Drawing Snow White and Animating Buzz Lightyear: Technological Toolkit Characteristics and Creativity in Cross-Disciplinary Teams

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3):321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow H, McGrath JE, Berdahl JL (2000) Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ashworth M, Mukhopadhyay T, Argote L (2004) Information technology and organizational learning: An empirical analysis. Proc. 25th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform Systems (ICIS), Washington, DC, 11–21.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Oldham GR (2006) The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):963–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakeman R, Gottman JM (1997) Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on the production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendazzi G (2016) Animation: A World History (CRC Press, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Tenkasi RV, Te’eni D (1994) Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. 5(3):456–475.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Guinan EC, Lakhani KR, Riedl C (2012) Paradox of novelty and bias for normal science. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Cacciatori E (2008) Memory objects in project environments: Storing retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Res. Policy 37(9):1591–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Lakhani KR (2012) Innovation and the challenge of novelty: The novelty-confirmation transformation cycle in software and science. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Catmull E (2008) How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(9):64–72.Google Scholar
• Catmull E, Wallace A (2014) Creativity Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces that Stand in the Way of True Inspiration (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievement in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement 20(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihályi M (1988) Society culture and person: A systems view of creativity. Sternberg RJ, ed. The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, New York), 325–339.Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihályi M (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. Sternberg RJ, ed. Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, New York), 313–335.Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Baas M, Nijstad BA (2008) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(5):739–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Montanari F, Usai A (2005) Reputation and strength of ties in predicting commercial success and artistic merit of independents in the Italian feature film industry. J. Management Stud. 42(5):975–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.Link, Google Scholar
• DiBenigno J, Kellogg KC (2014) Beyond occupational differences the importance of cross-cutting demographics and dyadic toolkits for collaboration in a US hospital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):375–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 31(2):79–202.Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujimura J (1992) Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects and translation. Pickering A, ed. Science as Practice and Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 168–211.Google Scholar
• George J M (2008) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigone D, Hastie R (1993) The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(5):959–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Argote L, Miron-Spektor E, Todorova G (2010) First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):102–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman W (1983) Adventures in the Screen Trade (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2011) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, New York).Google Scholar
• Haans RF, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Ham W (2015) Microfoundations of knowledge recombination: Peripheral knowledge and breakthrough innovation in teams. Gavetti G, Ocasio W, eds. Cognition and Strategy. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 32 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 47–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Lorsch JL, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hanneman RA, Riddle M (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods (University of California, Riverside).Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2014) Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1256–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2013) A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. J. Experiment. Social Psych. 49(5):822–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ (1999) The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. 5(2):205–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamoche K, Cunha MP (2001) Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organ. Stud. 22(5):733–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kannan S, Harvey S, Peterson RS (2016) Coordination failure: A temporal perspective on group diversity. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):453–493.Google Scholar
• Kaplan A (1964) The Logic of Inquiry (Chronicle, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2011) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22(2):482–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Kvalseth TO (1989) Note on Cohen’s kappa. Psych. Rep. 65(1):223–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampel J, Lant T, Shamsie J (2000) Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organ. Sci. 11(3):263–269.Link, Google Scholar
• Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Laudel G (2006) Conclave in the Tower of Babel: How peers review interdisciplinary research proposals. Res. Evaluation 15(1):57–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laybourne K (1998) The Animation Book (Three Rivers Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N, Greenberg E, Chen Z (2011) Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):730–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Argote L (2001) Group processes in organizational contexts. Hogg MA, Tindale RS, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 603–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neale B (2014) Award-winning animation is a mixed media masterpiece. Accessed February 19, 2017, http://www.creativebloq.com/3d/award-winning-animation-mixed-media-masterpiece-51411778#null.Google Scholar
• Nicolini D, Mengis J, Swan, J (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organ. Sci. 23(3):612–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Ohly S, Fritz C (2010) Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. J. Organ. Behav. 31(4):543–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. 39(3):607–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Peplowski K (1998) The process of improvisation. Organ. Sci. 9(5):560–561.Link, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2007) Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):563–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2014) A social composition view of team creativity: The role of member nationality-heterogeneous ties outside of the team. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1434–1452.Link, Google Scholar
• Pickering A (1993) The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(3):559–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirola-Merlo A, Mann L (2004) The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. J. Organ. Behav. 25(2):235–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer JT, Milton LP, Swarm WB (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin Sci. Quart. 47(2):296–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price DA (2009) The Pixar Touch: The Making of a Company (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodowick DN (2008) The Virtual Life of Film (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rottenberg J (2014) James Cameron on his deep sea doc and managing a fathomless project. Accessed February 19, 2017, http://www.fastcocreate.com/3033243/creative-conversations/james-cameron-on-his-deep-sea-doc-and-managing-a-fathomless-project.Google Scholar
• Schlender B, Tkaczyk T (2006) Pixar’s magic man. Fortune Internat. (Europe) 153(9):66.Google Scholar
• Seidel V, O’Mahony S (2014) Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes and concept coherence in product innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(3):691–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2007) Interpreting empirical results in strategy and management research. Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 4 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 273–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2003) Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product person, process perspectives. Psych. Bull. 129(4):475–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2004) Film awards as indicators of cinematic creativity and achievement: A quantitative comparisons of the Oscars and six alternatives. Creativity Res. J. 16(2–3):163–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen O, Waguespack DM (2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):560–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Huhns M, Gasser L, eds. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA), 37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Vaughan SI, Stewart DD (2000) Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):102–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggar S (2002) Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Acad. Management J. 45(2):315–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Greve HR (2006) Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor R (1999) The Encyclopedia of Animation Techniques (Focal Press, Waltham, MA).Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Ogden TY, Neale MA (2003) Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. 49(4):464–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vera D, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ. Sci. 16(3):203–224.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Katz R (2002) Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Sci. 48(7):821–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior, Vol. 9 (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1996) Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):301–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar