Make Them Feel: How the Disclosure of Pregnancy to a Supervisor Leads to Changes in Perceived Supervisor Support

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1136

References

  • Alea N, Vick SC (2010) The first sight of love: Relationship-defining memories and marital satisfaction across adulthood. Memory 18(7):730–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altman I, Taylor DA (1973) Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships (Holt, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ambrose ML, Cropanzano R (2003) A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 88(2):266–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacharach SB, Bamberger PA, Vashdi D (2005) Diversity and homophily at work: Supportive relations among white and African-American peers. Acad. Management J. 48(4):619–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldridge DC, Veiga JF (2001) Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: Can requesters’ beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):85–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ballinger GA, Rockmann KW (2010) Chutes versus ladders: Anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):373–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Newman LS (1994) How stories make sense of personal experiences: Motives that shape autobiographical narratives. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(6):676–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bies RJ (2001) Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. Greenberg J, Cropanzano R, eds. Advances in Organizational Justice (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA), 89–118.Google Scholar
  • Bies RJ (2015) Interactional justice: Looking backward, looking forward. Cropanzano R, Ambrose ML, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 89–107.Google Scholar
  • Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Res. Negotiation Organ. 1(1):43–55.Google Scholar
  • Bluck S, Alea N, Habermas T, Rubin D (2005) A tale of three functions: The self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Soc. Cognition 23(1):91–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bono JE, Ilies R (2006) Charisma, positive emotions, and mood contagion. Leadership Quart. 17(4):317–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL (1999) Emotion. Annual Rev. Psych. 50(1):191–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cahill L, Babinsky R, Markowitsch HJ, McGaugh JL (1995) The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature 377(6547):295–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudoir SR, Fisher JD (2010) The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision-making and post-disclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psych. Bull. 136(2):236–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clair JA, Beatty JE, MacLean TL (2005) Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):78–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark MS, Taraban C (1991) Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in communal and exchange relationships. J. Experimental Soc. Psych. 27(4):324–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen G (1998) The effects of aging on autobiographical memory. Thompson CP, Herrmann DJ, Bruce D, Read DJ, Payne DG, Toglia MP, eds. Autobiographical Memory: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ),105–123.Google Scholar
  • Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):386–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):425–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Rodell JB, Long DM, Zapata CP, Conlon DE (2013) Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J. Appl. Psych. 98(2):199–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psych. Rev. 107(2):261–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conway MA, Ross M (1984) Getting what you want by revising what you had. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(4):738–748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker J, Major B, Steele C (1998) Social stigma. Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 504–553.Google Scholar
  • Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Management 31(6):874–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D (1986) Perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3):500–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, Sucharski IL, Rhoades L (2002) Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. J. Appl. Psych. 87(3):565–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans RL (1971) Richard Evans’ Quote Book (Publishers Press, Salt Lake City).Google Scholar
  • Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psych. Bull. 117(1):39–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons FX (1986) Stigma and interpersonal relationships. Ainley SC, Becker G, Coleman LM, eds. The Dilemma of Difference: A Multidisciplinary View of Stigma (Plenum Press, New York), 123–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Wall TD (2009) The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):653–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halpert JA, Burg JH (1997) Mixed messages: Co-worker responses to the pregnant employee. J. Bus. Psych. 12(2):241–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halpert JA, Wilson ML, Hickman JL (1993) Pregnancy as a source of bias in performance appraisals. J. Organ. Behav. 14(7):649–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamann S (2001) Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends Cognitive Sci. 5(9):394–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):104–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V, eds. (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Janoff-Bulman R (1989) Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Soc. Cognition 7(2):113–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones KP (2017) To tell or not to tell? Examining the role of discrimination in the pregnancy disclosure process at work. J. Occupational Health Psych. 22(2):239–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones KP, King EB (2014) Managing concealable stigmas at work: A review and multilevel model. J. Management 40(5):1466–1494.Google Scholar
  • Jourard SM, Lasakow P (1958) Some factors in self-disclosure. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 56(1):91–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ladge J, Clair J, Greenberg D (2012) Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as “professional and mother” during pregnancy. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1449–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lang PJ, Kozak MJ, Miller GA, Levin DN, McLean A (1980) Emotional imagery: Conceptual structure and pattern of somato-visceral response. Psychophysiology 17(2):179–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS (1991) Emotions and Adaptation (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lind EA (2001) Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Greenberg J, Cropanzano R, eds. Advances in Organizational Justice (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 56–88.Google Scholar
