Networks and Innovation: Accounting for Structural and Institutional Sources of Recombination in Brokerage Triads

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Morris Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J (2006) Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Sci. 52(10):1457–1471.Link, Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Waterman RP (2002) Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol. Methodology 32(1):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Elder TE, Taber CR (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. J. Political Econom. 113(1):151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson U, Forsgren M, Holm U (2002) The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management J. 23(11):979–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Guillén MF, Zhou N (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(9):1460–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (Analytic Technologies, Inc., Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2015) Reinforced structural holes. Soc. Networks 43(October):149–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (1998) Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J. Marketing Res. 35(4):474–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP (2016) The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):621–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):159–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE, Bridges WP, O’Keefe RD (1984) Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Sci. 30(6):682–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Gould RV (1994) A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1455–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ (2014) Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(1):193–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Owen-Smith J (2016) A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Sci. 63(3):791–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2001) Distance still matters. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(8):137–147.Google Scholar
• Giovannetti GT, Morrison SW (2000) Convergence: The Biotechnology Industry Report. (Ernst & Young, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Gould RV, Fernandez RM (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodology 19(1989):89–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (1995) A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration. Acad. Management Proc. 1995(Supplement):17–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Nerkar A (2012) The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 33(5):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 21(4):473–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organ. Dynam. 9(1):42–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):146–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Szulanski G (2004) Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35(6):508–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson SC (1967) Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32(3):241–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones MC, Pewsey A (2009) Sinh-arcsinh distributions. Biometrika 96(4):761–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):317–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1988) Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management J. 9(4):319–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 19(3):411–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 24(4):625–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai R, D’Amour A, Yu A, Sun Y, Torvik V, Fleming L (2011) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database. Working paper, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lavie D ( 2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4):623–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1986) Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Sci. 32(2):173–181.Link, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(August):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moser P (2013) Patents and innovation: Evidence from economic history. J. Econom. Perspect. 27(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17(1):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Riccaboni M, Pammolli F, Powell WW (2002) A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Sci. 48(1):24–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Pachucki MA, Breiger RL (2010) Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36(August):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park WG (2008) International patent protection: 1960–2005. Res. Policy 37(4):761–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J, Shaver JM (2005) Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 26(2):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps CC (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A (2012) Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):1115–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philippidis A (2014) Top 25 biotech companies of 2014. Genetic Engrg. Biotechnology News (August 4), https://www.genengnews.com/the-lists/top-25-biotech-companies-of-2014/77900218.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Renyi A, Erdos P (1959) On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae 6(5):290–297.Google Scholar
• Rogan M, Sorenson O (2014) Picking a (poor) partner a relational perspective on acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):301–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Hess AM (2007) Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organ. Sci. 18(6):898–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Perennial, New York).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Simonin BL (2004) An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35(5):407–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Organizations and social structure. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago),142–193.Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2013) The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):645–663.Link, Google Scholar
• Vidal E, Mitchell W (2015) Adding by subtracting: The relationship between performance feedback and resource reconfiguration through divestitures. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1101–1118.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2011) The Geographic scope of the MNC and its alliance portfolio: Resolving the paradox of distance. Global Strategy J. 1(1):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9(2):141–159.Link, Google Scholar