Cultural Brokerage and Creative Performance in Multicultural Teams

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1162

References

  • Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity (Westview, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Benet-Martinez V, Lee F, Leu J (2006) Biculturalism and cognitive complexity expertise in cultural representations. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 37(4):386–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benet-Martinez V, Leu J, Lee F, Morris MW (2002) Negotiating biculturalism cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 33(5):492–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Brannen MY, Thomas DC (2010) Bicultural individuals in organizations implications and opportunity. Internat. J. Cross Cultural Management 10(1):5–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brannen MY, Garcia D, Thomas DC (2009) Biculturals as natural bridges for intercultural communication and collaboration. Proc. 2009 Internat. Workshop Intercultural Collaboration, February 20–21, Palo Alto, CA (ACM, New York), 207–210.Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carton AM, Cummings JN (2012) A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):441–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):749–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng CY, Sanchez-Burks J, Lee F (2008) Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psych. Sci. 19(11):1178–1184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua RY (2013) The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1545–1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua RYJ, Morris MW, Mor S (2012) Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):116–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psych. Assessment 6(4):284–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton CD, Hinds PJ (2005) Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, Vol. 26 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 231–263.Google Scholar
  • Di Marco MK, Taylor JE, Alin P (2010) Emergence and role of cultural boundary spanners in global engineering project networks. J. Management Engrg. 26(3):123–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Earley PC, Gibson CB (2002) Multinational Work Teams (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Earley PC, Mosakowski E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Management J. 43(1):26–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely RJ (1995) The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Acad. Management J. 38(3):589–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez RM, Gould RV (1994) A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1455–1491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French JR, Raven B (1959) The bases of social power. Cartwright D, ed. Studies in Social Power (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 311–320.Google Scholar
  • Friedman RA, Podolny J (1992) Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implication and role conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):28–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geertz C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Erez M, Aycan Z (2007) Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Rev. Clinical Psych. 58:479–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J, Lim BC, Duan Let al. (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033):1100–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Zellmer-Bruhn ME (2001) Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):274–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilson L, Shalley CE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. J. Management 30(4):453–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):499–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godart FC, Maddux WW, Shipilov AV, Galinsky AD (2015) Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Acad. Management J. 58(1):195–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RV, Fernandez RM (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodology 19:89–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M (2006) Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organ. Sci. 17(3):367–384.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Vidmar N (1970) Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry 33(1):37–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF, Krippendorff K (2007) Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Comm. Methods Measures 1(1):77–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Liu L, Lyon J (2011) Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):135–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoever IJ, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP, Barkema HG (2012) Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. J. Appl. Psych. 97(5):982–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organ. Dynam. 9(1):42–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg MA (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(3):184–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, van Kleef GA, De Dreu, CKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong HJ (2010) Bicultural competence and its impact on team effectiveness. Internat. J. Cross Cultural Management 10(1):93–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong YY, Morris MW, Chiu CY, Benet-Martinez V (2000) Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. Amer. Psych. 55(7):709–720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations, Vol. 2 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Andrews SB, Knocke D, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 16 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 183–210.Google Scholar
  • Krippendorff K (2004) Reliability in content analysis. Human Comm. Res. 30(3):411–433.Google Scholar
  • Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddux WW, Galinsky AD (2009) Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(5):1047–1061.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden PV (1982) Restricted access in networks and models of power. Amer. J. Sociol. 88(4):686–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin L, Shao B (2016) Early immersive culture mixing: The Key to understanding cognitive and identity differences among multiculturals. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 47(10):1409–1429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath JE (1964) Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance, Vol. 14 (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Mead M, Metraux R (1953) The Study of Culture at a Distance (Berghahn Books, Oxford, NY).Google Scholar
  • Mednick S (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montagnon E (2012) International collaboration on BepiColombo. Acad. Sharing Knowledge Magazine 46(May):1–56.Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr RJ, Scott WR (2008) Institutional exceptions on global projects: A process model. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(4):562–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paulus PB, Brown VR (2003) Enhancing ideational creativity in groups. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 110–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer JT, Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL, Kim JW (2006) Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. 49(4):679–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput. 36(4):717–731, Chicago.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM, Agarwala-Rogers R (1976) Communication in Organizations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J. Soc. Issues 50(4):19–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shalley CE (1991) Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 76(2):179–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, Wolff KH, trans. (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
  • Solomon C (2016) A diverse Pixar crew grabs an Oscar nomination. New York Times (February 8), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/14/movies/a-diverse-pixar-crew-grabs-an-oscar-nomination.html?_r=2.Google Scholar
  • Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(4):690–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens FG, Plaut VC, Sanchez-Burks J (2008) Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 44(1):116–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tadmor CT, Tetlock PE (2006) Biculturalism: A model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 37(2):173–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tadmor CT, Satterstrom P, Jang S, Polzer JT (2012) Beyond individual creativity: The superadditive benefits of multicultural experience for collective creativity in culturally diverse teams. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 43(3):384–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin W, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
  • Taras V, Caprar D, Rottig D, Sarala R, Zakaria N, Zhao F, Jimenez Aet al. (2013) A global classroom? A multi-method evaluation of effectiveness of international collaboration exercises in international management education. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 12(3):414–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas DC, Brannen MY, Garcia D (2010) Bicultural individuals and intercultural effectiveness. Eur. J. Cross-Cultural Competence Management 1(4):315–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Torrance EP (1966) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B (Personnel Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, McEvily B, Krackhardt D (2014) Being a catalyst of innovation: The role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organ. Sci. 26(2):423–438.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Triandis HC, Hall ER, Ewen RB (1965) Member heterogeneity and dyadic creativity. Human Relations 18(1):33–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valacich JS, Dennis AR, Nunamaker JF (1992) Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Res. 23(1):49–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Clinical Psych. 58:515–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CK, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams KY, O’Reilly III CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
  • Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn M, Gibson C (2006) Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(3):501–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Maloney MM, Bhappu AD, Salvador RB (2008) When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):41–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.