Why Managers Do Not Seek Voice from Employees: The Importance of Managers’ Personal Control and Long-Term Orientation

References

• Aguinis H, Bradley KJ (2014) Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organ. Res. Methods 17(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anicich EM, Hirsh JB (2017) Why being a middle manager is so exhausting. Accessed August 2, 2018, https://hbr.org/2017/03/why-being-a-middle-manager-is-so-exhausting.Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Tsui AS (1991) Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Acad. Management J. 34(2):251–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, De Stobbeleir KEM, Nujella M (2016) To seek or not to seek: Is that the only question? Recent developments in feedback-seeking literature. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(1):213–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Sutcliffe KM, Christianson MK (2009) Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. Greenberg J, Edwards M, eds. Voice and Silence in Organizations (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 175–202.Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK (1993) Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 78(1):111–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden WO, Money RB, Nevins JL (2006) A measure of long-term orientation: Development and validation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 34(3):456–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell NE, Staw BM (1989) People as sculptors vs. sculpture: The roles of personality and personal control in organizations. Arthur MB, Hall DT, Lawrence BS, eds. Handbook of Career Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 232–251.Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Chen YR (2012) Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(5):994–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Grant AM (2016) The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):599–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Turnley WH, Niehoff BP (2004) The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resources Management Rev. 14(2):229–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brehm S, Brehm JW (1981) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Spreitzer G, Mishra A, Hochwarter W, Pepper L, Weinberg J (2004) Perceived control as an antidote to the negative effects of layoffs on survivors’ organizational commitment and job performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):76–100.Google Scholar
• Burris ER (2012) The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 55(4):851–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burris ER, Detert JR, Romney AC (2013) Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organ. Sci. 24(1):22–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Bates JI, Marin A, Meddings K (2007) The stress of leadership. Accessed September 2, 2018, https://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/StressofLeadership.pdf.Google Scholar
• Castillo EA, Trinh MP (2018) In search of missing time: A review of the study of time in leadership research. Leadership Quart. 29(1):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D (2001a) Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ. Res. Methods 4(1):62–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA (2001b) Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(2):173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Folger R (1989) Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. J. Appl. Psych. 74(2):293–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currie G, Procter SJ (2005) The antecedents of middle managers’ strategic contribution: The case of a professional bureaucracy. J. Management Stud. 42(7):1325–1356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Tregaskis O, Seaton JS (2007) Job control and occupational health: The moderating role of national R&D activity. J. Organ. Behav. 28(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCelles KA, DeRue DS, Margolis JD, Ceranic TL (2012) Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 97(3):681–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSimone JA, Harms PD (2017) Dirty data: The effects of screening respondents who provide low-quality data in survey research. J. Bus. Psych. 33(5):559–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Management J. 50(4):869–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2007) Why employees are afraid to speak. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(5):23–25.Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2011) Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad. Management J. 54(3):461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Treviño LK (2010) Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organ. Sci. 21(1):249–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER, Harrison DA, Martin SR (2013) Voice flows to and around leaders: Understanding when units are helped or hurt by employee voice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(4):624–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drucker PF (1988) The coming of the new organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66(1):45–53.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farh CIC, Chen G (2018) Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model. J. Appl. Psych. 103(1):97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fast NJ, Burris ER, Bartel CA (2014) Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1013–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fetchenhauer D, Rohde PA (2002) Evolutionary personality psychology and victimology. Evolution Human Behav. 23(4):233–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R, Skarlicki DP (1998) When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Acad. Management J. 41(1):79–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R, Rosenfield D, Grove J, Corkran L (1979) Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(12):2253–2261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frese M, Fay D (2001) Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Res. Organ. Behav. 23:133–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fried Y, Ferris GR (1987) The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta‐analysis. Personality Psych. 40(2):287–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J. Organ. Behav. 27(8):1089–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Deci EL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26(4):331–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):393–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Ashford SJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Parker SK (2009) Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):317–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Eskew DE (1993) The role of role playing in organizational research. J. Management 19(2):221–241.Google Scholar
• Greenberger DB, Strasser S (1986) Development and application of a model of personal control in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 11(1):164–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haselhuhn MP, Wong EM, Ormiston ME (2017) With great power comes shared responsibility: Psychological power and the delegation of authority. Personality Individual Differences 108(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Huang JL, Bowling NA, Liu M, Li Y (2014) Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: Evaluating validity and participant reactions. J. Bus. Psych. 30(2):299–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huy QN (2001) In praise of middle managers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(8):72–79.Google Scholar
• Ignatius A (2014) Who can really take on short-termism? Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(1/2):14.Google Scholar
• Joireman J, King S (2016) Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 10(5):313–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joireman J, Kamdar D, Daniels D, Duell B (2006) Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1307–1320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Bono JE, Locke EA (2000) Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):237–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1993) Men and Women of the Corporation, 2nd ed. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kooij DTAM, Kanfer R, Betts M, Rudolph CW (2018) Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 103(8):867–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ (2001) How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(5):632–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Lam B (2015) The secret suffering of the middle manager. The Atlantic (August 27), https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/08/middle-managers-stress-depression/402193/.Google Scholar
• Lam CF, Mayer DM (2014) When do employees speak up for their customers? A model of voice in a customer service context. Personality Psych. 67(3):637–666.Google Scholar
• Li AN, Liao H, Tangirala S, Firth BM (2017) The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains. J. Appl. Psych. 102(8):1259–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Likert R (1961) New Patterns of Management (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Model. 9(2):151–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little TD, Rhemtulla M, Gibson K, Schoemann AM (2013) Why the items vs. parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psych. Methods 18(3):285–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace KJ, Manz CC, Alves JC (2007) Work stress and leadership development: The role of self-leadership, shared leadership, physical fitness and flow in managing demands and increasing job control. Human Resources Management Rev. 17(4):374–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Personality Psych. 64(3):559–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinko MJ, Gardner WL (1982) Learned helplessness: An alternative explanation for performance deficits. Acad. Management Rev. 7(2):195–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsunaga M (2008) Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Comm. Methods Measures 2(4):260–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maynes TD, Podsakoff PM (2014) Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 99(1):87–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClean EJ, Burris ER, Detert JR (2013) When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Acad. Management J. 56(2):525–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinney R, McMahon M, Walsh P (2013) Danger in the middle: Why middle managers aren’t ready to lead. Accessed September 2, 2018, http://www.harvardbusiness.org/sites/default/files/PDF/17807_CL_MiddleManagers_White_Paper_March2013.pdf.Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Morrison EW, Hewlin PF (2003) An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1453–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mischel W (2004) Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Rev. Psych. 55(1968):1–22.Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (1994) Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1543–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2014) Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):173–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in healthcare teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen K, Cleal B (2011) Under which conditions do middle managers exhibit transformational leadership behaviors?—An experience sampling method study on the predictors of transformational leadership behaviors. Leadership Quart. 22(2):344–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Hackman JR, Pearce JL (1976) Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. J. Appl. Psych. 61(4):395–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK (2007) ‘That is my job’: How employees’ role orientation affects their job performance. Human Relations 60(3):403–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK (2014) Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Rev. Psych. 65(1):661–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Wall TD, Jackson PR (1997) “That’s not my job”: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Acad. Management J. 40(4):899–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N (2006) Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. J. Appl. Psych. 91(3):636–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2000) The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Maynes TD, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM (2015) One (rating) from many (observations): Factors affecting the individual assessment of voice behavior in groups. J. Appl. Psych. 100(4):1189–1202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Morrison EW, Martinez TM (2018) The role of a good soldier: A review of research on organizational citizenship behavior role perceptions and recommendations for the future research. Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff NP, eds. Oxford Handbook of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Oxford University Press, New York), 91–104.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbaum F, Weisz JR, Snyder SS (1982) Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(1):5–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Wang G, Courtright SH (2011) Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 96(5):981–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Sinha R, Tangirala S, Awasty N (2018) Centralization of member voice in teams: Its effects on expertise utilization and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 103(8):813–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Venkataramani V, Gajendran RS (2019) Too busy to be fair? The effect of workload and rewards on managers’ justice rule adherence. Acad. Management J. 62(2):469–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Cole MS (2015) Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn’t it exploited more often? Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2(1):237–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, See KE, Miller CC, Lawless MW, Carton AM (2011) The paradox of stretch goals: Organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):544–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC (2005) Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and social network perspectives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):505–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector PE (1986) Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations 39(11):1005–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS (1994) The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(4):742–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangirala S, Ramanujam R (2008) Exploring nonlineartiy in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1189–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangirala S, Ramanujam R (2012) Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personality Psych. 65(2):251–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Management J. 41(1):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Quaquebeke N, Felps W (2018) Respectful inquiry: A motivational account of leading through asking open questions and listening. Acad. Management Rev. 43(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Tangirala S (2010) When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. J. Appl. Psych. 95(3):582–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Richter AW, Clarke R (2014) Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 99(5):966–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White RW (1959) Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psych. Rev. 66:297–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whiting SW, Maynes TD, Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM (2012) Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):159–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN (1999) Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1271–1288.Crossref, Google Scholar