Performance Feedback in Hierarchical Business Groups: The Cross-Level Effects of Cognitive Accessibility on R&D Search Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1237

References

  • Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A (2000) Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78:53–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison PD (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factor expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52:83–94.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bae K-H, Kang J-K, Kim J-M (2002) Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. J. Finance 57:2695–2740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baek J-S, Kang J-K, Lee I (2006) Business groups and tunneling: Evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols. J. Finance 61:2415–2449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bargh J (1982) Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43:425–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R, Kenny D (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mehta P, Mullainathan S (2002) Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quart. J. Econom. 117:121–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Weight vs. voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. 51:577–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois III LJ (1981) On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. 6:29–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle E, Shapira Z (2012) The liability of leading: Battling aspiration and survival goals in Jeopardy’s Tournament of Champions. Organ. Sci. 23:1100–1113.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J, Fazzari S, Petersen B (2009) Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity and the 1990s R&D boom. J. Finance 64:151–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A (1962) Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chang SJ (2003) Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Acad. Management J. 46:238–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang SJ, Choi U (1988) Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups: A transactions cost approach. J. Indust. Econom. 37:141–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang SJ, Hong J (2000) Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Acad. Management J. 43:429–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang SJ, Chung C-N, Mahmood IP (2006) When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organ. Sci. 17:637–656.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W-R, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28:369–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 25:975–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6:1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Klepper S (1992) The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Bus. Econom. 4:1–14.Google Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Duchin R, Ozbas O, Sensoy B (2010) Costly external finance, corporate investment, and the subprime mortgage credit crisis. J. Financial Econom. 97:418–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20:461–477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Taylor S (2013) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N (1985) The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919-1979. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50:377–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeland RF (1996) The myth of the M-form? Governance, consent, and organizational change. Amer. J. Sociol. 102:483–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24:1102–1119.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (1996) The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. 7:255–282.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and restructuring for the future. Organ. Sci. 18:523–536.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6:1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P, Khanna T (1998) The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. J. Indust. Econom. 46:35–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goold M, Campbell A (1987) Strategies and Styles (Blackwell, Oxford).Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M (2005) Business groups and social organization. Smelser N, Swedberg R, eds. Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 429–450.Google Scholar
  • Greve HR (1998) Performance aspirations and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43:58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003a) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003b) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46:685–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2008) A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad. Management J. 51:476–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guillén MF (2000) Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Acad. Management J. 43:362–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen GS, Hill CWL (1991) Are institutional investors myopic? A time-series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic Management J. 12:1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris J, Bromiley P (2007) Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. 18:350–367.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat CE (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40:1720–1747.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET, Bargh JA (1987) Social cognition and social perception. Annual Rev. Psych. 38:369–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET, King G (1981) Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. Cantor N, Kihlstrom J, eds. Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 69–121.Google Scholar
  • Hitt M, Bierman L, Uhlenbruck K, Shimizu K (2006) The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad and the ugly. Acad. Management J. 49:1137–1157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann DA (1997) An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Management 23:723–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoskisson R, Hitt M (1988) Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms. Strategic Management J. 9:605–622.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51:808–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph J, Ocasio W (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management J. 33:633–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A, Beckman C, Moliterno T (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2): 228–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Henderson R (2005) Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organ. Sci. 16:509–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance 55:867–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T, Rivkin JW (2001) Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. 22:45–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance 65:471–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo X, Chung C (2005) Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50:404–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee J, Galinsky A (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2:351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics 24:662–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33:1404–1418.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99:172–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moliterno TP, Beck N, Beckman CM, Meyer M (2014) Knowing your place: Social performance feedback in good times and bad times. Organ. Sci. 25:1684–1702.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nadkarni S, Chen J (2014) Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 57:1810–1833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49:1417–1426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1995) The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 17 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 287–331.Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Org. Sci. 22:1286–1296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6:239–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ref O, Shapira Z (2017) Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and well below and above it. Strategic Management J. 38:1416–1434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiffrin R, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psych. Rev. 84:127–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H (1976) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Snijders T, Bosker R (2011) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe AL (1990) Information and Organizations (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21:791–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B, Greve H, Chen W-R (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: responsiveness and focus of attention. Organ. Sci. 21:696–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whittington R, Mayer M (2000) The European corporation: Strategy, structure, and social science (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson O (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.