Does the Middle Conform or Compete? Quality Thresholds Predict the Locus of Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1240

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapat RB, Beg MI (1989) Order statistics for nonidentically distributed variables and permanents. Sankhya Indian J. Statist. 51(1):79–93.Google Scholar
  • Barnett WP (2008) The Red Queen (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang Y-T (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bothner MS, Kang J-H, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):208–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman NA, Bastedo MN (2009) Getting on the front page: Organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U.S. News and World Report on student decisions. Res. Higher Ed. 50(5):415–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle E, Shapira Z (2012) The liability of leading: Battling aspiration and survival goals in the Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1100–1113.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Briscoe F, Safford S (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):460–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown KC, Harlow W, Starks LT (1996) Of tournaments and temptations: An analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry. J. Finance 51(1):85–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral LMB (2003) R&D competition when firms choose variance. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):139–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1990) Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(6):1401–1440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliashberg J, Elberse A, Leenders MAAM (2006) The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Sci. 25(6):638–661.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser R (1963) Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. Amer. Psych. 18(8): 519–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003b) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2003) The fog of change: Opacity and asperity in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):399–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hörner J (2004) A perpetual race to stay ahead. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(4):1065–1088.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G (2006a) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15(3):467–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G (2006b) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51(4):808–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015). Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaniel R, Parham R (2017) WSJ Category Kings—The impact of media attention on consumer and mutual fund investment decisions. J. Financial Econom. 123(2):337–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG, Pearce NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36(1):249–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Hannan MT (2015) Conceptual spaces and the consequences of category spanning. Sociol. Sci. 2(May):252–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Liu C (2016) Audience structure and status multiplicity. Soc. Networks 44(January):36–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman DW, Kovács B, Carroll GR (2014) Conflicting social codes and organizations: Hygiene and authenticity in consumer evaluations of restaurants. Organ. Sci. 60(10):2602–2617.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D, Chen M-J (1994) Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohn K (2008) Efforts and efficiency in oil exploration: A vector error-correction approach. Energy J. 29(4):53–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Natriello G (1987) The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psych. 22(2):155–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) Organizational capabilities and behavior. An Evolutionary of Economic Change Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (2008) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Pratt JW (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1):122–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rossman G, Schilke O (2014) Close, but no cigar: The bimodal rewards to prize-seeking. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):86–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):63–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Poon EG, Orav EJ, Lo HG, Williams DH, Bates DW (2007) Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: A statewide survey. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 14(1):110–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simtowe F, Mduma J, Phiri A, Thomas A, Zeller M (2006) Can risk-aversion towards fertilizer explain part of the non-adoption puzzle for hybrid maize? Empirical evidence from Malawi. J. Appl. Sci. 6(7):1490–1498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart SM, Gruys ML, Storm M (2010) Forced distribution performance evaluation systems: Advantages, disadvantages and keys to implementation. J. Management Organ. 16(1):168–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White HC (1981) Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3):517–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim TY, Ukanwa K, Rittmann JV (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.