  • Lind EA, Kulik CT, Ambrose M, de Vera Park MV (1993) Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):224–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little LM, Major V, Hinojosa A, Nelson DL (2015) Professional image maintenance: How women navigate pregnancy in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 58(1):8–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Model. 9(2):151–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malatesta RM (1995) Understanding the dynamics of organizational and supervisory commitment using a social exchange framework. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit.Google Scholar
  • Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Management J. 43(4):739–748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matthews RA, Wayne JH, Ford MT (2014) A work-family conflict/subjective well-being process model: A test of competing theories of longitudinal effects. J. Appl. Psych. 99(6):1173–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matzzie CG (1993) Substantive equality and antidiscrimination: Accommodating pregnancy under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Georgetown Law J. 82:193–235.Google Scholar
  • McArdle JJ (2001) A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. Cudeck R, du Toit S, Sorbom D, eds. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future (Science, Lincolnwood, IL), 342–380.Google Scholar
  • McArdle JJ (2009) Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Ann. Rev. Psych. 60:577–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McArdle JJ, Nesselroade JR (1994) Structuring data to study development and change. Cohen SH, Reese HW, eds. Life-Span Developmental Psychology: Methodological Innovations (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 223–267.Google Scholar
  • McArdle JJ, Nesselroade JR, eds. (2014) Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Structural Equation Models (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell TR, James LR (2001) Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):530–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan WB, Walker SS, Hebl MR, King EB (2013) A field experiment: Reducing interpersonal discrimination toward pregnant job applicants. J. Appl. Psych. 98(5):799–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newcombe MJ, Ashkanasy NM (2002) The role of affect and affective congruence in perceptions of leaders: An experimental study. Leadership Quart. 13(5):601–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng TWH, Sorensen KL (2008) Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group Organ. Management 33(3):243–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nifadkar S, Tsui AS, Ashforth BE (2012) The way you make me feel and behave: Supervisor-triggered newcomer affect and approach-avoidance behavior. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1146–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pachankis JE (2007) The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psych. Bull. 133(2):328–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Rothbard NP, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):710–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ployhart RE, Vandenberg RJ (2010) Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. J. Management 36(1):94–120.Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR (2008) Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):194–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR, Cornwell JM (2001) Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1244–1261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR, Singh R, Cornwell JM (2007) Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):1103–1118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reis HT, Shaver P (1988) Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Duck SW, ed. Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Interventions (John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK), 367–389.Google Scholar
  • Roberts LM (2005) Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):685–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson MD, Clore GL (2002) Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psych. Bull. 128(6): 934–960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rupp DE, Paddock EL (2010) From justice events to justice climate: A multi-level temporal model of information aggregation and judgment. Mannix EA, Neale MA, Mullen E, eds. Fairness and Groups: Research on Managing Groups and Teams (Emerald Group, Bingley, Whales, Australia), 245–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz FN (1992) Women as a business imperative. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(2):105–113.Google Scholar
  • Selig JP, Preacher KJ (2009) Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Res. Human Development 6(2–3):144–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro DL, Buttner EH, Barry B (1994) Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 58(3):346–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver P, Schwartz J, Kirson D, O’connor C (1987) Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(6):1061–1086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer JA, Blagov P (2002) Classification System and Scoring Manual for Self-Defining Memories (Connecticut College, New London).Google Scholar
  • Singer JA, Salovey P (1993) The Remembered Self: Emotion and Memory in Personality ( Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ. Res. Methods 9(2):221–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C (2003) Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. J. Organ. Behav. 24(3):251–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 3(1):4–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA (2009) How emotions regulate social life. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(3):184–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Cheshin A (2012) Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organ. Psych. Rev. 2(4):311–339.Google Scholar
  • Van Kleef GA, van den Berg H, Heerdink MW (2014) The persuasive power of emotions: Effects of emotional expressions on attitude formation and change. J. Appl. Psych. 100(4):1124–1142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vitali A (2016) Trump in 2004: Pregnancy is an “inconvenience” to employers. NBC News (May 26), http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-2004-pregnancy-inconvenience-employers-n580366.Google Scholar
  • Walker HJ, Bauer TN, Cole MS, Bernerth JB, Feild HS, Short JC (2013) Is this how I will be treated? Reducing uncertainty through recruitment interactions. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1325–1347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss HM, Cropanzano R (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 18(January):1–74.Google Scholar
  • Weiss HM, Suckow K, Cropanzano R (1999) Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. J. Appl. Psych. 84(5):786–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood WJ, Conway M (2006) Subjective impact, meaning making, and current and recalled emotions for self-defining memories. J. Personality 74(3):811–846.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • World Bank (2014) Gender at work: A companion to World Development Report on Jobs. Accessed August 12, 2016, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17121.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.