Institutional Logics and Technology Development: Evidence from the Wind and Solar Energy Industries

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D (2002) Directed technical change. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(4):781–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• American Wind Energy Association (2002) The U.S. small wind turbine industry roadmap: A twenty-year industry plan for small wind turbine technology. Report, American Wind Energy Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• American Wind Energy Association (2012) AWEA U.S. wind industry annual market report. Report, American Wind Energy Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Henderson JV, Thisse J-F, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2713–2739.Google Scholar
• Baglati BH (2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Bahro R (1986) Building the Green Movement (GMP, London).Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley RL Jr (2011) Girlie man energy. Institute for Energy Research. Accessed September 7, 2013, http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2011/03/02/girlie-man-energy/#.Google Scholar
• Buss TF (2001) The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Econom. Development Quart. 15(1):90–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colyvas JA, Jonsson S (2011) Ubiquity and legitimacy: Disentangling diffusion and institutionalization. Sociol. Theory 29(1):27–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook J (1985) Nuclear follies. Forbes 135(3):82–100.Google Scholar
• Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE) (2012) Summary tables. Accessed October 18, 2012, http://www.dsireusa.org/system/program/maps.Google Scholar
• De Laquil P, Kearney D, Geyer M, Diver R (1993) Solar-thermal electric technology. Johansson TB, Kelly H, Reddy AKN, Williams RH, eds. Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity (Island Press, Washington, DC), 213–296.Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Russo MV, Montes-Sancho M (2007) Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management J. 28(2):189–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodge DM (2001) Illustrated history of wind power development. (Electronic version.) Accessed June 28, 2014, http://www.telosnet.com/wind/index.html.Google Scholar
• Elazar DJ (1972) American Federalism: A View from the States (Thomas Y. Crowell Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration (2000) Energy consumption and renewable energy development potential on Indian lands. Report SR/CNEAF/2000-01, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Fasulo P, Walker P (2007) Careers in the Environment, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill Professional, New York).Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 84(2):210–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Florida RL (2008) Who’s Your City? How the Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Friedrich K (2015) Which solar investment tax credit can survive the federal political environment? Clean Energy Finance Forum (June 17), http://cleanenergyfinanceforum.com/2015/06/17/which-solar-investment-tax-credit-strategy-can-survive-the-federal-political-climate/.Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Burt RS (1991) Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(1):88–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith K (2010) California: Jerry Brown kicked off clean energy revolution once, aims to do it again. Grist (June 24) http://grist.org/article/2010-06-24-jerry-brown-clean-energy-revolution-in-california-once-and-again/.Google Scholar
• Gipe P (1995) Wind Energy Comes of Age (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Gittelman M (2007) Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organ. Sci. 18(4):724–741.Link, Google Scholar
• Global Insight (2009) United States historical population data. Accessed April 12, 2012, http://www.ihs.com/products/global-insight/country-analysis.Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Grandy JB, Lee BH (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and US oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Institute for Educational Leadership (2005) Engaging and partnering with faith-based organizations in initiatives for children, youth, and families. Report, Institute for Educational Leadership, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Interstate Renewable Energy Council (1997) Survey of renewable energy incentives. Report, Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Latham, NY.Google Scholar
• Interstate Renewable Energy Council (2012) 2012 annual updates & trends report. Report, Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Latham, NY.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson TB, Kelly H, Reddy AKN, Williams RH (1993) Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity (Island Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Johnson SB (1979) State approaches to solar legislation: A survey. Solar Law Reporter 1(1):55–137.Google Scholar
• Kelly H (1993) Introduction to photovoltaic technology. Johansson TB, Kelly H, Reddy AKN, Williams RH, eds. Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity (Island Press, Washington, DC), 297–336.Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2009) Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Acad. Management J. 52(5):897–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenney M (2000) Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):638–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• League of Conservation Voters (1985) How Congress voted on energy and the environment. Report, League of Conservation Voters, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Lee MP, Lounsbury M (2015) Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organ. Sci. 26(3):847–866.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee B, Sine WD (2005) Constructing entrepreneurial opportunity: Environmental movements and the transformation of regional regulatory regimes. Frenken K, ed. Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 93–120.Google Scholar
• Lee B, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu C-SJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econometrics 108(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2002) Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Acad. Management J. 45(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovins AB (1976) Energy strategy: The road not taken? Foreign Affairs 55(1):69–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway).Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Battilana J (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskell P (2001) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Indust. Corporate Change 10(4):921–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maurer CC, Bansal P, Crossan MM (2011) Creating economic value through social values: Introducing a culturally informed resource-based view. Organ. Sci. 22(2):432–448.Link, Google Scholar
• McGowan JG, Connors SR (2000) Windpower: A turn of the century review. Annual Rev. Energy Environ. 25(1):147–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McVeigh J, Burtraw D, Darmstadter J, Palmer K (2000) Winner, loser or innocent victim: Has renewable energy performed as expected? Solar Energy 68(3):237–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer DS (2003) Political opportunity and nested institutions. Soc. Movement Stud. 2(1):17–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Weaver GR, Elms H (2008) Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):750–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody’s (1976) Moody’s Public Utility Manual (Moody’s Investors Service, New York).Google Scholar
• Mueller J, Ronen A (2015) Softer solar landings: Options avoid the investment tax credit cliff. GW Solar Institute Report GWSI PB15-01, GW Solar Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures (1982) Summary of state financial incentives for renewable energy. Report, National Conference of State Legislatures, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Laboratories (2009) NREL overview, July 29. Accessed September 17, 2009, http://www.nrel.gov/overview.Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2013) Survey of research and development at universities and colleges. Integrated Science and Engineering Resources Data System (WebCASPAR). Accessed May 5, 2013, https://webcaspar.nsf.gov.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1977) In search of useful theory of innovation. Res. Policy 6(1):36–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Res. Policy 32(6):1081–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, Dean TJ (2015) Firm responses to social movement pressures: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1093–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, York JG, Hargrave TJ (2014) The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1609–1632.Link, Google Scholar
• Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4):859–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pechman C (1993) Regulating Power: The Economics of Electricity in the Information Age (Kluwer, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(2):194–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(2):73–95.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(6):77–90.Google Scholar
• Roberts EB (2007) Managing invention and innovation. Res. Tech. Management 50(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1996) Uncertainty and technological change. Landau R, Taylor R, Wright G, eds. The Mosaic of Economic Growth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 334–355.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1997) Improvement upon improvement: Long after innovation. Rosenberg N, ed. Studies on Science and the Innovation Process: Selected Works by Nathan Rosenberg (World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ), 153–172.Google Scholar
• Russo MV (2001) Institutions, exchange relations, and the emergence of new fields: Regulatory policies and independent power production in America, 1978–1992. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):57–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MV (2010) Companies on a Mission: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Growing Sustainably, Responsibly, and Profitably (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Esmundo M (2009) Technology S-curves in renewable energy alternatives: Analysis and implications for industry and government. Res. Policy 37(5):1767–1781.Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M (2002) Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: Politics, social movements, and mutual companies in American fire insurance. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 19 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 39–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, Lounsbury M (2017) Social movements and the dynamics of institutions and organizations. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence T, Meyer R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage, London), 281–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Seo M, Creed WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):222–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee B (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solar Rating & Certification Corporation (1985) State Solar Directory (Solar Rating & Certification Corporation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Song M, Montoya-Weiss MM (2001) The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Acad. Management J. 44(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterzinger G, Svrcek M (2004) Wind turbine development: Location of manufacturing activity. Technical report, Renewable Energy Policy Project, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Sterzinger G, Svrcek M (2005) Solar PV development: Location of economic activity. Technical report, Renewable Energy Policy Project, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res. Policy 32(2):229–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terlaak A, Gong Y (2009) Analogical learning and technology adoption: The thin film photovoltaic cell industry. Unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
• Terry JC, Yandle B (1997) EPA’s toxic release inventory: Stimulus and response. Management Decision Econom. 18(6):433–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 45(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Kim T (2013) Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1214–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2013) Gross domestic product by state. Accessed July 22, 2013, http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=1&isuri=1&acrdn=1#reqid=70&step=1&isuri=1.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (1982) Preliminary estimates of the intercensal population of counties. Accessed August 12, 2013, https://www.census.gov/content/census/en/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/pre-1980-county.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. Photovoltaic Industry Roadmap Steering Committee (2003) Solar electric power: The U.S. photovoltaic industry roadmap. Report, U.S. Photovoltaics Industry, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson JQ (1980) The Politics of Regulation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Woodward J (1958) Management and Technology (H.M. Stationery Off., London).Google Scholar
• York JG, Hargrave TJ, Pacheco DF (2016) Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Acad. Management J. 59(2):579–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, Vedula S, Lenox M (2018) It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1492–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar