Institutional Change and Early-Stage Start-Up Selection: Evidence from Applicants to Venture Accelerators

References

• Ardagna S, Lusardi A (2010) Explaining international differences in entrepreneurship: The role of individual characteristics and regulatory constraints. Lerner J, Schoar A, eds. International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 17–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Assenova, VA (2020) Early-stage venture incubation and mentoring promote learning, scaling, and profitability among disadvantaged entrepreneurs. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1560–1578.Link, Google Scholar
• Assenova VA, Sorenson O (2017) Legitimacy and the benefits of firm formalization. Organ. Sci. 28(5):804–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Certo ST (2003) Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):432–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S (2013) What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations 8(3–4):19–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2018) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Fehder DC, Hochberg YV, Murray F (2019) The design of startup accelerators. Res. Policy. 48(7):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Hochberg YV (2014) Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon. Preprint, submitted March 30, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2418000.Google Scholar
• DaSilva CM, Gurtner P (2017). Accelerators: An assessment of acceleration models. Proc. Acad. Management Annual Meeting (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY).Google Scholar
• Davidsson P (2015) Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. J. Bus. Venturing 30(5):674–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidsson P, Recker J, von Briel F (2018) External enablement of new venture creation: A framework. Acad. Management Perspect.Google Scholar
• de Mel S, McKenzie DJ, Woodruff CM (2010) Who are the microenterprise owners? Evidence from Sri Lanka on Tokman v. De Soto. Lerner J, Schoar A, eds. International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) The regulation of entry. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Dowd TJ (2000) The market that antitrust built: Public policy, private coercion, and railroad acquisitions, 1825 to 1922. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(5):631–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Hawn O, Vidal E, Chatterji A, McGahan A, Mitchell W (2016) How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Acad. Management J. 59(3):818–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart R, Eesley CE, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk and new firm growth. Organ. Sci. 28(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE (2016) Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1290–1306.Link, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Li JB, Yang D (2016) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehder DC (2015) Startup accelerators and ecosystems: Complements or substitutes? Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Fehder DC, Hochberg YV (2014) Accelerators and the regional supply of venture capital investment. Preprint, submitted September 19, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2518668.Google Scholar
• Ganamotse GN, Samuelsson M, Abankwah M, Anthony RT, Mphela T (2017) The emerging properties of business accelerators: The case of Botswana, Namibia and Uganda global business labs. J. Entrepreneurship Innovation Emerging Econom. 3(1):16–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Bingham CB, Cohen S (2014) Do accelerators accelerate? A study of venture accelerators as a path to success? Proc. Acad. Management Annual Meeting (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 12955–12955.Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD (2014) Clear and present danger: Planning and new venture survival amid political and civil violence. Strategic Management J. 35(5):773–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochberg YV (2016) Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy Econom. 16(1):25–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapper L, Amit R, Guillén MF (2010) Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Lerner J, Schoar A, eds. International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 129–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapper L, Laeven L, Rajan R (2006) Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 82(3):591–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Schoar A (2010) Introduction. Lerner J, Schoar A, eds. International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang Y, Chan TS (2005) Entrepreneurial strategy making and performance in China’s new technology ventures—The contingency effect of environments and firm competences. J. High Tech. Management Res. 16(1):37–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, Mialon HM, Williams MA (2004) What is a barrier to entry? Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):461–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mora R, Reggio I (2013) Treatment effect identification using alternative parallel assumptions. Working paper, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid.Google Scholar
• Mora R, Reggio I (2015) didq: A command for treatment-effect estimation under alternative assumptions. Stata J. 15(3):281132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutional change. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 72–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels C, Clarysse B, Wright M, Van Hove J (2016) Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation 50–51:13–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoar A (2010) The divide between subsistence and transformational entrepreneurship. Innovation Policy Econom. 10(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2010) Entrepreneurs and professionals: The mediating role of institutions. Res. Sociol. Work 21:27–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, David RJ (2010) Institutions and entrepreneurship. Res. Sociol. Work 21:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SW, Hannigan TJ (2015) Swinging for the fences: How do top accelerators impact the trajectories of new ventures? DRUID Conf. 2015, Rome, 1–30.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2010) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, Hiatt SR (2010) The shape of things to come: Institutions, entrepreneurs, and the case of hedge funds. Res. Sociol. Work 21:157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu S (2015) The impact of accelerators on high-technology ventures. Unpublished doctoral issertation, New York University, New York.Google Scholar