An Integrative Perspective of Organizational Responses: Routines, Heuristics, and Improvisations in a Mount Everest Expedition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1271

References

  • Aldrich HE (1999) Organizations Evolving (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
  • Baker T, Miner A, Eesley D (2003) Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Res. Policy 32(2):255–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bastien DT, Hostager TJ (1992) Cooperation as communicative accomplishment: A symbolic interaction analysis of an improvised jazz concert. Comm. Stud. 43(2):92–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B, Okhuysen G (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker M (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4):643–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Berliner PF (1994) Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigley G, Roberts K (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1281–1299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bordieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S, Eisenhardt KM (1998) Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
  • Cattani G, Ferriani S, Frederiksen L, Täube F, eds. (2011) Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 28 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
  • Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corley KG, Gioia DA (2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):173–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunha MP, Cunha JV, Kamoche K (1999) Organizational improvisation: What when, how and why. Internat. J. Management Rev. 1(3):299–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1992) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeFilippi RJ, Arthur MB (1998) Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film making. Calif. Management Rev. 40(2):125–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess GG, Beard DW (1994) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Sull D (2001) Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January):106–116.Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Bingham CB (2010) Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263–1273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fayed N, Modrego PJ, Morales H (2006) Evidence of brain damage after high-altitude climbing by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Amer. J. Medicine 119(2):168.e1–168.e6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):505–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Gillman P, ed. (1993) Everest: The Best Writing and Pictures from Seventy Years of Human Endeavor (Little Brown and Company, London).Google Scholar
  • Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 62:451–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Thomas JB, Clark SM, Chittipeddi K (1994) Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organ. Sci. 5(3):363–383.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G (1996) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal S, Nelson A, Siino R (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hawkins AJ, O’Kane S (2018) Tesla built a giant tent to expand production of the Model 3. The Verge (June 22), https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/22/17488372/tesla-model-3-production-tent-expand.Google Scholar
  • Higgins T (2017) Tesla Model 3 arrives as Elon Musk warns of “manufacturing hell.” Wall Street Journal (July 29), https://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-model-3-arrives-as-elon-musk-tries-to-manage-expectations-1501234208.Google Scholar
  • Hmieleski KM, Corbett A, Baron RA (2013) Entrepreneurs’ improvisational behavior and firm performance: a study of dispositional and environmental moderators. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(2):138–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. (1982) Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Kernfeld B (1995) What to Listen for in Jazz (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A, Abdallah C (2011) Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management: Building methodological bridges. Res. Methodology Strategy Management 6:201–235.Google Scholar
  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Lazaric N, Mangolte P-A (1998) Routines et mémoire organisationelle: un questionement critique de la perspective cognitiviste. Revue Internationale de Systémique 12:27–49.Google Scholar
  • Locke K (1996) A funny thing happened! The management of consumer emotions in service encounters. Organ. Sci. 7(1):40–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loock M, Hinnen G (2015) Heuristics in organizations: A review and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 68(9):2027–2036.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magni M, Maruping LM, Hoegl M, Proserpio L (2013) Managing the unexpected across space: Improvisation, dispersion and performance in NPD teams. J. Product Innovation Management 30(5):1009–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maitlis S, Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):57–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa S, Hollingshead A (2007) Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. 18(1):147–161.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mangham IL, Pye A, eds. (1991) Organization Analysis and Development, vol. 22 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Olsen JP (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway).Google Scholar
  • Meyer A, Frost PJ, Weick KE (1998) The Organization Science Jazz Festival: Improvisation as a metaphor for organizing. Organ. Sci. 9(5):540–542.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Miner AS, Bassoff P, Moorman C (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):304–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C, Miner AS (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):696–723.Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press/ Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Newell A, Shaw J, Simon H (1962) Empirical explorations of the logic theory machine: A case study in heuristic. J. Symbolic Logic 27(1):102–103.Google Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Rueter H (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry RW, Lidell MK, Tierney KJ (2001) Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States (Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Salisbury R, Hawley E (2012) The Himalaya by Numbers: A Statistical Analysis of Mountaineering in the Nepal Himalaya (Vajra Publications Mountaineers Books, Seattle).Google Scholar
  • Schön D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Scott RW (1992) Organizations. Rational, Natural and Open Systems (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sewell W (1992) A theory structure: Duality, agency and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharfman MP, Dean J (1991) Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. J. Management 17(4):681–700.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spolin V (1963) Improvisation for the Theater: A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Sull D, Eisenhardt KM (2015) Simple Rules: How to Thrive in a Complex World (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
  • Teece DJ (2007) Explaining dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGrawHill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unsworth W (1991) Everest: The Ultimate Book of the Ultimate Mountain (Grafton Books, Harper Collins, London).Google Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):539–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1988) Tales of the Field (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Venables S (1989) Everest, Kangshung Face (Hodder and Stoughton, London).Google Scholar
  • Vera D, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ. Sci. 16(3):203–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1969) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sense-making in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):628–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1998) Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. 9(5):543–555.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2001) Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.