. 58(2):281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kvale S (1996) InterViews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Lauver KJ, Kristof-Brown A (2001) Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. J. Vocational Behav. 59(3):454–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemons MA, Parzinger M (2007) Gender schemas: A cognitive explanation of discrimination of women in technology. J. Bus. Psych. 22(1):91–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Heilman ME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):777–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Male SA, Bush MB, Murray K (2009) Think engineer, think male? Eur. J. Engrg. Ed. 34(5):455–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall C, Rossman GB (1999) Designing Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Maume DJ (1999) Glass ceilings and glass escalators occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work Occupations 26(4):483–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maume DJ (2004) Is the glass ceiling a unique form of inequality? Evidence from a random-effects model of managerial attainment. Work Occupations 31(2):250–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCall L (2001) Gender, Class and Race in the New Economy (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• McDonald TW, Toussaint LL, Schweiger JA (2004) The influence of social status on token women leaders’ expectations about leading male-dominated groups. Sex Roles 50(5–6):401–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF) (2015) Scientists, engineers, and technicians in the United States, 2001. Accessed May 8, 2017, https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20160210153913/http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05313/.Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Bridges W (1999) Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pazy A, Oron I (2001) Sex proportion and performance evaluation among high-ranking military officers. J. Organ. Behav. 22(6):689–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne DE (1988) Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences (State University of New York Press, Albany).Google Scholar
• Reskin BF (1993) Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Rev. Sociol. 19(1):241–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, Hartmann HI (1986) Women’s Work, Men’s Work: Sex Segregation on the Job (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, Roos PA (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Richman LS, vanDellen M, Wood W (2011) How women cope: Being a numerical minority in a male-dominated profession. J. Soc. Issues 67(3):492–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2009) Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender Soc. 23(2):145–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Erickson KG (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):579–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritter BA, Yoder JD (2004) Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psych. Women Quart. 28(3):187–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Hiring as cultural matching the case of elite professional service firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson JG, McIlwee JS (1991) Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociol. Quart. 32(3):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedge SK (1985) A comparison of engineers pursuing alternate career paths. J. Vocational Behav. 27(1):56–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhav Y (1992) Entrance of blacks and women into managerial positions in scientific and n engineering occupations: A longitudinal analysis. Acad. Management J. 35(4):889–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh R, Fouad NA, Fitzpatrick ME, Liu JP, Cappaert KJ, Figuereido C (2013) Stemming the tide: predicting women engineers’ intentions to leave. J. Vocational Behav. 83(3):281–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skaggs S (2008) Producing change or bagging opportunity? The effects of discrimination litigation on women in supermarket management. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(4):1148–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skaggs S, Stainback K, Duncan P (2012) Shaking things up or business as usual? The influence of female corporate executives and board of directors on women’s managerial representation. Soc. Sci. Res. 41(4):936–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
• Stainback K, Kwon S (2012) Female leaders, organizational power, and sex segregation. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):217–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stainback K, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2012) Documenting Desegregation: Racial and Gender Segregation in Private Sector Employment Since the Civil Rights Act (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Su R, Rounds J, Armstrong PI (2009) Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psych. Bull. 135(6):859–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A, Anteby M, Knight CR (2015) Concealable stigma and occupational segregation toward a theory of gay and lesbian occupations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):446–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ, Rivera KD (2010) Endorsing equity and applauding stay-at-home moms: How male voices on work-life reveal aversive sexism and flickers of transformation. Management Comm. Quart. 24(1):3–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treiman D, Hartmann H (1981) Women, Work and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Tremblay M, Wils T, Proulx C (2002) Determinants of career path preferences among Canadian engineers. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 19(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turco CJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):894–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White M, Hill S, McGovern P, Mills C, Smeaton D (2003) “High-performance” management practices, working hours and work–life balance. British J. Indust. Relations 41(2):175–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CL (1992) The Glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Soc. Problems 39(3):253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CL (1995) Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do “Women’s Work” (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar