Social Network Positions, Peer Effects, and Evaluation Updating: An Experimental Test in the Entrepreneurial Context

References

• Abadie A , Athey S , Imbens GW , Wooldridge J (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? NBER Working Paper No. w24003, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ai C , Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM , Glazebrook AR (1982) A negativity bias in interpersonal evaluation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 18(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD (2014) The perils of peer effects. Labour Econ. 30:98–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S , Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Bavelas A (1948) A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organ. 7(3):16–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bavelas A (1950) Communication patterns in task-oriented networks. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 22(6):725–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2014) The transparency trap. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):58–66.Google Scholar
• Bian J , Greenberg J , Li J , Wang Y (2021) Good to go first? Position effects in expert evaluation of early-stage ventures. Working paper, NYU School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Birnbaum M (1972) Morality judgments: Tests of an averaging model. J. Experiment. Psych. 93(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho TL , Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double-standards in a multistate evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action (Academic Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2008) Information and structural holes: Comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2010) Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(3):543–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS , Kilduff M , Tasselli S (2013) Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Rev. Psych. 64:527–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canales R , Greenberg J (2015) A matter of (relational) style: Loan officer consistency and exchange continuity in microfinance. Management Sci. 62(4):1202–1224.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlston DE (1980) The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes. J. Experiment. Social Psych. 16(4):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D , Macy M (2007) Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(3):702–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329(5996):1194–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D (2011) An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334(6060):1269–1272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chown JD , Liu CC (2015) Geography and power in an organizational forum: Evidence from the US Senate chamber. Strategic Management J. 36(2):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couzin-Frankel J (2013) Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study. Science 341(6152):1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano DR , Richey MR (1970) Negative salience in impressions of character: Effects of extremeness of stimulus information. Psychonomic Sci. 90(9):81–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGroot MH (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(345):118–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M , Goodwin J (1994) Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Amer. J. Sociol. 99:1411–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C , Wang Y (2017) Social influence in career choice: Evidence from a randomized field experiment on entrepreneurial mentorship. Res. Policy 46(3):636–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A , Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5):1015–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher LD , Dixon DO , Herson J , Frankowski RK , Hearron MS , Peace KE . (1990) Intention to treat in clinical trials. Peace KE , ed. Statistical Issues in Drug Research and Development (Marcel Dekker, New York), 331–350.Google Scholar
• Fiske ST (1980) Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(6):889–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C , Ghose A , Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman L (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE (2006) A Structural Theory of Social Influence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE , Johnson EC (1990) Social influence and opinions. J. Math. Sociol. 15(3–4):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE , Johnson EC (1999) Social influence networks and opinion change. Adv, Group Processes 16:1–29.Google Scholar
• Gartrell DC (1987) Network approaches to social evaluation. Annual Rev. Sociol. 13:49–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson B , Oberlander E (2008) Wanting to appear smart: Hypercriticism as an indirect impression management strategy. Self Identity 7(4):380–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golub B , Jackson MO (2010) Naïve learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(1):112–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P , Gornall W , Kaplan SN , Strebulaev IA (2019) How do venture capitalists make decisions? J. Financial Econom. 135(1):169–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1:201–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (2014) What you value or what you know? Which mechanism explains the intergenerational transmission of business ownership expectations? Greve HR , Seidel MDL , eds. Adolescent Experiences and Adult Work Outcomes: Connections and Causes (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 85–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (2019a) Inequality and crowdfunding. Landstrom H , Parhankangas A , Mason C , eds. Handbook of Research on Crowdfunding (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 303–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (2019b) What’s alter got to do with it? A consideration of network content and the social ties that provide it. Sociol. Theory 37(3):293–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J , Fernandez RM (2016) The strength of weak ties in MBA job search: A Within-Person test. Sociol. Sci. 3(14):296–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J , Mollick EM (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J , Kuppuswamy V , Mollick E (2020) Gender and the interpretation of signals in crowdfunding. Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Greenberg J , Liu C , tenBrinke L (2020) Why don’t haters act? Peer evaluation, negative relationships, and closure. Working paper, The Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN , Agarwal R , Agarwal R , Gopal A (2019) The role of individual and organizational expertise in the adoption of new practices. Organ. Sci. 30(1):191–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R , Srivastava SB (2014) Bringing agency back into network research: Constrained agency and network action. Brass DJ , Labianca G , Mehra A , Halgin DS , Borgatti SP , eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks , vol. 40 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harary F (1959) A criterion for unanimity in French’s theory of social power. Cartwright D , ed. Studies in Social Power (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 168–182.Google Scholar
• Hasan S , Bagde S (2013) The mechanics of social capital and academic performance in an Indian college. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 78(6):1009–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilbig BE (2009) Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):983–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodges BH (1974) Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(3):378–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L , Pearce JL (2015) The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60:634–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito TA , Larsen JT , Smith K , Cacioppo JT (1998) Negative information weights more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(4):887–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jadbabaie A , Molavi P , Sandroni A , Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) Non-Bayesian social learning. Games Econom. Behav. 76(1):210–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karaca-Mandic P , Norton EC , Dowd B (2012) Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Res. 47(1):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearns M , Suri S , Montfort N (2006) An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks. Science 313(5788):824–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearns M , Judd S , Tan J , Wortman J (2009) Behavioral experiments on biased voting in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(5):1347–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM , Stuart TE , Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Koka BR , Prescott JE (2002) Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management J. 23(9):795–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossinets G , Watts DJ (2009) Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Amer. J. of Sociol. 115(2):405–450.Google Scholar
• Lachin JM (2000) Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Controlled Clinical Trials 21(3):167–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M (2012) Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane JN , Teplitski M , Gray G , Ranu H , Menietti M , Guinan E , Lakhani KR (2020) When do experts listen to other experts? The role of negative information in expert evaluations for novel projects. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper No. 21-007, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Lazersfeld PF , Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Berger M , Abel T , Page CH , eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (Van Nostrand, New York), 18–66.Google Scholar
• Leavitt H (1951) Some effects of certain communication patterns on network performance. J. Abnormal Psych. 46(1):38–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GJ , Sugimoto CR , Zhang G , Cronin B (2013) Bias in peer review. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 64(1):2–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D (2017) Expertise vs. bias in evaluation: Evidence from the NIH. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):60–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu CC (2010) A spatial ecology of structural holes: Scientists and communication at a biotechnology firm. Acad. Management Proc. 2010(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu CC , Srivastava SB (2015) Pulling closer and moving apart: Interaction, identity, and influence in the US Senate, 1973 to 2009. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):192–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lutz RJ (1975) Changing brand attitudes through modification of cognitive structure. J. Consumer Res. 1(4):49–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marmaros D , Sacerdote B (2002) Peer and Social Networks in Job Search. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4-6):870–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marmaros D , Sacerdote B (2006) How do friendships form? Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A , Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M , Smith-Lovin L , Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A , Kilduff M , Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1942) The normative structure of science. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 267–278.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mollick EM (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery JM , Nyhan B , Torres M (2018) How conditioning on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. Amer. J. Political Sci. 62(3):760–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mouw T (2006) Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of recent research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32:79–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4):835–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Rider CI (2009) Constraints on the control benefits of brokerage: A study of placement agents in U.S. venture capital fundraising. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):575–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2015) Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L , Padula G (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5):669–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Rozin P , Royzman EB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Rev. 5(4):296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ , Dodds PS , Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA , Fang C (2014) When hubs forget, lie, and play favorites: Interpersonal network structure, information distortion, and organizational learning. Strategic Management J. 35(7):974–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (2002) Organizational Decision Making (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Shaw ME (1954) Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small networks. J. Psych. 38(1):139–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimbel A (1953) Structural parameters of communication networks. Bull. Math. Biophysics 15:501–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shore J , Bernstein E , Lazer D (2015) Facts and figuring: An experimental investigation of network structure and performance in information and solution spaces. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1432–1446.Link, Google Scholar
• Shrier I , Steele RJ , Verhagen E , Herbert R , Riddell CA , Kaufman JS (2014) Beyond intention to treat: What is the right question? Clinical Trials 11(1):28–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SB (2005) Don’t put my name on it: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):1–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB , Menon T , Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23:67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Soroka SN (2006) Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. J. Politics 68(2):372–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivistava S (2015) Network intervention: A field experiment to assess the effects of formal mentoring on workplace networks. Social Forces 94(1):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suster M (2018) What really happens behind the scenes at VC firms—and how to increase your chances of landing a deal. Inc. (May 25), https://www.inc.com/mark-suster/what-really-happens-behind-scenes-at-vc-firms-and-how-to-increase-your-chances-of-landing-a-deal.html.Google Scholar
• Taylor SE (1991) Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 105:131–142.Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ , An W (2013) Social networks and causal inference. Morgan SL , ed. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 353–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiser B (2015) Faced with legal puzzles, judges often turn to fellow jurists. New York Times (May 19), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/20/nyregion/faced-with-legal-puzzles-judges-often-turn-to-fellow-jurists.html.Google Scholar
• Wu A (2016) Organizational decision-making and information: Angel investments by venture capital partners. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. 2016(1):189–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyer RS (1973) Category ratings as “subjective expected values”: Implications for attitude formation and change. Psych. Rev. 80(6):446–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P , Kuppuswamy V (2017) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.Link, Google Scholar
• Younkin P , Kuppuswamy V (2019) Discounted: The effect of founder race on the price of new products. J. Bus. Venturing 34(2):389–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Umoh E (2018) Top Google recruiter: Google uses this ‘shocking’ strategy to hire the best employees. CNBC online (January 10), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/10/google-uses-this-shocking-strategy-to-hire-the-best-employees.html.Google Scholar
• Zhang J , Brackbill D , Yang S , Becker J , Herbert N , Centola D (2016) Support or competition? How online social networks increase physical activity” A randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine Rep. 4:453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2012) Construction, concentration, and (dis)continuities in social valuations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar