Achieving Time-Sensitive Organizational Performance Through Mindful Use of Technologies and Routines

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1159

References

  • Aanestad M, Jensen TB (2016) Collective mindfulness in post-implementation IS adaptation processes. Inform. Organ. 26(1–2): 13–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Gao G, DesRoches C, Jha AK (2010) Research commentary: The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):769–809.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahire SL, Devaraj S (2001) An empirical comparison of statistical construct validation approaches. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 48(3):319–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahire SL, Golhar DY, Waller MA (1996) Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sci. 27(1):23–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand G, Gray J, Siemsen E (2012) Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1700–1716.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang S, Cummings LL (1997) Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organ. Sci. 8(3):235–256.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angst CM, Devaraj S, Queenan CC, Greenwood B (2011) Performance effects related to the sequence of integration of healthcare technologies. Production Oper. Management 20(3):319–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ash JS, Sittig DF, Poon EG, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra RH (2007) The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 14(4):415–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):421–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benson PG, Saraph JV, Schroeder RG (1991) The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 37(9):1107–1124.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer KK (1999) Evolutionary patterns of flexible automation and performance: A longitudinal study. Management Sci. 45(6): 824–842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer KK, Gardner JW, Schweikhart S (2012) Process quality improvement: An examination of general vs. outcome-specific climate and practices in hospitals. J. Oper. Management 30(4):325–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D (2011) The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs 30(3):464–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler BS, Gray PH (2006) Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quart. 30(2):211–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cambell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland R (2007) Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. New England J. Medicine 357(2): 181–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell EM, Sitting DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH (2006) Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 13(5):547–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, Shoultz DA, Levy D, French WJ, Gore JMet al. (2000) Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 283(22):2941–2947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran A, Senot C, Boyer KK (2012) Process management impact on clinical and experiential quality: Managing tensions between safe and patient-centered healthcare. Manuf. Service Oper. Management. 14(4):548–566.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wi S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG (2006) Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency and costs of medical care. Ann. Internal Medicine 144(7):742–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Classen DC, Evans RS, Prestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP (1992) The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. New England J. Medicine 326(5):281–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Colbert A, Yee N, George G (2016) The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Acad. Management J. 59(3):731–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crosby PB (1989) Let’s Talk Quality (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5): 554–571.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Danner-Schröder A, Geiger D (2016) Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organ. Sci. 27(3): 633–658.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dean JW Jr, Bowen DE (1994) Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 19(3):392–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3): 273–289.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman DA (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (J. Wiley & Sons Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  • Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Louiseaveling E, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ (2011) Explaining Michigan: Developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Quart. 89(20):167–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doty DH, Glick WH (1998) Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results. Organ. Res. Methods 1(4): 374–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drach-Zahavy A, Goldblatt H, Maizel A (2015) Between standardisation and resilience: Nurses’ emergent risk management strategies during handovers. J. Clinical Nursing 24(3–4):592–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdei C, McAvoy LL, Gupta M, Pereira S, McGowan EC (2015) Is zero central line–associated bloodstream infection rate sustainable? A 5-year perspective. Pediatrics 135(6):e1485–e1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):505–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Flynn EJ (1999) World class manufacturing: An investigation of Hayes and Wheelwright’s foundation. J. Oper. Management 17(3):249–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(February):39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gardner JW, Boyer KK, Gray JV (2015) Operational and strategic information processing: Complementing healthcare IT infrastructure. J. Oper. Management 33(January):123–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gärtner C, Huber C (2017) Pick up your tools: Integrating tools into a sociomaterial model of mindful organizing. J. Management Inquiry, ePub ahead of print April 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492617703199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Georgiou A, Westbrook J (2009) Clinician reports of the impact of electronic ordering on an emergency department. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 150:678–682.Google Scholar
  • Gilson LL, Mathiu JE, Shalley CE, Ruddy TM (2005) Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Acad. Management J. 48(3):521–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH (2001) Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure performance: A reassessment of postbureaucracy theory. Organ. Sci. 12(4):468–483.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein SM, Iossifova AR (2012) Ten years after: Interference of hospital slack in process performance benefits of quality practices. J. Oper. Management 30(1–2):44–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG (2009) Costs and benefits of health information technology: New trends from the literature. Health Affairs 28(2):w282–w293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham JW (2009) Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Rev. Psych. 60(January):549–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hales DN, Chakravorty SS (2016) Creating high reliability organizations using mindfulness. J. Bus. Res. 69(8):2873–2881.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tathum R, Black W (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hayes R, Pisano G, Upton D, Wheelwright S (2005) Operations, Strategy, and Technology: Pursuing the Competitive Edge (J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Heinze KL, Weber K (2016) Toward organizational pluralism: Institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organ. Sci. 27(1):157–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hilligoss B, Vogus TJ (2015) Navigating care transitions: A process model of how doctors overcome organizational barriers and create awareness. Medical Care Res. Rev. 72(1):25–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jahansefat L, Vardanjani MM, Bigdelian H, Massoumi G, Khalili A, Mardani D (2016) Exploration of knowledge of, adherence to, attitude and barriers toward evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in healthcare workers of pediatric cardiac intensive care units (PCICUs): A Quali-Quantitative survey. Internat. J. Medical Res. Health Sciences 5(9):67–73.Google Scholar
  • Kazley AS, Ozcan YA (2007) Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital EMR adoption: A national study. J. Medical Systems 31(5):375–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ketokivi MA, Schroeder RG (2004) Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction. J. Oper. Management 22(3):247–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. (2000) To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Lacalio AR, Kimmel SE, Strom BL (2005) Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 293(10):1197–1203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kremser W, Schreyögg G (2016) The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organ. Sci. 27(3):698–721.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Langer EJ (1989) Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness. Leonard Berkowitz, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22 (Academy Press, New York), 137–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LaPorte TR, Consolini PM (1991) Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of “high reliability organizations.” J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 1(1):19–48.Google Scholar
  • Laureiro-Martinez D (2014) Cognitive control capabilities, routinization propensity, and decision-making performance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1111–1133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lei Z, Naveh E, Novikov Z (2016) Errors in organizations: An integrative review via level of analysis, temporal dynamism, and priority lenses. J. Management 42(5):1315–1343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L, Benton WC (2006) Hospital technology and nurse staffing management decisions. J. Oper. Management 24(5):676–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macrae C, Draycott T (2016) Delivering high reliability in maternity care: In situ simulation as a source of organisational resilience. Safety Sci., ePub ahead of print November 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.019.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazdeh MM, Hesamamiri R (2014) Knowledge management reliability and its impact on organizational performance: An empirical study. Program 48(2):102–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menor LJ, Roth AV (2007) New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation. J. Oper. Management 25(4):825–846.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer C (1993) Fast Cycle Time: How to Align Purpose, Strategy, and Structure for Speed (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (1980) Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Sci. 26(3):322–341.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mu E, Kirsch LJ, Butler BS (2015) The assimilation of enterprise information system: An interpretation systems perspective. Inform. Management 52(3):359–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadzam DM, Macklis RM (2001) Promoting patient safety: Is technology the solution? Joint Commission J. Quality Improvement 27(8):430–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nembhard IM, Tucker AL (2010) Deliberate learning to improve performance in dynamic service settings: Evidence from hospital intensive care units. Organ. Sci. 22(4):907–922.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Norman D (2013) The Design of Everyday Things: Revised And Expanded Edition (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Patriotta G, Gruber DA (2015) Newsmaking and sensemaking: Navigating temporal transitions between planned and unexpected events. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1574–1592.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peng DX, Schroeder RG, Shah R (2008) Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. J. Oper. Management 26(6): 730–748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C (1984) Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pirnejad H, Niazkhani Z, van der Sijs H, Berg M, Bal R (2008) Impact of a computerized physician order entry system on nurse—Physician collaboration in the medication process. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 77(11):735–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Queenan CC, Angst CM, Devaraj S (2011) Doctors’ orders—If they’re electronic, do they improve patient satisfaction? A complements/substitutes perspective. J. Oper. Management 29(7–8):639–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):50–69.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts KH (1990a) Managing high reliability organizations. California Management Rev. 32(4):101–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts KH (1990b) Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organ. Sci. 1(2):160–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosness R, Evjemo TE, Haavik T, Wærø, I (2016) Prospective sensemaking in the operating theatre. Cognition, Tech. Work. 18(1):53–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin DB (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys (J. Wiley & Sons Inc., New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rungtusanatham M, Forza C, Koka BR, Salvador F, Nie W (2005) TQM across multiple countries: Convergence hypothesis versus national specificity arguments. J. Oper. Management 23(1):43–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samson D, Terziovski M (1999) The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. J. Oper. Management 17(4):393–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psych. Methods 7(2):147–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schafer JL, Olsen MK (1998) Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Res. 33(4):545–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah R, Goldstein SM (2006) Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. J. Oper. Management 24(2):148–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah R, Ward PT (2003) Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Management 21(2):129–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonenshein S (2016) Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organ. Sci. 27(3):739–758.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spear S, Bowen HK (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(September):96–106.Google Scholar
  • Spear SJ, Schmidhofer M (2005) Ambiguity and workarounds as contributors to medical error. Ann. Internal Medicine 142(8):627–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spee P, Jarzabkowski P, Smets M (2016) The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organ. Sci. 27(3):759–781.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ (2000) Images of mindfulness. J. Soc. Issues 56(1):11–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB, Ramiller NC (2004) Innovating mindfully with information technology. MIS Quart. 28(4):553–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song M, Swink M (2009) Marketing—Manufacturing integration across stages of new product development: Effects on the success of high- and low-innovativeness products. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 56(1):31–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutcliffe KM, Vogus TJ, Dane E (2016) Mindfulness in organizations: A cross-level review. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(March):55–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor FW (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Van Gelder T, Berg M, Vulto A (2008) Turning off frequently overridden drug alerts: Limited opportunities for doing it safely. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 15(4):439–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogus TJ, Iacobucci D (2016) Creating highly reliable health care: How reliability-enhancing work practices affect patient safety in hospitals. ILR Rev. 69(4):911–938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogus TJ, Sutcliffe KM (2007) The safety organizing scale: Development and validation of a behavioral measure of safety culture in hospital nursing units. Medical Care 45(10):46–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogus TJ, Sutcliffe KM, Weick KE (2010) Doing no harm: Enabling, enacting, and elaborating a culture of safety in health care. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(4):60–77.Google Scholar
  • Voss ZG, Cable DM, Voss GB (2006) Organizational identity and firm performance: What happens when leaders disagree about “who we are?” Organ. Sci. 17(6):741–755.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2001) Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (J. Wiley & Sons Inc., San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability. Res. Organ. Behav. 1(21):81–94.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2000) High reliability: The power of mindfulness. Leader Leader 17(7):1–56.Google Scholar
  • White SM, Griffiths R, Moppett IK (2016) Standardising anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Anaesthesia 71(12):1391–1395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi S, Knudson T, Becker MC (2016) Inertia in routines: A hidden source of organizational variation. Organ. Sci. 27(3):782–800.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.