Smart or Diverse Start-up Teams? Evidence from a Field Experiment

References

• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amason A, Shrader R, Tompson G (2006) Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 21(1):125–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S (2003) A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J. Bus. Venturing 18(1):105–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D (2007) The Entrepreneurial Society (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RA (2006) Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(1):104–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RA (2007) Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):167–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RA, Ensley MD (2006) Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Sci. 52(9):1331–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C, Burton M, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell S (2007) Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):595–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellé N (2014) Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 24(1):109–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhidé A (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1987) Strategic origins: Entrepreneurial and environmental imprinting at founding. Acad. Management Perspect. 8(1):150–154.Google Scholar
• Bors D, Stokes T (1998) Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational Psych. Measurement 58(3):382–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boss R (1978) Trust and managerial problem solving revisited. Group Organ. Stud. 3(3):331–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowers C, Pharmer J, Salas E (2000) When member homogeneity is needed to work in teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 31(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bygrave W, Zacharakis A (2007) Entrepreneurship (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Carpenter M, Geletkanycz M, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter P, Just M, Shell P (1990) What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test. Psych. Rev. 97(3):404–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi YR, Shepherd DA (2004) Entrepreneurs’ decisions to exploit opportunities. J. Management 30(3):377–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwolka A, Raith MG (2012) The value of business planning before start-up? A decision-theoretical perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 27(3):385–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shopfloor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Saral K (2013) Entrepreneurship and team participation: An experimental study. Eur. Econom. Rev. 59(April):126–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson C, De Meza D, Henley A, Arabsheibani G (2015) The power of (non) positive thinking: Self-employed pessimists earn more than optimists. Discussion Paper 9242, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devine DJ (1999) Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Res. 30(5):608–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devine DJ, Philips JL (2001) Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Res. 32(5):507–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2010) Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1238–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dvir T, Eden D, Avolio BJ, Shamir B (2002) Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Acad. Management J. 45(4):735–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):269–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Hsu D, Roberts E (2014) The contingent effect of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1798–1817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis S, Aharonson B, Drori I, Shapira Z (2017) Imprinting through inheritance: A multi-genealogical study of entrepreneurial proclivity. Acad. Management J. 60(2):500–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira D, Kirchmaier T (2013) Corporate boards in Europe: Size, independence and gender diversity. Belcredi M, Ferrarini G, eds. Boards and Shareholders in European Listed Companies: Facts, Context and Post-Crisis Reforms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 191–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franck E, Nuesch S (2010) The effect of talent disparity on team productivity in soccer. J. Econom. Psych. 31(2):218–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geary DC, Brown SC, Samaranayake VA (1991) Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psych. 27(5):787–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg L (1990) An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(6):1216–1229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grégoire DA, Barr PS, Shepherd DA (2010) Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organ. Sci. 21(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Gruber M (2007) Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 22(6):782–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel R, Schmittmann V (2006) The 20-minute version as a predictor of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices test. Educational Psych. Measurement 66(6):1039–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen Z, Owan H, Pan J (2015) The impact of group diversity on class performance: Evidence from college classrooms. Ed. Econom. 23(2):238–258.Google Scholar
• Hansen Z, Owan H, Pan J, Sugawara S (2014) The impact of group contract and governance structure on performance: Evidence from college classrooms. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 30(3):463–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartog J, Van Praag M, Van Der Sluis J (2010) If you are so smart, why aren’t you an entrepreneur? Returns to cognitive and social ability: Entrepreneurs versus employees. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(4):947–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (2006) Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312(5782):1900–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Stixrud J, Urzua S (2006) The effects of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. J. Labor Econom. 24(3):411–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holm H, Opper S, Nee V (2013) Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: An economic experiment in China. Management Sci. 59(7):1671–1687.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Page S (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(46):16385–16389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn SM, Oosterbeek H, Van Praag CM (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59(7):1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Horwitz S, Horwitz I (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Management 33(6):987–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2007) Opportunity discovery, problem solving and a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. J. Management Stud. 44(7):1255–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson V (2007) What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):97–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung H, Vissa B, Pich M (2017) How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Acad. Management J. 60(1):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Aldrich HE (2005) Social capital and entrepreneurship. Foundations Trends Entrepreneurship 1(2):55–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirzner IM (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. J. Econom. Literature 35(1):60–85.Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1357.Link, Google Scholar
• Kopelman R (1986) Managing Productivity in Organizations (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Koudstaal M, Sloof R, Van Praag M (2016) Risk, uncertainty and entrepreneurship: Evidence from a large lab-in-the-field experiment. Management Sci. 62(10):2897–2915.Link, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S, Bell B (2013) Work group and teams in organizations: Review update. Schmitt N, Highhouse S, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Volume 12, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 412–469.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2005) Entrepreneurship. J. Labor Econom. 23(4):649–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine J, Van Dyne L (2001) Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psych. 86(2):326–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGreggor K, Kunda M, Goel AK (2011) Fractal analogies: Preliminary results from the Raven’s test of intelligence. Proc. Second Internat. Conf. Comput. Creativity, Mexico City, 69–71.Google Scholar
• Mills C, Ablard K, Brody L (1993) The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Its usefulness for identifying gifted/talented students. Roeper Rev. 15(3):183–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr JJ, Spekman RE (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management J. 15(2):135–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuman GA, Wright J (1999) Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psych. 84(3):376–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien GE, Owens A (1969) Effects of organizational structure upon correlations between member abilities and group productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 53(6):525–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek H, Van Praag M, Ijsselstein A (2010) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 54(3):442–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papps K, Bryson A, Gomez R (2011) Heterogeneous worker ability and team-based production: Evidence from Major League Baseball, 1920–2009. Labour Econom. 18(3):310–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prat A (2002) Should a team be homogeneous? Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(7):1187–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raven J, Raven J, Court J (1993) General overview. Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales (Psychologists Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Raven J, Raven J, Court J (1998) Advanced progressive matrices. Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales (Psychologists Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Reagans R (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4):835–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhode T, Thompson L (2007) Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence 35(1):83–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich H, Carter N (2003) The structure of organizational founding teams: Homophily, strong ties and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scarborough N, Cornwall J (2014) Entrepreneurship and Effective Small Business Management, 11th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Schmidt F, Hunter J, Outerbridge A (1986) Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance and supervisory ratings of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3):432–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Smith DB, Sipe WP (2000) Personnel selection psychology: Multilevel considerations. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 91–120.Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC (2000) Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Acad. Management J. 43(2):215–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):217–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steffens P, Terjesen S, Davidsson P (2012) Birds of a feather get lost together: New venture team composition and performance. Small Bus. Econom. 39(3):727–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steiner ID (1972) Group Process and Productivity (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
• Stewart G (2006) A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. J. Management 32(1):29–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A (1965) Social structure and organizations. Baum J, Dobbin F, eds. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 17 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 229–259.Google Scholar
• Urban KK (2004) Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP) the concept, application, evaluation, and international studies. Psych. Sci. 46(3):387–397.Google Scholar
• U.S. Small Business Administration (USSBA) (2009) Effective federal income tax rates faced by small businesses in the United States. Technical report, Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, Schippers M (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(January):515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, Van Knippen C, Homan A (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Praag M, Cramer J (2001) The roots of entrepreneurship and labor demand: Individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica 68(269):45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams K, O’Reilly C (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20(20):77–140.Google Scholar
• Zand DE (1972) Trust and managerial problem solving. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(2):229–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Seibert S (2006) The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):259–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman MA, Zeitz GJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):414–431.Crossref, Google Scholar