How Coordination Trajectories Influence the Performance of Interorganizational Project Networks

References

• Atkinson R (1999) Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Internat. J. Project Management 17(6):337–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S (2006) Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Internat. J. Project Management 24(8):687–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker RM (2010) Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. Internat. J. Project Management Rev. 12(4):466–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker RM, Knoben J (2015) Built to last or meant to end: Intertemporal choice in strategic alliance portfolios. Organ. Sci. 26(1):256–276.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Ballard DI, Seibold DS (2003) Communicating and organizing in time. Management Comm. Quart. 16(3):380–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Graffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Berthod O, Grothe-Hammer M, Sydow J (2016) Network ethnography. Organ. Res. Methods 20(2):299–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Everett M, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing Social Networks (Sage Publication Limited, London).Google Scholar
• Brass D, Galaskiewicz J, Greve H, Tsai W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organisations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6):795–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryman A, Brensen M, Beardsworth AD, Ford J, Keil ET (1987) The concept of the temporary system: The case of the construction project. Di Tomaso N, Bacharach SB, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 5 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 253–283.Google Scholar
• Burke CM, Morley MJ (2016) On temporary organizations: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Human Relations 69(6):1235–1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Lumineau F (2015) Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. J. Oper. Management 33/34(January):15–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K, Palmquist M (1992) Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Soc. Forces 70(3):601–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Frederiksen L, Täube F (2011) Project-based organizing and strategic management: A long-term research agenda on temporary organizational forms. Cattani G, Ferriani S, Frederiksen L, Täube F, eds. Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 28 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), xv–xxxix.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1986) Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. Amer. J. Soc. 91(6):1309–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies A, Hobday M (2005) The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFillippi R, Sydow J (2016) Project networks: Choice of governance and paradoxical tensions. Project Management J. 47(5):6–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan WR (1996) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Project Management Institute, Upper Darby, PA).Google Scholar
• Ebers M, Maurer I (2016) To continue or not to continue? Drivers of recurrent partnering in temporary organizations. Organ. Stud. 37(12):1861–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebers M, Oerlemans L (2016) The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy. J. Management 42(6):1491–1529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles R (1981) The quasifirm in the construction industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):335–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Graebner L (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engwall M (2003) No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Res. Policy 32(5):789–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2014) Megaproject Planning and Management: Essential Readings (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Ford C, Sullivan DM (2004) A time for everything: How the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 25(2):279–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gann D, Salter A, Dodgson M, Phillips N (2012) Inside the world of the project Baron. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 53(3):63–71.Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32(2):274–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden B (1992) The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. 35(4):848–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K, Locke K (2007) Composing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandori A (1997) Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. J. Management Governance 1(1):29–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Soc. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012a) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F, Zhelyazkov P (2012b) The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):531–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD (1988) Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. J. Law Econom. Organ. 4(1):119–139.Google Scholar
• Hassard J (1991) Aspects of time in organization. Human Relations 44(2):105–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Staudenmayer N (2000) Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Staw BM, Sutton RI, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herazo B, Lizarralde G (2015) The influence of green building certifications in collaboration and innovation processes. Construction Management Econom. 33(4):279–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernes T, Simpson B, Söderlund J (2013) Managing and temporality. Scandinavian J. Management 29(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobday M (2000) The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Res. Policy 29(7):871–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgson DE (2004) Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization 11(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey S, Moon H, Conlon D, Hofmann D (2004) Decision-making and behavior fluidity: How focus on completion and emphasis on safety changes over the course of projects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 93(1):14–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janowicz-Panjaitan M, Bakker RM, Kenis P (2009) Research on temporary organizations: The state of the art and distinct approaches toward temporariness. Kenis P, Janowicz-Panjaitan M, Cambré B, eds. Temporary Organizations: Prevalence, Logic and Effectiveness (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, MA), 56–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick T (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Lichtenstein B (2008) Temporary inter-organizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainity. Cropper S, Huxham C, Ebers M, Ring PS, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 231–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Hesterly W, Borgatti S (1997) A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):911–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenis P, Knoke D (2002) How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):275–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1994) Graph theoretic dimensions of informal organizations. Carley KM, Prietula MJ, eds. Computational Organizational Theory (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ), 89–111.Google Scholar
• Laumann E, Marsden P, Prensky D (1989) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Freeman L, White D, Romney A, eds. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, Applied Network Analysis, Vol. 61 (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 18–34.Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3):248–266.Link, Google Scholar
• Levering R, Oerlemans L, Noorderhaven N, Ligthart R (2016) Collaboration in project networks: The case of the Dutch shipbuilding industry. Sydow J, Schüssler J, Müller-Seitz G, eds. Managing Inter-Organizational Relations (Macmillan Publishers Limited, London), 287–295.Google Scholar
• Ligthart R, Oerlemans L, Noorderhaven N (2016) In the shadows of time: A case study of flexibility behaviors in an interorganizational project. Organ. Stud. 37(12):1721–1743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindkvist L, Soderlund J, Tell F (1998) Managing product development projects: On the significance of fountains and deadlines. Organ. Stud. 19(6):931–951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipparini A, Lorenzoni G, Ferriani S (2014) From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate shaping of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks. Strategic Management J. 35(4):578–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F (2017) How contracts influence trust and distrust. J. Management 43(5):1553–1577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Henderson J (2012) The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes. J. Oper. Management 30(5):382–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Malhotra D (2011) Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes inter-firm dispute resolution. Strategic Management J. 32(5):532–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Quelin BV (2012) An empirical investigation of interorganizational opportunism and contracting mechanisms. Strategic Organ. 10(1):55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macaulay S (1963) Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Soc. Rev. 28(1):55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Lumineau F (2011) Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: The effects of contract structure. Acad. Management J. 54(5):981–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandell M (1984) Application of network analysis to the implementation of a complex project. Human Relations 37(8):659–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning S, Sydow J (2011) Projects, paths, and practices: Sustaining and leveraging project-based relationships. Indust. Corporate Change 20(5):1369–1402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maoret M, Massa F, Jones C (2011) Toward a projects as events perspective, project-based organizing and strategic management. Cattani G, Ferriani S, Frederiksen L, Täube F, eds. Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 28 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 427–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten SE, Meehan JW, Snyder EA (1991) The costs of organization. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(1):1–25.Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Brass DJ, Borgatti S, Labianca G (2013) A network perspective on megaengineering projects. Brunn S, ed. Engineering Earth: The Impacts of Megaengineering Projects (Springer, New York), 769–782.Google Scholar
• Meng X (2012) The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. Internat. J. Project Management 30(2):188–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. Kramer R, Tyler T, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 166–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB (1964) On temporary systems. Miles MB, ed. Innovation in Education (Teachers College Press, New York), 437–490.Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman A (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Morris P (1988) Managing project interfaces: Key points for project success. Cleland D, King W, eds. Project Management Handbook (Van Nostrand, New York), 16–55.Google Scholar
• Morris P (1994) The Management of Projects (Thomas Telford, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ness H (2009) Governance, negotiations, and alliance dynamics: Explaining the evolution of relational practice. J. Management Stud. 46(3):451–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2012) Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1571–1592.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G, Bechky B (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson EM, Walker OC, Ruekert RW (2001) Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. J. Marketing 59(1):48–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Amer. J. Soc. 98(6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pich MT, Loch CH, De Meyer A (2002) On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Sci. 48(8):1008–1023.Link, Google Scholar
• Pinto JK (2004) The elements of project success. Cleland DI, ed. Field Guide to Project Management, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 14–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto JK, Prescott JE (1988) Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J. Management 14(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI) (2014) PMI’s Pulse of the Profession: The High Cost of Low Performance 2014 (PMI, Newtown Square, PA).Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Milward HB (1995) A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Management 33(3):479–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pryke SD (2004) Analysing construction project coalitions: Exploring the application of social network analysis. Construction Management Econom. 22(8):787–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Ariño A (2007) Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management J. 28(3):313–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reve T, Levitt RE (1984) Organization and governance in construction. Internat. J. Project Management 2(1):17–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2000) The structuration and destructuration of organizations and organizational fields. Baum J, Dobbin F, eds. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 17 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 181–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D, Levy O, Maltz AC (2001) Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning 34(6):699–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon F, Tellier F (2016) Balancing contradictory temporality during the unfold of innovation streams. Internat. J. Project Management 34(6):983–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smyth H, Pryke S (2008) Collaborative Relationship in Construction: Developing Frameworks and Networks (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Usai A, Zaheer A (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6):893–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1959) Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: A comparative study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 4(2):168–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stjerne I, Svejenova S (2016) Connecting temporary and permanent organizing: Tensions and boundary work in sequential film projects. Organ. Stud. 37(12):1771–1792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A (1993) Continual Permutations of Action (Aldine De Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research—Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Styhre A (2006) The bureaucratization of the project manager function: The case of the construction industry. Internat. J. Project Management 24(3):271–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schüssler E, Müller-Seitz G (2016) Managing Inter-Organizational Relations: Debates and Cases (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Sciences Bases of Administration (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. 26(11):1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):36–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson A (2015) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Gordon W (1984) The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):598–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Poole M (2005) Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organ. Stud. 26(9):1377–1404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Delbecq AL, Koenig R Jr (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Ende L, Van Marrewijk A (2014) The ritualization of transitions in the project life cycle: A study of transition rituals in construction projects. Internat. J. Project Management 32(7):1134–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb E, Weick K (1979) Unobtrusive measures in organizational theory: A reminder. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):650–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winch GM (2001) Governing the project process: A conceptual framework. Construction Management Econom. 19(8):799–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winch GM (2014) Three domains of project organising. Internat. J. Project Management 32(5):721–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windeler A, Sydow J (2001) Project networks and changing industry practices collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organ. Stud. 22(6):1035–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolthuis R, Nooteboom B, de Jong G, Faems D (2013) The role of third-parties in strategic alliance governance. Das TK, ed. Interpartner Dynamics in Strategic Alliances (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC), 55–72.Google Scholar
• Yin R (1994) Case Study Research—Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Zaghloul R, Hartman F (2003) Construction contracts: The cost of mistrust. Internat. J. Project Management 21(6):419–424.Crossref, Google Scholar