When Reinforcing Processes Generate an Outcome-Quality Dip

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1414

References

  • Arthur B (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (London) 99(394):116–131.Google Scholar
  • Arthur B , Ermoliev YM , Kaniovski YM (1987) Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 30(3):294–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch SE (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Amer. 193(5):31–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P , Stuart T , Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker WE , Faulkner RR (1991) Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(2):279–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabasi A , Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J , Hershey J (1988) Outcome bias in decision evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(4):569–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S , Hirshleifer D , Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change in informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM , Duncan OD (1967) The American Occupational Structure (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bothner M , Podolny J , Smith E (2011) Organizing contests for status: The Matthew effect vs. the mark effect. Management Sci. 57(3):439–457.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bowles S , Gintis H , Osborne M (2001) The determinants of individual earnings: Skills, preferences, and schooling. J. Econom. Lit. 34(4):1137–1176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown AL , Camerer CF , Lovallo D (2012) To review or not to review? limited strategic thinking at the movie box office. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 4(2):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bushman RM , Indjejikian RJ , Smith A (1996) CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. J. Accounting Econom. 21(2):161–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callander S , Hörner J (2009) The wisdom of the minority. J. Econom. Theory 144(4):1421–1439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR , Harrison JR (1994) On the historical efficiency of competition between organizational populations. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(3):720–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G , Sands D , Porac J , Greenberg J (2018) Competitive sensemaking in value creation and capture. Strategy Sci. 3(1):632–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chase ID (1980) Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 45(6):905–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen M , Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Colyvas JA (2012) Performance metrics as formal structures and through the lens of social mechanisms: When do they work and how do they influence? Amer. J. Ed. 118(2):167–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correll SJ , Ridgeway CL , Zuckerman EW , Jank S , Jordan-Bloch S , Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar F , Laureiro-Martínez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dana J , Dawes R , Peterson N (2013) Belief in the unstructured interview: The persistence of an illusion. Judgment Decision Making 8(5):512–520.Google Scholar
  • Dawes RM , Faust D , Meehl PE (1989) Clinical vs. actuarial judgment. Science 243(4899):1668–1674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Vany A (2004) Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J , Liu C (2012) Top performers are not the most impressive when extreme performance indicates unreliability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(24):9331–9336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J , Fang C , Liu C (2019) In search of behavioral opportunities from misattributions of luck. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):896–915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé JPH , Hitsch GJ , Chintagunta P (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elberse A (2013) Blockbusters: Why Big Hits - and Big Risks - Are the Future of the Entertainment Business (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Elberse A , Eliashberg J (2003) Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 22(3):329–354.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eliashberg J , Jonker JJ , Sawhney MS , Wierenga B (2000) Moviemod: An implementable decision-support system for prerelease market evaluation of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 19(3):226–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elman C , Angela MO (2004) The Race is to the swift: Socioeconomic origins, adult education, and wage attainment. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(1):123–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elster J , Moene KO (1989) Introduction. Elster J, Moene KO, eds. Alternatives to Capitalism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–35.Google Scholar
  • Espeland WN , Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eyster E , Rabin M (2014) Extensive imitation is irrational and harmful. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1861–1898.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer CS , Jankowski MS , Lucas SR , Swidler A , Voss K (1996) Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Frank RH (2016) Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Galton F (1907) Vox populi. Nature 74(2):450–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gan H , Park MS , Suh S (2020) Non-financial performance measures, CEO compensation, and firms’ future value. J. Bus. Res. 110(C):213–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gretz RT , Basuroy S (2013) Why quality may not always win: The impact of product generation life cycles on quality and network effects in high-tech markets. J. Retailing 89(3):281–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B , Sant L , Abrahams R (2008) When ‘stars’ migrate, do they still perform like stars? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(1):41–46.Google Scholar
  • Harris M , Raviv A (1978) Some results on incentive contracts with applications to education and employment, health insurance, and law enforcement. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(1):20–30.Google Scholar
  • Herrnstein RJ , Murray C (1994) Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Herrnstein R , Loewenstein G , Prelec D , Vaughan W (1993) Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice. J. Behav. Decision Making 6(1):149–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill BM , Lane D , Sudderth W (1980) A strong law for some generalized urn processes. Ann. Probability 8(2):214–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holbrook MB , Addis M (2007) Taste vs. the market: An extension of research on the consumption of popular culture. J. Consumer Res. 34(3):415–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopwood A (1972) Empirical study of role of accounting data in performance evaluation. J. Accounting Res. 10(1):156–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jencks C (1979) Who Gets Ahead? The Determinants of Economic Success in America (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Karlin S , Rubin H (1956) The theory of decision procedures for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio. Ann. Math. Statist. 27(2):272–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M , Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. 94(4):822–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keum DD , See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kovacs B , Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larrick RP , Soll JB (2006) Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. 52(1):111–127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E , Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M , Montgomery D (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):41–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz SJ , Margolis SE (1995) Path dependence, lock-in, and history. J. Law Econom. Organ. 11(1):205–226.Google Scholar
  • Liu C (2020) Luck: A Key Idea for Business and Society (Routledge, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lynn FB , Podolny JM , Tao L (2009) A sociological (de) construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCoun RJ (2012) The burden of social proof: Shared thresholds and social influence. Psych. Rev. 119(2):345–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1994) Primer on Decision Making : How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG , Sutton RI (1997) Crossroads—Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organ. Sci. 8(3):698–706.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maroto M (2012) The scarring effects of bankruptcy: Cumulative disadvantage across credit and labor markets. Soc. Forces 91(1):99–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall G , Mowen J (1993) An experimental investigation of the outcome bias in salesperson performance evaluations. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 13(1):31–47.Google Scholar
  • Massey C , Thaler R (2013) The loser’s curse: Decision making and market efficiency in the national football league draft. Management Sci. 59(7):1479–1495.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mazmanian M , Beckman C (2018) Making your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):357–379.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Menon A (2018) Bringing cognition into strategic interactions: Strategic mental models and open questions. Strategic Management J. 39(2):168–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer MW (2002) Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond the Balanced Scorecard (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Meyer JW , Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom PR , Roberts J (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(4):S154–S179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H , Chintagunta P , Dubé JP (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58 (QME).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR , Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Ortner SB (2012) Against Hollywood: American independent film as a critical cultural movement. HAU: J. Ethnographic Theory 2(2):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanism. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Park S (2004) Quantitative analysis of network externalities in competing technologies: The VCR case. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(4):937–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum JE (1979) Tournament mobility: Career patterns in a corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):220–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L , Nisbett RE (1991) The Person and the Situation (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sah R , Stiglitz J (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
  • Salganik M , Dodds P , Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schafer MH , Ferraro KF , Mustillo SA (2011) Children of misfortune: Early adversity and cumulative inequality in perceived life trajectories. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(4):1053–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z , Shaver J (2014) Confounding changes in averages with marginal effects: How anchoring can destroy economic value in strategic investment assessments. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1414–1426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharkey P , Elwert F (2011) The legacy of disadvantage: Multigenerational neighborhood effects on cognitive ability. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(6):1934–1981.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simonsohn U (2018) Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of u-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions. Adv. Methods Practice Psych. Sci. 1(4):538–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skvoretz J , Faust K , Fararo TJ (1996) Social structure, networks, and E-state structuralism models. J. Math. Sociol. 21(1):57–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O , Waguespack DM (2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):560–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W (2005) Performance measures: Prevalent and important but methodologically challenging. J. Management Inquiry 14(1):280–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman JD (1989) Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 43(3):301–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Surowiecki J (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tellis G , Yin E , Niraj R (2009) Does quality win? Network effects vs. quality in high-tech markets. J. Marketing Res. XLVI(2):135–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Townley B , Cooper D , Oakes L (2003) Performance measures and the rationalization of organizations. Organ. Stud. 24(4):1045–1071.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van de Rijt A (2019) Self-correcting dynamics in social influence processes. Amer. J. Sociol. 124(5):1468–1495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van de Rijt A , Akin IA , Willer R , Feinberg M (2016) Success-breeds-success in collective political behavior: Evidence from a field experiment. Sociol. Sci. 3(1):940–950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van de Rijt A , Kang SM , Restivo M , Patil A (2014) Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(19):6934–6939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vincenz F , van de Rijt A (2016) Arbitrary inequality in reputation systems. Sci. Rep. 6(38304):1–5.Google Scholar
  • Weibull JW , Mattsson LG , Voorneveld M (2007) Better may be worse: Some monotonicity results and paradoxes in discrete choice under uncertainty. Theory Decision 63(2):121–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B , Karnani A (1987) Competitive strategy under uncertainty. Strategic Management J. 8(2):187–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F , Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW , Kim TY (2003) The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 12(1):27–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.