Differential Firm Commitment to Industries Supported by Social Movement Organizations

References

• Aguirre M, Ibikunle G (2014) Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis. Energy Policy 69:374–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Andrews KT, Caren N (2010) Making the news movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aranda A, Simons T (2017) On two sides of the smoke screen: How activist organizations and corporations use protests and lobbying to influence institutional change. Briscoe F, King B, Leitzinger J, eds. Social Movements, Stakeholders and Non-Market Strategy: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Armingeon K, Knopfel L, Weisstaner D, Engler S, Potolidis P, Gerber M (2013) Comparative political data set III 1990–2011. Working paper, Institute of Political Science, University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA (2004) Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 7(2):127–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T, Child C (2011) Movements, markets and fields: The effects of anti-sweetshop campaigns on U.S. firms, 1993–2000. Soc. Forces 90(2):421–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Gelabert L, Massa-Saluzzo F, Rousseau HE (2016) Understanding community dynamics in the study of grand challenges: How nonprofits, institutional actors, and the community fabric interact to influence income inequality. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1940–1964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen F (2014) After Greenwashing: Symbolic Corporate Environmentalism and Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Safford S (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):460–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Gupta A, Anner MS (2015) Social activism and practice diffusion how activist tactics affect non-targeted organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):300–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlos C, Lewis B (2017) Strategic Silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print February 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217695089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlos WC, Sine WD, Lee BH, Haveman H (2014) Gone with the Wind: Industry development and the evolution of social movement influence. Working paper, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
• Castells M (1997) The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen MT (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis JE, Baer DE, Grabb EG (2001) Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(6):783–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis JE, Grabb EG, Baer DE (1992) Voluntary association membership in fifteen countries: A comparative analysis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(2):139–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalal DK, Zickar MJ (2012) Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organ. Res. Methods 15(3):339–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton RJ (2005) The greening of the globe? Cross-national levels of environmental group membership. Environment. Politics 14(4):441–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Sine WD, Haveman HA (2013) Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 24(2):356–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Thompson TA (1994) A social movement perspective on corporate control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekker P, Van den Broek A (1998) Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas 9(1):11–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management J. 29(10):1027–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R (2003) Predicting a firm’s forecasting ability: The roles of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention. Strategic Management J. 24(9):821–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Jacqueminet A (2015) Peer conformity, attention, and heterogeneous implementation of practices in MNEs. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(8):917–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Knott AM (2015) Time to exit: Rational, behavioral, and organizational delays. Strategic Management J. 36(7):957–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA) (2012) Global market outlook for photovoltaics until 2016. Accessed January 3, 2018, https://www.solarify.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/EPIA_Global-Market-Outlook-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
• European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA) (2008) Supporting solar photovoltaic electricity: An argument for feed-in tariffs. Accessed January 3, 2018, http://www.pvaustria.at/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/1721_An-Argument-for-Feed-in-Tariffs.pdf.Google Scholar
• European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA), Greenpeace (2001) Solar generation: Electricity for over 1 billion people and 2 million jobs by 2020. Accessed June 25, 2011, http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2006/3/solar-generation.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1173–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flamos A, Georgallis PG, Doukas H, Psarras J (2009) Policy oriented review for photovoltaics introduction in the EU. Internat. J. Renewable Energy Tech. 1(1):64–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransson N, Gärling T (1999) Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J. Environment. Psych. 19(4):369–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzen A, Meyer R (2010) Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 26(2):219–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamson WA, Meyer DS (1996) Framing political opportunity. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 275–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgallis P (2017) The link between social movements and corporate social initiatives: Toward a multi-level theory. J. Bus. Ethics 10:1–17.Google Scholar
• Georgallis PP, Durand R (2017) Achieving high growth in policy-dependent industries: Differences between startups and corporate-backed ventures. Long Range Planning 50(4):487–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Lieberman M (1987) Investment and coordination in oligopolistic industries. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):17–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenpeace (2018) Greenfreeze-How Greenpeace transformed the refrigeration industry in Europe and Asia. Accessed January 3, 2018, http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Global/usa/binaries/2009/4/greenfreeze-in-europe-and-asia.pdf.Google Scholar
• Greenpeace (2014) Energy revolution. Accessed January 3, 2018, http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Global/usa/planet3/PDFs/Solutions/Energy-Revolution-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• Grodal S (2017) Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print November 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217744555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Stern I (2004) Selection-based learning: The coevolution of internal and external selection in high-velocity environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):39–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson J, Cool K (2003) Learning to time capacity expansions: An empirical analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975–95. Strategic Management J. 24(5):393–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt S, Grandy J, Lee BH (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and us oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ (1999) Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Acad. Management J. 42(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoppmann J, Peters M, Schneider M, Hoffmann VH (2013) The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Res. Policy 42(4):989–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Yue LQ, Rao H (2010) Trouble in store: Probes, protests, and store openings by Wal-Mart, 1998–2007. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobsson S, Lauber V (2006) The politics and policy of energy system transformation—Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34(3):256–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobsson S, Andersson BA, Bangers L (2004) Transforming the energy system—The evolution of the German technological system for solar cells. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 16(1):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr NR (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kassinis G, Vafeas N (2006) Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Acad. Management J. 49(1):145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kayser S (2017) The negative relationship between event-specific corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. Briscoe F, King B, Leitzinger J, eds. Social Movements, Stakeholders and Non-Market Strategy: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, McDonnell MH (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: Toward Effective Global CSR Frameworks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans R (2009) Globalization or still national politics? A comparison of protests against the Gulf War in Germany, France, and the Netherlands. Della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D, eds. Social Movements in a Globalizing World, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 57–70.Google Scholar
