Interdependence, Perception, and Investment Choices: An Experimental Approach to Decision Making in Innovation Ecosystems

References

• Adner R (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(4):98–107.Google Scholar
• Adner R (2013) The Wide Lens: What Successful Innovators See that Others Miss (Penguin/Portfolio, New York).Google Scholar
• Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 30(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Reexamining technology S-curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Hillel M (1973) On the subjective probability of compound events. Organ. Behav. Human Performance. 9(3):396–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Moore DA (2012) Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 8th ed. (Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Greenstein S, Brownstone D, Flamm K (1996) Technical progress and co-invention in computing and in the uses of computers. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1996(1):1–83.Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Paruchuri S, Idson LC, Higgins ET (2002) Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weber R (2013) Experimental organizational economics. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 213–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1977) Organizational Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organizational design: Rethinking design in inter-organizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M (2009) Collaboration: How Leaders Avoid the Traps, Build Common Ground, and Reap Big Results (Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• Hirschleifer J (1983) From weakest-link to best-shot: The voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice 41(3):371–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr N (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khemlani S, Lotstein M, Johnson-Laird P (2015) Naive probability: Model-based estimates of unique events. Cognitive Sci. 39(6):1216–1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez M, Camerer C (1994) Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in ‘weakest-link’ games. Strategic Management J. 15(1):101–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston).Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch ES (2001) Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. 127(2):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantovani A, Ruiz-Aliseda F (2016) Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Sci. 62(2):534–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Flynn FJ (2008) The case for behavioral decision research in organizational behavior. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):399–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3):75–86.Google Scholar
• Nilsson H, Rieskamp J, Jenny M (2013) Exploring the overestimation of conjunctive probabilities. Frontiers Psych. 4(101):1–12.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Approach (Harper and Row Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Puranam P, Warglien M (2015) Object salience in the division of labor: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 62(7):2110–2128.Link, Google Scholar
• Riedl A, Rohde I, Strobel M (2016) Efficient coordination in weakest-link games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):737–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1976) Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y, Hsee CK (2001) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of probability weighting. Psych. Sci. 12(3):185–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1992) Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2nd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD (2006) Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 135(3):409–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Peters E (2006) Risk perception and affect. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 15(6):322–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2002) The affect heuristic. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, New York), 397–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Strahan & Cadell, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Milkman KL, Fox CR (2012) The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum D, Fox CR, Ülkümen G (2016) Judgment extremity and accuracy under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty. Management Sci. 63(2):497–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1983) Extension vs. intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psych. Rev. 90(4):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, Strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
• Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Liu Q (2016) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar