Thinking Broad and Deep: Why Some Directors Exert an Outsized Influence on Strategic Change

REFERENCES

• Acharya AG, Pollock TG (2013) Shoot for the stars? Predicting the recruitment of prestigious directors at newly public firms. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1396–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB (2003) What do boards do? Evidence from board committee and director compensation data. Working paper, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.Google Scholar
• Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett SM, Koslowski B (2002) Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking Reasoning 8(4):237–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barreto I (2010) Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. J. Management 36(1):256–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bassok M, Holyoak KJ (1989) Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 15(1):153–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2008) Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition 108(3):652–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1997) Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Management J. 40(1):152–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (2000) Learning and transfer. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (National Academy Press, Washington DC), 51–78.Google Scholar
• Bransford JD, Stein BS (1993) The IDEAL Problem Solver (W. H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Bruton GD, Filatotchev I, Chahine S, Wright M (2010) Governance, ownership structure, and performance of IPO firms: The impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments. Strategic Management J. 31(5):491–509.Google Scholar
• Business Roundtable (2016) Principles of corporate governance. Report, Business Roundtable, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Carey S (1985) Conceptual Change in Childhood (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Westphal JD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 44(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST (2003) Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):432–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase W, Simon H (1973) Skill in chess. Amer. Scientist 61(4):394–403.Google Scholar
• Chi MT, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sci. 5(2):121–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossland C, Zyung J, Hiller NJ, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Acad. Management J. 57(3):652–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, McDougall PP, Covin JG, Dalton DR (2002) Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. J. Management 28(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):33–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dearborn DC, Simon HA (1958) Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 21(2):140–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson K (2006) The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge University Press, New York), 685–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Charness N (1994) Expert performance. Amer. Psych. 49(8):725–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Lehmann AC (1996) Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Rev. Psych. 47(1):273–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Smith J (1991) Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (1994) Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise, diversification and resource-related industry groups. Organ. Sci. 5(2):185–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I, Allcock D (2013) Corporate governance in IPOs. Wright M, Siegel DS, Keasey K, Filatotchev I, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 421–448.Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I, Bishop K (2002) Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’of UK IPO firms. Strategic Management J. 23(10):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I, Wright M, Arberk M (2006) Venture capitalists, syndication and governance in initial public offerings. Small Bus. Econom. 26(4):337–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2003) Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Acad. Management Executive 17(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick D, Cannella A (2008) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gardner HK, Gino F, Staats BR (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Acad. Management J. 55(4):998–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg S (2013) Venture boards: Distinctive monitoring and implications for firm performance. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):90–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg S, Eisenhardt K (2017) Unpacking the CEO–board relationship: How strategy making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1828–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg S, Furr N (2017) Venture boards: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):326–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser R, Chi MTH (1988) Overview. Chi M, Glaser R, Farr M, eds. The Nature of Expertise (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), xv–xxviii.Google Scholar
• Golden BR, Zajac EJ (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodstein J, Boeker W (1991) Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(2):306–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greeno JG, Moore JL, Smith DR (1993) Transfer of situated learning. Detterman DK, Sternberg RJ, eds. Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction (Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT), 99–167.Google Scholar
• Gruber M (2010) Exploring the origins of organizational paths: Empirical evidence from newly founded firms. J. Management 36(5):1143–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber M, Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2013) Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Management Sci. 59(4):837–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, D’Aveni RA (1992) Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Sci. 38(10):1445–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D, Misangyi V, Park C (2015) The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):323–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatano G (1982) Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. Quart. Newsletter Laboratory Comparative Human Cognition 4(1):15–18.Google Scholar
• Hatano G, Inagaki K (1984) Two courses of expertise. Research and Clinical Center for Child Development, vol. 6 (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), 27–36.Google Scholar
• Hayes RM, Mehran H, Schaefer S (2004) Board committee structures, ownership, and firm performance. Working paper, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
• Haynes KT, Hillman A (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoisl K, Gruber M, Harhoff D (2010) Invention processes and knowledge recombination across technological boundaries. Proc. Druid Summer Conf. (Imperial College, London).Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ (1991) Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. Ericsson KA, Smith J, eds. Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 301–355.Google Scholar
• Hovland C, Janis I, Kelley H (1963) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Jain BA, Kini O (2000) Does the presence of venture capitalists improve the survival profile of IPO firms? J. Bus. Finance Accounting 27(9–10):1139–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson SG, Schnatterly K, Hill AD (2013) Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. J. Management 39(1):232–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Klein G (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. Amer. Psych. 64(6):515–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaufman DQ, Stasson MF, Hart JW (1999) Are the tabloids always wrong or is that just what we think? Need for cognition and perceptions of articles in print media. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 29(9):1984–2000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY, Misangyi VF (2008) Outside directors’ industry‐specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management J. 29(12):1345–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Moore JH (2002) Executive migration and institutional change. Acad. Management J. 45(1):120–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Semadeni M, Cannella AA (2013) External COO/presidents as expert directors: A new look at the service role of boards. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1628–1641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll M, Walters BA, Wright P (2008) Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management J. 29(4):363–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester RH, Hillman A, Zardkoohi A, Cannella AA (2008) Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Acad. Management J. 51(5):999–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky S, Little D, Kalish ML (2007) Knowledge and expertise. Durso FT, Nickerson RS, Dumais ST, Lewandowsky S, Perfect TJ, eds. Handbook of Applied Cognition (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 83–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovallo D, Clarke C, Camerer C (2012) Robust analogizing and the outside view: two empirical tests of case‐based decision making. Strategic Management J. 33(5):496–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lungeanu R, Stern I, Zajac EJ (2016) When do firms change technology-sourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack. Strategic Management J. 37(5):855–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynall MD, Golden BR, Hillman AJ (2003) Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):416–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL (2014) Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psych. Sci. 25(8):1608–1618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansharamani V (2012) All hail the generalist. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June 4), https://hbr.org/2012/06/all-hail-the-generalist.Google Scholar
• Marton F, Booth SA (1997) Learning and Awareness (Psychology Press, Hove, UK).Google Scholar
• McCain BE, O’Reilly C, Pfeffer J (1983) The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. Acad. Management J. 26(4):626–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD, Graebner ME (2008) What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic Management J. 29(11):1155–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinnies E (1973) Initial attitude, source credibility, and involvement as factors in persuasion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 9(4):285–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinnies E, Ward CD (1980) Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 6(3):467–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy GL, Medin DL (1985) The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psych. Rev. 92(3):289–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Wegener DT, White PH (1998) Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Soc. Cognition 16(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Chen G, Jackson EM, Hambrick DC (2010) How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):6–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP (1999) What corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. J. Management Stud. 36(7):953–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Morrison JB, Carroll JS (2009) The dynamics of action-oriented problem solving: Linking interpretation and choice. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):733–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samter W, Burleson BR (1990) Evaluations of communication skills as predictors of peer acceptance in a group living situation. Comm. Stud. 41(4):311–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders WG, Carpenter MA (1998) Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of ceo compensation, top team composition, and board. Acad. Management J. 41(2):158–178.Google Scholar
• Schuyler D (2003) Cognitive Therapy: A Practical Guide (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Schwartz DL, Bransford JD, Sears D (2005) Efficiency and innovation in transfer. Mestre JP, ed. Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC), 1–51.Google Scholar
• Simon H, Chase W (1988) Skill in chess. Levy D, ed. Computer Chess Compendium (Springer, Berlin), 175–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2008) Directors face tough tests. Financial Times (May 7), https://www.ft.com/content/dac37d10-1c47-11dd-8bfc-000077b07658.Google Scholar
• Strine LE, Hamermesh LA, Balotti RF, Gorris J (2010) Loyalty’s core demand: The defining role of good faith in corporation law. Georgetown Law J. 98(3):629–696.Google Scholar
• Tormala ZL, Briñol P, Petty RE (2006) When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(5):684–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Management J. 42(1):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Withers MC, Hillman AJ, Cannella AA Jr (2012) A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. J. Management 38(1):243–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yonelinas AP (2002) The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. J. Memory Language 46(3):441–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zald MN (1969) The power and functions of boards of directors: A theoretical synthesis. Amer. J. Sociol. 75(1):97–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R (2008) The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management J. 29(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar