The Influence of Multinational Corporations on International Alliance Formation Behavior of Colocated Start-Ups

References

• Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Feldman MP (2004) Industrial clustering and the returns to inventive activity: Canadian biotechnology firms, 1991-2000. Working Paper 4 (03), Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Feldman MP (2007) Desperately seeking spillovers? Increasing returns, industrial organization and the location of new entrants in geographic and technological space. Indust. Corporate Change 16(1):89–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Plunket A (2008) Inventive and uninventive clusters: The case of Canadian biotechnology. Res. Policy 37(6–7):1108–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Feldman MP (2014) Industrial clustering and the innovative output. Rowe F, Te’eni D, eds. IT-Enabled R&D in an International Context (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 65–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharonson BS, Tzabbar D, Amburgey TL (2016) Do they know something we don’t? Endorsements from foreign MNCs and domestic network advantages for start-ups. Global Strategy J. 6(1):31–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aitken B, Hanson GH, Harrison AE (1997) Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior. J. Internat. Econom. 43(1):103–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Laham A, Souitaris V (2008) Network embeddedness and new-venture internationalization: Analyzing international linkages in the German biotech industry. J. Bus. Venturing 23(5):567–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Phene A (2004) Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):847–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2001) How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Acad. Management Perspectives 15(1):139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amburgey T (1986) Multivariate point processes in social research. Soc. Sci. Res. 15(2):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biotechnologie.de Report (2015) The German biotechnology sector 2015. Facts and figures. BIOCOM AG Yearbook (Andreas Mietzsch, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Biotechnologie.de Report (2016) The German biotechnology sector 2016. Facts and figures. BIOCOM AG Yearbook (Andreas Mietzsch, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Biotechnologie.de Report (2017) The German biotechnology sector 2017. Facts and figures. BIOCOM AG Yearbook (Andreas Mietzsch, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York)Google Scholar
• Bloodgood JM, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (1996) The internationalization of new high-potential U.S. ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 20(4):61–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blossfeld HP, Golsch K, Rohwer G (2007) Event History Analysis with Stata (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Boeh KK, Beamish PW (2012) Travel time and the liability of distance in foreign direct investment: Location choice and entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(5):525–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Working paper, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
• Casper S, Lehrer M, Soskice D (1999) Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Indust. Innovation 6(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty S, Holm DB (2000) Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: A network approach. Internat. Bus. Rev. 9(1):77–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J (1998) Trust and international strategic alliances: The case of Sino-foreign joint venture. Lane C, Bachmann R, eds. Trust within and between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 241–272.Google Scholar
• Child J (2001) Trust—The fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organ. Dynamics 29(4):274–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1995) Growing the entrepreneurial firm. Networking for international market development. Eur. J. Marketing 29(7):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1997) Network relationships and the internationalization process of small software firms. Internat. Bus. Rev. 6(4):361–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramer T (2015) Building the “world’s pharmacy”: The rise of the German pharmaceutical industry, 1871–1914. Bus. History Rev. 89(1):43–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Rajagopalan N (2012) Are all ‘sharks’ dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1115–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohse D (2000) Technology policy and the regions—The case of the BioRegio contest. Res. Policy 29(9):1111–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohse D, Staehler T (2008) BioRegio, BioProfile and the rise of the German biotech industry. Report 1456, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
• Doz YL (1987) Technology partnerships between larger and smaller firms: Some critical issues. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 17(4):31–57.Google Scholar
• Ellis PD (2011) Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(1):99–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young (2015) Biotechnology Industry Report 2015: Beyond borders: Reaching new heights. Accessed September 16, 2019, https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssetsPI/EY-beyond-borders-2015/$FILE/EY-beyond-borders-2015.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young (2016) Biotechnology Industry Report 2016: Beyond borders: Returning to Earth. Accessed September 16, 2019, https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-beyond-borders-2016/$FILE/EY-beyond-borders-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ferner A (1997) Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resources Management J. 7(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernhaber SA, Li D (2010) The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 34(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernhaber SA, Gilbert BA, McDougall PP (2008) International entrepreneurship and geographic location: An empirical examination of new venture internationalization. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(2):267–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernhaber SA, McDougall-Covin P, Shepherd D (2009) International entrepreneurship: Leveraging internal and external knowledge sources. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 3(4):297–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornahl D, Broekel T, Boschma R (2011) What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers Regional Sci. 90(2):395–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Manz CC (1985) Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):527–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harzing A-W, Sorge A (2003) The relative impact of country of origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporate control in multinational enterprises: Worldwide and European perspectives. Organ. Stud. 24(2):187–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmlund M, Kock S (1998) Relationships and the internationalization of Finnish small and medium-sized companies. Internat. Small Bus. J. 16(4):46–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC (1998) Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. Acad. Management Executive 12(4):69–80.Google Scholar
• Johanson J, Vahlne JE (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(9):1411–1431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser R, Prange H (2004) The reconfiguration of national innovation systems: The example of German biotechnology. Res. Policy 33(3):395–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwok CC, Tadesse S (2006) The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(6):767–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon SW, Haleblian J, Hagedoorn J (2016) In country we trust? National trust and the governance of international R&D alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47(7):807–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane HW, Beamish PW (1990) Cross-cultural cooperative behavior in joint ventures in LDCs. Management Internat. 30:87–102.Google Scholar
• Laufs K, Schwens C (2014) Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. Internat. Bus. Rev. 23(6):1109–1126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4):623–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Leiblein M, Reuer J (2004) Building a foreign sales base: The roles of capabilities and alliances for entrepreneurial firms. J. Bus. Venturing 19(2):285–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. 7(4):428–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Manz CC, Sims HP Jr (1981) Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1):105–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mariotti S, Mutinelli M, Nicolini M, Piscitello L (2015) Productivity spillovers from foreign multinational enterprises to domestic manufacturing firms: To what extent does spatial proximity matter? Regional Stud. 49(10):1639–1653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meschi PX (1997) Longevity and cultural differences of international joint ventures: Toward time-based cultural management. Human Relations 50(2):211–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezias JM (2002) How to identify liabilities of foreignness and assess their effects on multinational corporations. J. Internat. Management 8(3):265–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milanov H, Fernhaber SA (2009) The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new venture networks. J. Bus. Venturing 24(1):46–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milanov H, Fernhaber SA (2014) When do domestic alliances help ventures abroad? Direct and moderating effects from a learning perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 29(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narula R, Hagedoorn J (1999) Innovating through strategic alliances: Moving toward international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation 19(5):283–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noorderhaven NG, Harzing A-W (2003) The “country-of-origin effect” in multinational corporations: Sources, mechanisms and moderating conditions. Management Internat. Rev. 43(2):47–66.Google Scholar
• Oehme M, Bort S (2015) SME internationalization modes in the German biotechnology industry: The influence of imitation, network position and international experience. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(6):629–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Riccaboni M, Pammolli F, Powell W (2002) A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Sci. 48(1):24–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1991) Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 22(4):579–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A, Tallman S (2012) Complexity, context and governance in biotechnology alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(1):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prashantham S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Dancing with gorillas: How small companies can partner effectively with MNCs. California Management Rev. 51(1):6–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prashantham S, Dhanaraj C (2015) MNE ties and new venture internationalization: Exploratory insights from India. Asia Pacific J. Management 32(4):901–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2006) Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 21(4):429–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Goerzen A (2010) Alliance management capability: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. J. Management 36(5):1192–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan W (1990) An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms. Strategic Management J. 11(2):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B (1994) Interfirm cooperation and start-up innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. 15(5):387–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma DD, Blomstermo A (2003) The internationalization process of Born Globals: A network view. Internat. Bus. Rev. 12(6):739–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh K, Mitchell W (2005) Growth dynamics: The bidirectional relationship between interfirm collaboration and business sales in entrant and incumbent alliances. Strategic Management J. 26(6):497–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• StataCorp (2017) Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. StataCorp, LLCollege Station, TX.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Blackwell, Basil, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Vandaie R, Zaheer A (2014) Surviving bear hugs: Firm capability, large partner alliances, and growth. Strategic Management J. 35(4):566–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vapola TJ (2011) The laws of attraction: What attracts innovative start-up firms to partnerships with global MNCs? J. Internat. Entrepreneurship 9(1):39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. Quart. J. Econom. 80(2):190–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Clegg J, Kafouros M (2009) Country-of-origin effects of foreign direct investment. Management Internat. Rev. 49(2):179–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O'Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
• Yang H, Zheng Y, Zaho X (2014) Exploration and exploitation? Small firms’ alliance strategies with large firms. Strategic Management J. 35(1):146–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeniyurt S, Townsend JD, Cavusgil TS, Ghauri PN (2009) Mimetic and experiential effects in international marketing alliance formations of US pharmaceuticals firms: An event history analysis. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(2):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ (2001) Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management J. 22(6-7):587–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu J, Gilbert BA, Oviatt BM (2011) Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management J. 32(4):424–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad. Management J. 43(5):925–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Ucbasaran D, Newey LR (2009) Social knowledge and SME’s innovative gains from internationalization. Eur. Management Rev. 6(2):81–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Res. Organ. Behavior 8:53–111.Google Scholar