An Innovation Theory of Headquarters Value in Multibusiness Firms

References

• Adner RD, Levinthal D (2001) Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. 47(5):611–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Harris C, Howitt P, Vickers J (2001) Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(3):467–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C, Tandon V (2008) Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akhavein J, Frame WS, White LJ (2005) The diffusion of financial innovations: An examination of the adoption of small business credit scoring by large banking organizations. J. Bus. 78(2):577–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Greve HR (2007) A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardolet D, Lovallo D, Rumelt R (2010) The hand of corporate management in capital allocations: Patterns of investment in multi- and single-business firms. Indust. Corporate Change 19(2):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batiz-Lazo B, Wood D (2002) A historical appraisal of information technology in commercial banking. Electronic Markets 12(3):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Hancock D, Humphrey D (1993) Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. J. Banking Finance 17(2/3):317–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Lingblad M (2005) Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organ. Sci. 16(6):674–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton MK (1993) Organizational innovation and substandard performance: When is necessity the mother of innovation? Organ. Sci. 4(1):57–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker G (1961) The Management of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cebenoyan A, Papaioannou G, Travlos N (1992) Foreign takeover activity in the United States and wealth effects for target firm shareholders. Financial Management 21(3):58–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A (1990) Scale and Scope (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Hall B, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 129–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Klepper S (1996) A reprise of size and R&D. Econom. J. 106(437):925–951.Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Collis D, Montgomery C (2004) Corporate Strategy: A Resource-Based Approach (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Dang VA, Kim M, Shin Y (2015) In search of robust methods for dynamic panel data models in empirical corporate finance. J. Banking Finance 53:84–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darr E, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1980) Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Econom. J. 90(358):266–293.Google Scholar
• Dearden J, Ickes B, Samuelson L (1990) To innovate or not to innovate: Incentives and innovation in hierarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(5):1105–1124.Google Scholar
• Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2017) Declining dynamism, allocative efficiency, and the productivity slowdown. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):322–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J, Thomas A (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhout J, Jovanovic B (2002) Knowledge spillovers and inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1290–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everaert G, Pozzi L (2007) Bootstrap-based bias correction for dynamic panels. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 31(4):1160–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling M (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flannery MJ, Hankins KW (2013) Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance. J. Corporate Finance 19:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan TH, McDowell JM (1984) Market concentration and the diffusion of new technology in the banking industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 66(4):686–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit firms. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Hermalin B, Wallace N (1994) The determinants of efficiency and solvency in savings and loans. RAND J. Econom. 25(3):361–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Murillo R, Llobet G, Fuentes R (2010) Strategic online banking adoption. J. Banking Finance 34(7):1650–1663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, He ZL, Blettner DP, Bettis RA (2017) Conflict inside and outside: Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1435–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2001) The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. 47(3):430–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2002) Exploration and exploitation as complements. Choo CW, Bontis N, eds. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 339–358.Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2008) R&D/Returns causality: Absorptive capacity or organizational IQ. Management Sci. 54(12):2054–2067.Link, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2017) How Innovation Really Works: Using the Trillion-Dollar R&D Fix to Drive Growth (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Posen H (2005) Is failure good? Strategic Management J. 26(7):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Posen H, Wu B (2009) Spillover asymmetry and why it matters. Management Sci. 55(3):373–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2002) Where does State Street lead? A first look at finance patents, 1971-2000. J. Finance 57(2):901–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2006) The new new financial thing: The origin of financial innovations. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):223–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Reiss PC (1984) Tests of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. Griliches Z, ed. R&D, Patents, and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 175–204.Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Reiss PC (1988) Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):538–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J, Simon H (1958) Organizations (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Mester L (1993) Efficiency in the savings and loan industry. J. Banking Finance 17(2–3):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ, Fern MJ, Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 50(2):307–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan DP, Rime B, Strahan PE (2004) Bank integration and state business cycles. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4):1555–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Publishing, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Posen H, Lee J, Yi S (2013) The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R (1974) Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rumelt R, Schendel D, Teece D (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy (HBS Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM (1967) Research and development resource allocation under rivalry. Quart. J. Econom. 81(3):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro G (2011) The Comeback: How Innovation Will Restore the American Dream (Beaufort Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1):101–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (2000) Appropriability and the challenge of scope: Banc One routinizes replication. Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York), 69–98.Google Scholar
• Uyterhoeven H, Hart M (1993) BANC ONE—1993. Harvard Business School Case 394-043 (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• Vieregger C (2013) Three essays on strategic capital allocation. PhD dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar