Learning-by-Moving: Can Reconfiguring Spatial Proximity Between Organizational Members Promote Individual-level Exploration?

References

• Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Allen TJ, Fustfeld AR (1975) Research laboratory architecture and the structuring of communications. R & D Management 5(2):153–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alter A (2016) How to build a collaborative office space like Pixar and Google. Accessed July 1, 2016, http://99u.com/articles/16408/how-to-build-a-collaborative-office-space-like-pixar-and-google.Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3):321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P, Levine JM, Moreland RL (2000) Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker FD, Gield B, Gaylin K, Sayer S (1983) Office design in a community college: Effect on work and communication patterns. Environ. Behav. 15(6):699–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES, Turban S (2018) The impact of the ‘open’workspace on human collaboration. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 373(1753):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2017) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Link, Google Scholar
• Chown JD, Liu CC (2015) Geography and power in an organizational forum: Evidence from the U.S. Senate Chamber. Strategic Management J. 36(2):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coradi A, Heinzen M, Boutellier R (2015) A longitudinal study of workspace design for knowledge exploration and exploitation in the research and development process. Creativity Innovation Management 24(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crescenzi R, Nathan M, Rodríguez-Pose A (2016) Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Res. Policy 45(1):177–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Danneels E, Sethi R (2011) New product exploration under environmental turbulence. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1026–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Gutierrez C (2018) Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organ., ePub ahead of print October 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018803840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Bingham CB (2010) CROSSROADS-microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263–1273.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ (2005) Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organ. 3(4):441–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Back KW, Schachter S (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gieryn TF (2002) What buildings do. Theory Soc. 31(1):35–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godart F, Shipilov A, Claes K (2013) Making the most of the revolving door: The impact of outward personnel mobility networks on organizational creativity. Organ. Sci. 25(2):377–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Siemsen E, Vasudeva G (2015) Colocation still matters: Conformance quality and the interdependence of R&D and manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. 61(11):2760–2781.Link, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1995) Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. 38(3):673–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I (1972) Victims of Groupthink (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Junni P, Sarala RM, Taras V, Tarba SY (2013) Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):299–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabo FW, Cotton-Nessler N, Hwang Y, Levenstein MC, Owen-Smith J (2014) Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Res. Policy 43(9):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane AA (2010) Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ. Sci. 21(3):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khazanchi S, Sprinkle T, Masterson SS, Tong N (2018) A spatial model of work relationships: The relationship-buidling and relationship-straining effect of workspace design. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):590–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J-Y, Kim J-Y, Miner AS (2009) Organizational learning from extreme performance experience: The impact of success and recovery experience. Organ. Sci. 20(6):958–978.Link, Google Scholar
• Kolind L (2015) It works–I know it works. J. Organ. Design 4(2):16–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Nohria N, Eccles R, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 216–239.Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):833–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. 48(4):645–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Dover G (2015) Place and institutional work creating housing for the hard-to-house. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):371–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Puranam P (2017) Incentive redesign and collaboration in organizations: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2333–2352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Rittiner F, Szulanski G (2016) The past, present, and future of organizational learning research: A conversation with professor Linda Argote. J. Management Inquiry 25(1):85–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Walter J, Murnighan JK (2011) Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organ. Sci. 22(4):923–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu CC, Srivastava SB (2015) Pulling closer and moving apart: Interaction, identity, and influence in the U.S. Senate, 1973 to 2009. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):192–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClelland GH (1997) Optimal design in psychological research. Psych. Methods 2(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Soda G, Tortoriello M (2014) More formally: Rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):299–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mom TJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2007) Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J. Management Stud. 44(6):910–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mom TJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2009) Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):812–828.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Brass DJ (1979) Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):267–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2007) Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):563–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1983) Organizational demography. Cummings L, Staw B, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 5 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 299–357.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Håkonsson DD (2015) Valve’s way. J. Organ. Design 4(2):2–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4):835–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Kim T (2014) Great vessels take a long time to mature: Early success traps and competences in exploitation and exploration. Organ. Sci. 26(1):180–197.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rogan M, Mors ML (2014) A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1860–1877.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Steiner I (1972) Group Process and Productivity (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Stettner U, Lavie D (2014) Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1903–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (2003) Sticky Knowledge: Barriers to Knowing in the Firm. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Lee S (2018) Knowledge transfer: Barriers, methods, and timing of methods. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), ePub ahead of print January, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263362.013.41.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):941–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38(4):8–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White HC (2008) Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar