Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations?
References
- (1999) Legal and social safeguards against opportunism in exchange. J. Retailing 75(1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) IBM forges global joint venture with Maersk applying blockchain to ‘digitize’ global trade. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2018/01/16/ibm-forges-global-joint-venture-with-maersk-applying-blockchain-to-digitize-global-trade/#b232864547e8.Google Scholar
- (2018) IBM’s food blockchain is going live with a supermarket giant on board. Accessed February 6, 2020, https://www.coindesk.com/ibm-food-supply-chain-blockchain-carrefour-live-production.Google Scholar
- (2007) Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1060–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchain’s struggle to deliver impersonal exchange. Minnesota J. Law Sci. Tech. 19(1):55–105.Google Scholar
- (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Information technology, incentives, and the optimal number of suppliers. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Tacitness, codification of technological knowledge and the organisation of industry. Res. Policy 31(3):357–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 15(8):175–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):704–723.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Tacit Knowledge in Organizations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
- (2017) The blockchain does not eliminate the need for trust. Accessed March 25, 2020, http://theconversation.com/the-blockchain-does-not-eliminate-the-need-for-trust-86481.Google Scholar
- (2018) Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(10):1020–1034.Google Scholar
- (2009) The organization of regional clusters. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):623–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How the blockchain is redefining trust. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.wired.com/story/how-the-blockchain-is-redefining-trust.Google Scholar
- (2016) On distributed database and distributed ledgers. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://gendal.me/2016/11/08/on-distributed-databases-and-distributed-ledgers/.Google Scholar
- (2015) Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. J. Oper. Management 33–34(January):15–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A meta-analysis of the exchange hazards–interfirm governance relationship: An informal institutions perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 49(3):303–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How blockchain applications will move beyond finance. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 2), https://hbr.org/2017/03/how-blockchain-applications-will-move-beyond-finance.Google Scholar
- (2019) Blockchain technology and organization science: Decentralization theatre or novel organizational form? Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- (2020) Some simple economics of the blockchain. Commun. ACM Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
- CBInsights (2020) Investment to blockchain startups slips in 2019. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.cbinsights.com/research/blockchain-investment-trends-2019/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Understanding the multiple functions of construction contracts: The anatomy of FIDIC model contracts. Construction Management Econom. 36(8):472–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):9–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management 24(4):469–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Introduction—Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):381–400.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) From Bitcoin to cybersecurity: A comparative study of blockchain application and security issues. Fei X, Wang L, Ji C, Chen N, Sun Q, Song X, Wang X, eds. Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Systems Informatics 2017 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, MA), 975–979.Google Scholar
- (1998) Contours of diffusion of electronic data interchange in Finland: Overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 7(4):275–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econom. 16(1):67–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process. J. Management 24(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. J. Inst. Econom. 14(4):639–658.Google Scholar
- (2017) On the genesis of interfirm relational contracts. Strategy Sci. 2(4):234–245.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Rules, practices, and information technology: A trifecta of organizational regulation. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):755–773.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) United Nations sends aid to 10,000 Syrian refugees using Ethereum blockchain. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.coindesk.com/united-nations-sends-aid-to-10000-syrian-refugees-using-ethereum-blockchain.Google Scholar
- (2013) Information technology and business-level strategy: Toward an integrated theoretical perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):483–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Theory Development (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2011) The economics of credence goods: An experiment on the role of liability, verifiability, reputation, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):526–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchain is changing how media and entertainment companies compete. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 60(1):39–45.Google Scholar
- (1997) Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management J. 18(7):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1053–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) What problems will you solve with blockchain? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 60(1):32–38.Google Scholar
- (2018) EDI with blockchain as an enabler for extreme automation. IT Professional 20(4):66–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Disrupting industries with blockchain: The industry, venture capital funding, and regional distribution of blockchain ventures. Bui TX, ed. Proc. 51st Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 3517–3526.Google Scholar
- (2018) GSA expands blockchain procurement pilot. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://gcn.com/articles/2018/11/15/gsa-blockchain-mas.aspx.Google Scholar
- (2016) Contract Formation: Law and Practice , 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
- (2014) Identity orientation, social exchange, and information technology use in interorganizational collaborations. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1372–1390.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(3):849–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):13–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Formal and informal contracting: Theory and evidence. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:141–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Crowd-open and crowd-based collaborations: Facilitating the emergence of organization design. Res. Sociol. Organ. 64:271–292.Google Scholar
- (2017) Three (non-pointless) permissioned blockchains in production. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.multichain.com/blog/2017/11/three-non-pointless-blockchains-production/.Google Scholar
- (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(2):265–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):531–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) How to time-stamp a digital document. J. Cryptology 3(2):99–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Central bank-issued cryptocurrency round up: IMF, BoE, Hong Kong. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://news.bitcoin.com/central-bank-issued-cryptocurrency-round-up-imf-boe-hong-kong/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchain revolution without the blockchain. Commun. ACM 61(7):27–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Relational contracts and the value of relationships. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):750–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. J. Marketing 58(1):71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing 56(2):32–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Toward reconciling transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based view of the firm: The context of interfirm collaborations. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 9(1):97–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 9(4):361–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. J. Oper. Management 25(2):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The rise of decentralized autonomous organizations: new forms of task coordination and the growth of cryptocurrency. Working paper, Imperial College London, London.Google Scholar
- (2018) Bitcoin and the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations. J. Organ. Design 7(1):14.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A process model of complementarity and substitution of contractual and relational governance in IS outsourcing. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(3):81–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The truth about blockchain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(1):118–127.Google Scholar
- IBM (2017) IBM Global Financing uses blockchain technology to quickly resolve financial disputes. Accessed November 5, 2019, https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/in-en/infographic/finance.html.Google Scholar
- IBM (2018a) AIG, IBM, Standard Chartered deliver first multinational insurance policy powered by blockchain. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52607.wss.Google Scholar
- IBM (2018b) TradeLens, a Maersk and IBM solution, delivers a blockchain-enabled visibility and document management solution for container shipping that promotes more efficient and secure global trade. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?htmlfid=872/ENUSAP18-0503&infotype=AN&subtype=CA.Google Scholar
- (2017) A perspective on blockchain smart contracts: Reducing uncertainty and complexity in value exchange. Poellabauer C, Abdelzaher T, Shen H, eds. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Computer Communication Networks 2017 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, MA), 1–6.Google Scholar
- (2005) Trust, contract and relationship development. Organ. Stud. 26(6):813–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Integrating long-and short-term contracting via business-to-business exchanges for capital-intensive industries. Management Sci. 49(11):1597–1615.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):76–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Codifiability, relationship-specific IT investment, and optimal contracting. Dennis E, ed. Proc. 36th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. 2003 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, MA), 1–10.Google Scholar
- (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management J. 31(4):349–370.Google Scholar
- (2018) The morning download: Walmart makes blockchain a requirement for veggie suppliers. Wall Street Journal (September 25), https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2018/09/25/the-morning-download-walmart-makes-blockchain-a-requirement-for-veggie-suppliers/?guid=BL-CIOB-14457&mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=6&dsk=y.Google Scholar
- (2004) The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. J. Management 30(4):471–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How contracts influence trust and distrust. J. Management 43(5):1553–1577.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes inter-firm dispute resolution. Strategic Management J. 32(5):532–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Reinvigorating the study of opportunism in supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 56(1):73–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Opportunism in inter-firm exchanges in emerging markets. Management Organ. Rev. 2(1):121–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The role of intermediating institutions in the diffusion of electronic data interchange (EDI): How industry associations intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong. Inform. Soc. 17(3):195–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Inter-organizational information systems adoption–A configuration analysis approach. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 20(5):496–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The role of information in licensing contract design. Res. Policy 25(1):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 72(6):854–902.Google Scholar
- (1980) The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
- (2018) Catalyst organizations as a new organization design for innovation: The case of hyperloop transportation technologies. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(4):472–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: The effects of contract structure. Acad. Management J. 54(5):981–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun. ACM 30(6):484–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Hyperloop will run on blockchain instead of rails: Tokenization of the ticketing system. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://irishtechnews.ie/hyperloop-will-run-on-blockchain-instead-of-rails-tokenization-of-the-ticketing-system/.Google Scholar
- (2018) 30+ real examples of blockchain technology in practice. Forbes (May 14), https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/14/30-real-examples-of-blockchain-technology-in-practice/#32451682740d.Google Scholar
- (1993) Transaction costs, mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Management Decision Econom. 14(2):119–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) The costs of organization. J. Econom. Organ. 7(1):1–25.Google Scholar
- (2004) Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15(4):394–410.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1):91–103.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Enforcement procedures and governance structures: What relationship? Ménard C, ed. Institutions, Contracts, and Organizations (Edward Elgar Publishing, MA), 234–253.Google Scholar
- (2008) Untangling safeguard and production coordination effects in long-term buyer-supplier relationships. Acad. Management J. 51(4):785–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. J. Econom. Perspect. 9(4):3–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Contracting in the smart era: The implications of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations for contracting and corporate governance. Acad. Management Perspect. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2017) Bitcoin’s academic pedigree. Commun. ACM 60(12):36–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchain, AI and robotics: How future tech will simplify federal procurement. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.federaltimes.com/acquisition/2018/03/23/blockchain-ai-and-robotics-how-future-tech-will-simplify-federal-procurement/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Learning to trust: From relational exchange to generalized trust in China. Organ. Sci. 29(5):969–986.Link, Google Scholar
- (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Toward a dynamic theory of transactions. J. Evolutionary Econom. 2(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) What the blockchain revolution means for CMOs. Forbes (March 12), https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveolenski/2018/03/12/what-the-blockchain-revolution-means-for-cmos/#713754b96f5d.Google Scholar
- (2017) How coordination trajectories influence the performance of interorganizational project networks. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1029–1060.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2:433–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law Econom. Organ. 13(2):387–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(3):283–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. J. Management 37(4):1108–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1958) Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post Critical Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2016) Textbook on Contract Law (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The people leading the blockchain revolution. New York Times (June 27), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27/business/dealbook/blockchain-stars.html.Google Scholar
- (2018) Trust and contracts: Complements vs. substitutes in business-to-business exchanges. Searle RH, Nienaber AMI, Sitkin SB, eds. The Routledge Companion to Trust (Routledge, London), 228–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008a) Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organ. Sci. 19(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008b) Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: Specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long‐standing ties. J. Management Stud. 45(7):1195–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Res. Policy 30(9):1373–1394.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):88–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Reputation systems. Commun. ACM 43(12):45–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management J. 28(3):313–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Cooperative Strategies: Alliance Governance (Edward Elgar, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. 13(7):483–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: A transaction cost perspective. Internat. J. Production Res. 58(7):2124–2141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Cooperation across disciplines: A multilevel perspective on cooperative behavior in governing interfirm relations. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):960–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The many futures of contracts: Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Management 40(1):193–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strategic Organ. 11(3):281–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management J. 36(2):276–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The double-edged effect of contracts on alliance performance. J. Management 44(7):2827–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The Crypto Encyclopedia: Coins, Tokens, and Digital Assets from A to Z (Growth Publisher, Bern).Google Scholar
- (2016) Understanding the DAO attack. Accessed March 25, 2020, https://www.coindesk.com/understanding-dao-hack-journalists/.Google Scholar
- (2002) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. 48(7):900–916.Link, Google Scholar
- (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
- (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strateg. Manage. J. 20(7):595–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) 94% of Fortune 500 execs have blockchain project plans — do you? Accessed March 25, 2020, https://medium.com/@kingsland/94-of-fortune-500-execs-have-blockchain-project-plans-do-you-d53278ffb8d4.Google Scholar
- (2006) Supplier performance in vertical alliances: The effects of self-enforcing agreements and enforceable contracts. Organ. Sci. 17(4):436–452.Link, Google Scholar
- (1980) A theory of self-enforcing agreements. J. Bus. 53(1):27–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
- U.S. General Service Administration (2018) 2018 agency financial report: Service, accountability, innovation. Report, U.S General Service Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2003) The rational choice approach to an analysis of intra-and interorganizational governance. Buskens V, Raub W, Snijders C, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald, Bingley), 21–46.Google Scholar
- Wall Street Journal (2018) Blockchain has power to transform (March 12), B4.Google Scholar
- Wikipedia (2020) Enforcement. Accessed Mar 25, 2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enforcement#cite_ref-1.Google Scholar
- (2018) The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) The markets and hierarchies and visible hand perspectives. Van de Van AH, Joyce WF, eds. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior (Wiley, New York), 347–370.Google Scholar
- (2010) Strategic development of business models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the Internet. Long Range Planning 43(2–3):272–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Are blockchains immune to all malicious attacks? Financial Innovation 2(1):25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Pautasso C, Rimba P (2017) A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design. O’Conner L, ed. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Software Architecture, 2017 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, MA), 243–252.Google Scholar
- (2017) Corporate governance and blockchains. Rev. Finance 21(1):7–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organ. Sci. 17(2):215–229.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: The case of South Korea. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 14(3):323–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Organizing innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1389–1408.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: Model, techniques, and applications. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics Systems 48(9):1421–1428.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Manufacturer governance of foreign distributor relationships: Do relational norms enhance competitiveness in the export market? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(6):550–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(5):861–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(7):677–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future and Power of Work (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar

