Exploring Uncharted Territory: Knowledge Search Processes in the Origination of Outlier Innovation

References

• Adner R, Levinthal DA (2008) Doing vs. seeing: Acts of exploitation and perceptions of exploration. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(1):43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Feldman MP (2007) Desperately seeking spillovers? Increasing returns, industrial organization and the location of new entrants in geographic and technological space. Indust. Corporate Change 16(1):89–130.Google Scholar
• Aharonson B, Schilling MA (2015) Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution. Res. Policy 45(1):81–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2004) Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):887–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Gittelman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Gittelman M, Sampat B (2008) Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. Patents: An overview and analysis. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2015) Killing the golden goose? The decline of science in corporate R&D. NBER Working Paper No. w20902, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Austen I (2000) Silk and money. Canadian Bus. 73(12):42–45.Google Scholar
• Barirani A, Beaudry C, Agard B (2015) Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in Canada. Technovation 36–37(February–March):39–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Bikard M 2017. Creativity “in the air”: Simultaneous discoveries in science and their implications. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Brooks H (1994) The relationship between science and technology. Res. Policy 23(5):477–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1998) Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (HBS Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coover HW (1983) Cyanoacrylate adhesives—A day of serendipity, a decade of hard work. J. Coatings Tech. 55:59–61.Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal D (2016) Mental representations and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Siggelkow N (2010) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):593–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahlin K, Taylor M, Fichman M (2004) Today’s Edisons or weekend hobbyists: Technical merit and success of inventions by independent inventors. Res. Policy 33(8):1167–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature 26(3):1120–1171.Google Scholar
• Ellis HC (1965) The Transfer of Learning (Macmillan, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Fahlman SE (1989) Representing implicit knowledge. Hinton GE, Anderson JA, eds. Parallel Models of Associative Memory (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 171–190.Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):621–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2007) Breakthroughs and the “long tail” of innovation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(1):69–74.Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Management Sci. 45(1):934–950.Google Scholar
• Gestwicki JE (2018) Information on training provided via personal communication with authors, September 22 and 23.Google Scholar
• Gosline JM, Guerette PA, Ortlepp CS, Savage KN (1999) The mechanical design of spider silks: From fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Experiment. Biol. 202(part 23):3295–3303.Google Scholar
• Gruber M, Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2013) Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Management Sci. 59(4):837–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall BH (2008) The patent-name matching project. Accessed October 29, 2019, https://eml.berkeley.edu/~bhhall/patents.html.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. w8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hargadon A (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: Technology Brokering and the Pursuit of Innovation (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40(12):1720–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Iddan GJ, Swain CP (2004) History and development of capsule endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics North Amer. 14(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Tan J, Thursby M (2010) Incumbent firm invention in emerging fields: Evidence from the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 32(1):55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S (1993) The Origins of Order (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S, Lobo J, Macready WG (2000) Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(2):141–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keijl S, Gilsing VA, Knoben J, Duysters G (2016) The two faces of inventions: The relationship between recombination and impact in pharmaceutical biotechnology. Res. Policy 45(5):1061–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koestler A (1973) The Act of Creation (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Levinthal D (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Amy ZY, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Google Scholar
• Liebskind LS (2017) Information on discovery path provided via personal communication with authors, November 2.Google Scholar
• Luchins AS (1942) Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of einstellung. Psych. Monographs 54(6):i–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karatzas C (2017) Detailed information on discovery path provided via personal communication with authors, November 16.Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Martindale C (1995) Creativity and connectionism. Smith SM, Ward TB, Finke RA, eds. The Creative Cognition Approach (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 249–268.Google Scholar
• Marx M (2019) Patent citations to science. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2019) Reliance on science in patenting. Working paper, Boston University Questrom School of Business, Boston.Google Scholar
• Mayer RE (1995) The search for insight: Grappling with Gestalt psychology's unanswered questions. Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, eds. The Nature of Insight (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Mayer RE, Greeno JG (1972) Structural differences between outcomes produced by different instructional methods. J. Ed. Psych. 63(2):165–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melero E, Palomeras N (2015) The Renaissance Man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Res. Policy 44(1):154–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. Outlier. Accessed October 29, 2019, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/outlier.Google Scholar
• Merton RK, Barber E (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L (2003) Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. Peterson RS, Mannix EA, eds. Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 135–162.Google Scholar
• Murto J (2019) Information on invention process provided via personal communication with authors, April 2.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(1):114–132.Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. 13(5):547–566.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2016) Lead and Disrupt: How to Solve the Innovators Dilemma (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Pitner B (2017) Information on discovery process provided via personal communication with authors, September 29.Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):745–873.Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rulke D, Galaskiewicz J (2000) Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Sci. 46(5):612–625.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2005) A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Res. J. 17(2–3):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Fang C (2016) When hubs forget, lie, and play favorites: Interpersonal network structure, information distortion, and organizational learning. Strategic Management J. 35(7):974–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Green E (2011) Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences. Res. Policy 40(10):1321–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soini J (2017) History of research agenda provided via personal communication with authors, September 21.Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (1999) Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psych. Inquiry 10(4):309–328.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Stamler JB (2018) Information on discovery path provided via personal communication with authors, October 4.Google Scholar
• Steyvers M, Tenenbaum JB (2002) The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Stroebe W, Nijstad BA, Rietzschel EF. 2010. Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: the evolution of a question. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43:157–203.Google Scholar
• Supattapone S (2019) Information on experimentation process provided via personal communication with authors, April 2.Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc. VI Internat. Congress Genetics, 356–366.Google Scholar