Knowledge Creation Across Worldviews: How Metaphors Impact and Orient Group Creativity

References

• Baralou E, Tsoukas H (2015) How is new organizational knowledge created in a virtual context? An ethnographic study. Organ. Stud. 36(5):593–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Garud R (2009) The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(1):107–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Kahl SJ (2013) The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization and the plurality of analogies. Acad. Management J. 56(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black M (1962) Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Tenkasi RV (1995) Perspective making and perspective-taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4):350–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruns HC (2013) Working alone together: Coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Acad. Management J. 56(1):62–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive-capacity—A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collier J (1957) Photography in anthropology—A report on 2 experiments. Amer. Anthropology 59(5):843–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins H, Evans R, Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 38(4):657–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP (2005) Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):751–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Durand R (2014) Moving forward: Developing theoretical contributions in management studies. J. Management Stud. 51(6):995–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Kafouros M (2008) The emergent organization: Primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations. Organ. Stud. 29(7):957–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Oswick C, Christensen LT, Phillips N (2008) Metaphor in organizational research: Context, modalities and implications for research introduction. Organ. Stud. 29(1):7–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coulson S (2001) Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dittrich K, Guerard S, Seidl D (2016) Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organ. Sci. 27(3):678–697.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunbar K (1997) How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. Ward TB, Smith SM, Vaid J, eds. Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 461–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar K, Blanchette I (2001) The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends Cognitive Sci. 5(8):334–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2013) Sin-free ale: Non-alcoholic beer is taking off among Muslim consumers. (August 3), https://www.economist.com/news/business/21582531-non-alcoholic-beer-taking-among-muslim-consumers-sin-free-ale.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Endrissat N, Noppeney C (2013) Materializing the immaterial: Relational movements in a perfume’s becoming. Carlile P, Nicolini D, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 58–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewenstein B, Whyte J (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as “epistemic objects.” Organ. Stud. 30(1):7–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauconnier G, Turner M (1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Sci. 22(2):133–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman JA (2006) From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Galison P (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors P (2000) Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Garud R, Dunbar RLM, Bartel CA (2011) Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 22(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping—A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. 7(2):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D, Markman AB (1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. Amer. Psych. 52(1):45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs RW Jr (2008) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gick ML, Holyoak KJ (1980) Analogical problem-solving. Cognitive Psych. 12(3):306–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2013) A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(5):822–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbig B, Bussing A, Ewert T (2001) The role of tacit knowledge in the work context of nursing. J. Advanced Nursing 34(5):687–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiology 117(4):500–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstadter DR, Sander E (2013) Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Sci. 13(3):295–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irvine A (2011) Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: A comparative exploration. Internat. J. Qualitative Methods 10(3):202–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Allen Lane, London).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina KD (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Pergamon, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina KD (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovacs B, Johnson R (2014) Contrasting alternative explanations for the consequences of category spanning: A study of restaurant reviews and menus in San Francisco. Strategic Organ. 12(1):7–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kress GR, Van Leeuwen T (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed. (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakoff G (2008) The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century Politics With an 18th-Century Brain (Viking, New York).Google Scholar
• Lakoff G, Johnson M (2008) Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3):248–266.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, More PHB, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Mazzatenta A, Giugliano M, Campidelli S, Gambazzi L, Businaro L, Markram H, Prato Met al. (2007) Interfacing neurons with carbon nanotubes: Electrical signal transfer and synaptic stimulation in cultured brain circuits. J. Neuroscience 27(26):6931–6936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer RE, Hollerer MA, Jancsary D, Van Leeuwen T (2013) The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):489–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glick WH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. 40(1):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nersessian NJ (2008) Creating Scientific Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D, Mengis J, Swan J (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organ. Sci. 23(3):612–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Von Krogh G (2009) Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20(3):635–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Von Krogh G, Voelpel S (2006) Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ. Stud. 27(8):1179–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswick C, Jones P (2006) Beyond correspondence? Metaphor in organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):483–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswick C, Fleming P, Hanlon G (2011) From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):318–337.Google Scholar
• Oswick C, Keenoy T, Grant D (2002) Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organization theory: Beyond orthodoxy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):294–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2007) Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):781–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Ricœur P (2010). The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Schön DA (1993) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. Ortony A, ed. Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 243–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, O’Mahony S (2014) managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(3):691–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Thagard P (2012) The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H (1991) The missing link—A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):566–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):941–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky B (2011) Visualizing thought. Topics Cognitive Sci. 3(3):499–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K (1996) Prepare your organization to fight fires. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(3):143–146.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar