Market Competition and the Effectiveness of Performance Pay

References

• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Autor HD (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baggs J, De Bettignies JE (2007) Product market competition and agency costs. J. Indust. Econom. 55(2):289–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkin DB, Gomez‐Mejia LR (1987) Toward a contingency theory of compensation strategy. Strategic Management J. 8(2):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkin DB, Gomez‐Mejia LR (1990) Matching compensation and organizational strategies. Strategic Management J. 11(2):153–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2007) Incentives for managers and inequality among workers: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 122(2):729–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2013) Team incentives: Evidence from a firm level experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(5):1079–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker B, Gerhart B (1996) The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management J. 39(4):779–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belotti F, Ilardi G (2018) Consistent inference in fixed-effects stochastic frontier models. J. Econometrics 202(2):161–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2016) Bonus culture: Competitive pay, screening, and multitasking. J. Political Econom. 124(2):305–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boning B, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) Opportunity counts: Teams and the effectiveness of production incentives. J. Labor Econom. 25(4):613–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Kim H (2013) Do individuals have preferences used in macro-finance models? An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 60(4):939–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Cadsby CB, Song F, Tapon F (2007) Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: An experimental investigation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):387–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JP, Pritchard RD (1976) Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette MD, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, Chicago), 63–130.Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Findley M, Jensen NM, Meier S, Nielson D (2016) Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(1):116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb JA, Lin KH (2017) Growing apart: The changing firm-size wage premium and its inequality consequences. Organ. Sci. 28(3):429–446.Link, Google Scholar
• Cuñat V, Guadalupe M (2005) How does product market competition shape incentive contracts? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(5):1058–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aveni R (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Management (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Liechty JC, Grewal R (2014) Attribute-level heterogeneity. Management Sci. 61(4):885–897.Link, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Elvira MM, Graham ME (2002) Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and sex-related earnings effects. Organ. Sci. 13(6):601–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Roider A, Sunde U (2016) The role of communication of performance schemes: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 63(12):4061–4080.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrier WJ, Smith KG, Grimm CM (1999) The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. 42(4):372–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friebel G, Heinz M, Krüger M, Zubanov N (2017) Team incentives and performance: Evidence from a retail chain. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2168–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Panico C, Valentini G (2015) Strategic incentives to human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(1):37–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garbers Y, Konradt U (2014) The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 87:102–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Wulf J (2017) Pay harmony? Social comparison and performance compensation in multibusiness firms. Organ. Sci. 28(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B, Fang M (2015) Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:489–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B, Weller I (2017) Compensation. Wilkenson A, Bacon N, Lepak D, Snell S, eds. The Sage Handbook of Human ResourceManagement, 2nd ed. (Sage, London), 210–230.Google Scholar
• Gerhart B, Rynes SL, Fulmer IS (2009) 6 pay and performance: individuals, groups, and executives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):251–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giarratana M, Mariani M, Weller I (2017) Rewards for patents and inventor behaviors in industrial R&D. Acad. Management J. 61(1):264–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Ilk N, Lin M, Zhao JL (2017) When more is less: Field evidence on unintended consequences of multitasking. Management Sci. 64(7):3033–3054.Link, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):286–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris J, Bromiley P (2007) Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. 18(3):350–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Hart OD (1983) The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):366–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE (1992) The effects of competition on executive behavior. RAND J. Econom. 23(3):350–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks JR (1935) Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of monopoly. Econometrica 3(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(Special Issue):24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Lim K (2013) Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprinting effects. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1134–1153.Link, Google Scholar
• Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical efficiency in the stochastic production function model. J. Econometrics 19(2–3):233–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A (2003) Hamburger prices and spatial econometrics. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(4):591–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang J, Han Kim AY (2017) The relationship between CEO media appearances and compensation. Organ. Sci. 28(3):379–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives within differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Miravete EJ, Pernías JC (2012) Competitive pressure and the adoption of complementary innovations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1540–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):199–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay‐for‐performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1194–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lungeanu R, Stern I, Zajac EJ (2016) When do firms change technology‐sourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack. Strategic Management J. 37(5):855–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mani D, Nandkumar A (2016) The differential impacts of markets for technology on the value of technological resources: An application of group‐based trajectory models. Strategic Management J. 37(1):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manthei K, Sliwka D, Vogelsang T (2018) Performance pay and prior learning: Evidence from a retail chain. IZA Discussion Paper 11859, IZA–Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Pearson Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller D (1986) Configurations of strategy and structure: Toward a synthesis. Strategic Management J. 7(3):233–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy‐making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management J. 4(3):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moffatt P (2016) Experimetrics: Econometrics for Experimental Economics (Palgrave, London).Google Scholar
• Newman J, Gerhart B, Milkovich G (2017) Compensation, 12th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Nickell SJ (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J. Political Econom. 104(4):724–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyberg AJ, Maltarich M, Abdusalam D, Essman S, Cragun O (2018) Collective pay for performance: A cross-disciplinary review and meta-analysis. J. Management 44(6):2433–2472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2012) Incentive life-cycles learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):305–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Zenger T (2017) Organization design, proximity, and productivity responses to upward social comparison. Organ. Sci. 28(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1998) The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pierce L (2012) Organizational structure and the limits of knowledge sharing: Incentive conflict and agency in car leasing. Management Sci. 58(6):1106–1121.Link, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Macmillan Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prescott JE (1986) Environments as moderators of the relationship between strategy and performance. Acad. Management J. 29(2):329–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raith M (2003) Competition, risk, and managerial incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(4):1425–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2013) Rationalizing organizational change: A need for comparative testing. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1140–1156.Link, Google Scholar
• Salvaneschi L (1996) Location, Location, Location: How to Select the Best Site for Your Business (Oasis Press, London).Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM (1997) Managerial incentives and product market competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM, Fey L, Thoma C (2017) Competition and incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. 98(September):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Gupta N, Delery JE (2002) Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management J. 23(6):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel PA, Hambrick DC (2005) Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organ. Sci. 16(3):259–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U (2018) Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of U-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions. Adv. Methods Practices Psych. Sci. 1(4):538–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart HC (2017) Structural disruption, relational experimentation, and performance in professional hockey teams: A network perspective on member change. Organ. Sci. 28(2):283–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Tosi HL, Greckhamer T (2004) Culture and CEO compensation. Organ. Sci. 15(6):657–670.Link, Google Scholar
• Vives X (2008) Innovation and competitive pressure. J. Indust. Econom. 56(3):419–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom VH (1964) Work and Motivation (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Vroom G, Gimeno J (2007) Ownership form, managerial incentives, and the intensity of rivalry. Acad. Management J. 50(4):901–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucchini L, Böhmer-Horländer S, Kretschmer T (2018) Competitive pressure: Competitive reactions at the group-level. Indust. Innovation 26(6):643–666.Crossref, Google Scholar