The Effects of Corporate Venture Capital, Founder Incumbency, and Their Interaction on Entrepreneurial Firms’ R&D Investment Strategies

References

• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Garrido E, Dushnitsky G (2013) Publications and patents in corporate venture-backed biotech. Nat. Biotechnol. 31(6):495–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Garrido E, Dushnitsky G (2016) Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management J. 37(5):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD (2001) Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 19(1):2–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91(434):444–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arikan AM, Capron L (2010) Do newly public acquirers benefit or suffer from their pre-IPO affiliations with underwriters and VCs? Strategic Management J. 31(12):1257–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthurs JD, Busenitz LW (2003) The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(2):145–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker M, Gompers PA (2003) The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering. J. Law Econom. 46(2):569–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RA (2006) Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(1):104–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu S, Phelps C, Kotha S (2011) Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. J. Bus. Venturing 26(2):153–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger BD, Kosnik RD, Turk TA (1991) Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Acad. Management J. 34(1):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson D, Ziedonis RH (2009) Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organ. Sci. 20(2):329–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Benson D, Ziedonis RH (2010) Corporate venture capital and the returns to acquiring portfolio companies. J. Financial Econom. 98(3):478–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA, Means GC (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W, Karichalil R (2002) Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Acad. Management J. 45(4):818–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brander JA, Du Q, Hellmann T (2015) The effects of government-sponsored venture capital: International evidence. Rev. Finance 19(2):571–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardon MS, Foo MD, Shepherd D, Wiklund J (2012) Exploring the heart: Entrepreneurial emotion is a hot topic. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 36(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardon MS, Wincent J, Singh J, Drnovsek M (2009) The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):511–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Higgins MJ, Kang HD (2015) Corporate venture capital as a real option in the markets for technology. Working Paper 21424, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Fabrizio K (2011) How do product users influence corporate invention? Organ. Sci. 23(4):971–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur TJ, Loutskina E, Tian X (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(8):2434–2473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2002) Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(3):90–99.Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Certo ST, Hitt MA (2010) Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional owners on competitive actions. Acad. Management J. 53(4):723–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki D, Hottenrott H (2011) R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms. Small Bus. Econom. 36(1):65–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Draper NR, Smith H (1998) Applied Regression Analysis (John Willey & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005a) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management J. 26(10):947–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005b) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2006) When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):753–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shapira Z (2010) Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: Comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management J. 31(9):990–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach R (2009) Founder-CEOs, investment decisions, and stock market performance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 44(2):439–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2004) The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):501–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk MJ, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Stürmer T, Brookhart MA, Davidian M (2011) Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Amer. J. Epidemiology 173(7):761–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Meyer AD (2008) Crossing the organizational species barrier: How venture capital practices infiltrated the information technology sector. Acad. Management J. 51(5):976–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Hsu DH, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):750–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L, Fry AF, Myerson J (1994) Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psych. Sci. 5(1):33–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents—R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Grossman W (2002) Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Acad. Management J. 45(4):697–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayaraman N, Khorana A, Nelling E, Covin J (2000) CEO founder status and firm financial performance. Strategic Management J. 21(12):1215–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2003) A Guide to Econometrics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kim H, Lee PM (2008) Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organ. Sci. 19(3):404–418.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirby KN (1997) Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J. Experiment. Psych. General 126(1):54–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY (2006) Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1081–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Lerner J (2000) Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):674–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koskinen KU, Vanharanta H (2002) The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology companies. Internat. J. Production Econom. 80(1):57–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management 23(3):16–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lombardi C (2010) Cisco investing in smart grid start-up. (March 25), http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10470676-54.html.Google Scholar
• Mack A, Rock I (1998) Inattentional Blindness (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macmillan I, Roberts E, Livada V, Wang A (2008) Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) Seeking Innovation and Strategic Growth: Recent Patterns in CVC Mission, Structure, and Investment (National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD).Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neisser U (1967) Cognitive Psychology (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
• Nelson T (2003) The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management J. 24(8):707–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Gulati R (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. 39(5):1245–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2015a) Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):596–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC, McDonald R, Wang D, Hallen B (2015b) Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1334–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paik Y (2014) Serial entrepreneurs and venture survival: Evidence from U.S. venture-capital-financed semiconductor firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 8(3):254–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paik Y, Woo H (2014) Economic downturn and financing innovative startup companies. Management Decision Econom. 35(2):114–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Steensma HK (2012) When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management J. 33(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Steensma HK (2013) The selection and nurturing effects of corporate investors on new venture innovativeness. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(4):311–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy DK, Simon HA, Lave L (1998) Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 33(2):207–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh K, Mitchell W (2005) Growth dynamics: The bidirectional relationship between interfirm collaboration and business sales in entrant and incumbent alliances. Strategic Management J. 26(6):497–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SW, Shah SK (2013) Do innovative users generate more useful insights? An analysis of corporate venture capital investments in the medical device industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(2):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souder D, Simsek Z, Johnson SG (2012) The differing effects of agent and founder CEOs on the firm’s market expansion. Strategic Management J. 33(1):23–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Donald WKA, ed. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, New York),80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor J (2013) Corporate venture capital on the upswing in 2013. (July 22), http://nvca.org/blog/research/corporate-venture-capital-upswing-2013/.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. 8(3):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treisman AM (1969) Strategies and models of selective attention. Psych. Rev. 76(3):282–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psych. 12(1):97–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veghte B (2016) Corporate venture investment to entrepreneurial ecosystem hits fifteen year high in 2015. (January 19), http://nvca.org/pressreleases/corporate-venture-investment-to-entrepreneurial-ecosystem-hits-fifteen-year-high-in-2015/.Google Scholar
• Veugelers R (1997) Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Res. Policy 26(3):303–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1987) Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Res. Policy 16(6):291–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wadhwa A, Kotha S (2006) Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Acad. Management J. 49(4):819–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2003) Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ. Sci. 14(2):149–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2006) Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Acad. Management J. 49(5):960–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Young MN, Peng MW, Ahlstrom D, Bruton GD, Jiang Y (2008) Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. J. Management Stud. 45(1):196–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman MA, Zeitz GJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):414–431.Crossref, Google Scholar