• Kurland NB, McCaffrey SJ (2016) Social movement organization leaders and the creation of markets for “local” goods. Bus. Soc. 55(7):1017–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH (2009) The infrastructure of collective action and policy content diffusion in the organic food industry. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1247–1269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee B, Sine W (2007) Constructing entrepreneurial opportunity: Environmental movements and the transformation of regional regulatory regimes. Frenken K, ed. Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA), 93–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox MJ, Eesley CE (2009) Private Environmental activism and the selection and response of firm targets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18:45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2001) Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo J, Meier S, Oberholzer-Gee F (2012) No news is good news: CSR strategy and newspaper coverage of negative firm events. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Lyon TP, Montgomery AW (2015) The means and end of greenwash. Organ. Environment 28(2):223–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks G, McAdam D (2009) On the relationship of political opportunities to the form of collective action: The case of the European Union. Della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D, eds. Social Movements in a Globalizing World, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 97–111.Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King B (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):387–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG, Soule SA (2015) A dynamic process model of private politics activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(3):654–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McInerney PB (2014) From Social Movement to Moral Market: How the Circuit Riders Sparked an IT Revolution and Created a Technology Market (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara G, Bromiley P (1997) Decision making in an organizational setting: Cognitive and organizational influences on risk assessment in commercial lending. Acad. Management J. 40(5):1063–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y, Dykes BJ, Block ES, Pollock TG (2010) Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Acad. Management J. 53(4):701–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nesbit R, Gazley B (2012) Patterns of volunteer activity in professional associations and societies. Voluntas 23(3):558–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, Dean TJ (2015) Firm responses to social movement pressures: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1093–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, York JG, Hargrave TJ (2014) The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1609–1632.Link, Google Scholar
• Pacheco-De-Almeida G, Henderson JE, Cool KO (2008) Resolving the commitment versus flexibility trade-off: The role of resource accumulation lags. Acad. Management J. 51(3):517–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philippe D, Durand R (2011) The impact of norm-conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management J. 32(9):969–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pilati K (2013) Understanding social movements: Theories from the classical era to the present by Steven M. Buechler Paradigm Publishers. 2011. Soc. Forces 93(4):e104–e104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H (1998) Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):912–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J (2010) Beyond a subjective theory of value and towards a “fair price”: An organizational perspective on Fairtrade minimum price setting. Organization 17:563–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Ansari S (2013) Be fair or care? Fairtrade and the standardization of ethical practices. Acad. Management Proc. 2013(1):15766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera J (2010) Business and Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rootes C (2007) Environmental movements. Snow DA, Soule SA, Kriesi H, eds. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 608–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samdahl DM, Robertson R (1989) Social determinants of environmental concern specification and test of the model. Environment Behav. 21(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schifeling T (2013) Defense against Recession: US Business Mobilization, 1950–1970. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, King M, Smith T (2008) Social movements and organizational form: Cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy, and grain industries. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurman R (2004) Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Soc. Problems 51(2):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow D (2006) Framing and social movements. Ritzer G, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Vol. 4 (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 1780–1784.Google Scholar
• Snow D, Benford R (2009) Alternative types of cross-national diffusion in the social movement arena. Della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D, eds. Social Movements in a Globalizing World, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 23–39.Google Scholar
• Soule SA (2009) Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson SB (2011) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. J. Financial Econom. 99(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Liere KD, Dunlap RE (1980) The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quart. 44(2):181–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Wijk J, Stam W, Elfring T, Zietsma C, den Hond F (2013) Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution. Acad. Management J. 56(2):358–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vancouver JB, Carlson BW (2015) All things in moderation, including tests of mediation (at least some of the time). Organ. Res. Methods 18(1):70–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasi IB (2011) Winds of Change: The Environmental Movement and the Global Development of the Wind Energy Industry (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasi IB, King BG (2012) Social movements, risk perceptions, and economic outcomes: The effect of primary and secondary stakeholder activism on firms’ perceived environmental risk and financial performance. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(4):573–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasi IB, King BG (2015) Going green and risky businesses: The adoption and growth of green power programs in the United States. Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
• Von Stein J (2008) The international law and politics of climate change ratification of the United Nations framework convention and the Kyoto Protocol. J. Conflict Resolution 52(2):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldron TL, Navis C, Fisher G (2013) Explaining differences in firms’ responses to activism. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):397–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker ET, Martin AW, McCarthy JD (2008) Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(1):35–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Soderstrom S (2012) Social movements. Bansal P, Hoffman AJ, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 248–268.Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Rao H, Thomas LG (2009) From streets to suites: How the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, Lenox MJ (2014) Exploring the sociocultural determinants of de novo versus de alio entry in emerging industries. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1930–1951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yue LQ, Luo J, Ingram P (2013) The failure of private regulation: Elite control and market crises in the Manhattan banking industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):37–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):189–221.Crossref, Google Scholar