Practice Transfer in Organizations: The Role of Governance Mode for Internal and External Fit

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1135

References

  • Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2010) Comparative and international corporate governance. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):485–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almond P (2011) The sub-national embeddedness of international HRM. Human Relations 64(4):531–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson U, Buckley PJ, Dellestrand H (2015) In the right place at the right time! The influence of knowledge governance tools on knowledge transfer and utilization in MNEs. Global Strategy J. 5(1):27–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari SM, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):67–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari S, Reinecke J, Spaan A (2014) How are practices made to vary? Managing practice adaptation in a multinational corporation. Organ. Stud. 35(9):1313–1341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Fahrenkopf E (2016) Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 136(September):146–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beechler S, Yang JZ (1994) The transfer of Japanese-style management to American subsidiaries: Contingencies, constraints, and competencies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 25(3):467–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brannen MY (2004) When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):593–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewster C, Mayrhofer W, Smale A (2016) Crossing the streams: HRM in multinational enterprises and comparative HRM. Human Resource Management Rev. 26(4):285–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brouthers KD, Hennart J-F (2007) Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. J. Management 33(3):395–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canato A, Ravasi D, Phillips N (2013) Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: Cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of Six Sigma at 3M. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1724–1753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan CM, Makino S (2007) Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(4):621–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corredoira RA, McDermott GA (2014) Adaptation, bridging and firm upgrading: How non-market institutions and MNCs facilitate knowledge recombination in emerging markets. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(6):699–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1325–1350.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF (2016) The Vanishing American Corporation (Berrett-Koehler, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
  • Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16(4):332–343.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorado S (2005) Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organ. Stud. 26(3):385–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards T, Colling T, Ferner A (2007) Conceptual approaches to the transfer of employment practices in multinational companies: An integrated approach. Human Resource Management J. 17(3):201–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case-study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etzion D, Ferraro F (2010) The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1092–1107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferner A, Almond P, Colling T (2005) Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: The case of “workforce diversity” in US multinationals. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 36(3):304–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferner A, Edwards T, Tempel A (2012) Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Human Relations 65(2):163–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC, Kennedy MT, Davis GF (2012) How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1077–1099.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fortwengel J, Jackson G (2016) Legitimizing the apprenticeship practice in a distant environment: Institutional entrepreneurship through inter-organizational networks. J. World Bus. 51(6):895–909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA (1990) The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):603–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbert M, Ruigrok W, Wicki B (2008) What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management J. 29(13):1465–1474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gondo MB, Amis JM (2013) Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):229–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gooderham PN, Nordhaug O, Ringdal K (1999) Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):507–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gospel H, Pendleton A (2003) Finance, corporate governance and the management of labour: A conceptual and comparative analysis. British J. Indust. Relations 41(3):557–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1022–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. 21(3):203–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall PA, Soskice D, eds. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallett T (2010) The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):52–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harzing AW (2001) An analysis of the functions of international transfer of managers in MNCs. Employee Relations 23(6):581–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Wan WP (2005) The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 36(3):322–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt MA, Beamish PW, Jackson SE, Mathieu JE (2007) Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1385–1399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Husted BW (2003) Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalize? Long Range Planning 36(5):481–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson G, Deeg R (2008) Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(4):540–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen RJ, Szulanski G (2004) Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35(6):508–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen RJ, Szulanski G (2007) Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 53(11):1716–1730.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):911–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2009) Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Acad. Management J. 52(5):897–918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 19(3):411–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 24(4):625–645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):308–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T, Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Acad. Management J. 45(1):215–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin MT (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):994–1006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kristensen PH, Zeitlin J (2005) Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence TB, Dover G (2015) Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):371–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (2009) Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B, eds. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee MDP, Lounsbury M (2015) Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organ. Sci. 26(3):847–866.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minbaeva D (2007) Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Management Internat. Rev. 47(4):567–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minbaeva D, Pedersen T, Bjoerkman I, Frey CF, Park HJ (2003) MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(6):586–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore F (2011) Holistic ethnography: Studying the impact of multiple national identities on post-acquisition organizations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(5):654–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan G, Kristensen PH (2006) The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations 59(11):1467–1490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paauwe J, Boselie P (2003) Challenging “strategic HRM” and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management J. 13(3):56–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perez-Aleman P (2011) Collective learning in global diffusion: Spreading quality standards in a developing country cluster. Organ. Sci. 22(1):173–189.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM, Page KL (1998) Network forms of organization. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24(August):57–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 295–336.Google Scholar
  • Powell WW, Colyvas JA (2008) Microfoundations of institutional theory. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 276–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Provan KG, Kenis P (2008) Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 18(2):229–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Management 33(3):479–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragin CC, Amoroso LM (2011) Constructing Social Research (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Rasche A, de Bakker FGA, Moon J (2013) Complete and partial organizing for corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 115(4):651–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regnér P, Edman J (2014) MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(3):275–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth K, Kostova T (2003) The use of the multinational corporation as a research context. J. Management 29(6):883–902.Google Scholar
  • Sanders WG, Tuschke A (2007) The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Acad. Management J. 50(1):33–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Seawright J, Gerring J (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Res. Quart. 61(2):294–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Streeck W (1991) On the institutional conditions of diversified quality production. Matzner E, Streeck W, eds. Beyond Keynesianism: The Socio-Economics of Production and Full Employment (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, UK), 21–61.Google Scholar
  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sydow J, Windeler A (1998) Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 9(3):265–284.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G, Ringov D, Jensen RJ (2016) Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organ. Sci. 27(2):304–322.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thelen KA (2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westney DE (1987) Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westney DE (1993) Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. Ghoshal S, Westney DE, eds. Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (St. Martin’s Press, New York), 53–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitley R (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG, Szulanski G, Ringov D, Jensen RJ (2012) Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organ. Sci. 23(3):672–685.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Yu J, Zaheer S (2010) Building a process model of local adaptation of practices: A study of Six Sigma implementation in Korean and US firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(3):475–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS, Bresser RKF (2000) Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. 21(4):429–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zietsma C, Groenewegen P, Logue D, Hinings CR (2017) Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):391–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.