Materiality as a Basis for Valuation Entrepreneurship: Re-modeling Impressionism

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1419

References

  • Abbott A (2001) Chaos of Disciplines (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Albert S , Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
  • Baxandall M (1980) The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Baxandall M (1985) Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker HS (1978) Arts and crafts. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(4):862–889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker HS (1982) Art Worlds (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Becker HS , Faulkner RR , Kirshenblatt-Gimblett B (2006) Editors’ introduction: Art from start to finish. Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, Writing and Other Improvisations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 1–20.Google Scholar
  • Behagg C (1998) Mass production without the factory: Craft producers, guns and small firm innovation, 1790–1815. Bus. History 40(3):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell E , Mangia G , Taylor S , Toraldo ML (2018) The Organization of Craft Work: Identities, Meanings, and Materiality (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beyes T (2017) Colour and organization studies. Organ. Stud. 38(10):1467–1482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boltanski L , Thévenot L (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth , vol. 27 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Born G (2011) Music and the materialization of identities. J. Material Culture 16(4):376–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouillon JP (1986) Sociétés d’artistes et institutions officielles dans la seconde moitié du XIXème siècle. Romantisme 54:89–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1996) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boxenbaum E , Jones C , Meyer RE , Svejenova S (2018) Toward an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organ. Stud. 39(5–6):597–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown AD (2015) Identities and identity work in organizations. Internat. J. Management Rev. 17(1):20–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callen A (2000) The Art of Impressionism: Painting Technique & the Making of Modernity (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Callen A (2015) The Work of Art: Plein Air Painting and Artistic Identity in Nineteenth-Century France (Reaktion Books, London).Google Scholar
  • Carroll GR , Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:255–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G , Ferriani S , Lanza A (2017) Deconstructing the outsider puzzle: The legitimation journey of novelty. Organ. Sci. 28(6):965–992.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caves R (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Cerulo KA (1995) Identity Designs: The Sights and Sounds of a Nation (Rutgers University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Cohendet P , Grandadam D , Simon L , Capdevila I (2014) Epistemic communities, localization and the dynamics of knowledge creation. J. Econom. Geography 14(5):929–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cottington D (1998) Cubism in the Shadow of War: The AvantGarde and Politics in Paris, 1905–1914 (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Cowen T (2000) In Praise of Commercial Culture (Harvard University Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de la Fuente E (2010) In defence of theoretical and methodological pluralism in the sociology of art: A critique of Georgina Born’s programmatic essay. Cultural Sociol. 4(2):217–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delacour H , Leca B (2017) The paradox of controversial innovation: Insights from the rise of impressionism. Organ. Stud. 38(5):597–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeNora T (2000) Music in Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Distel A (1990) Impressionism: The First Collectors (Harry Abrams, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dominguez Rubio F , Silva EB (2013) Materials in the field: Object-trajectories and object-positions in the field of contemporary art. Cultural Sociol. 7(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duret T (1919/1892) Histoire des peintres Impressionnistes: Pissarro, Claude Monet, Sisley, Renoir, Berthe Morisot, Cézanne, Guillaumin (H. Floury, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K , Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenman SF (1992) The intransigent artist or how the Impressionists got their name. Frascina F, Harris J, eds. Art in Modern Culture: An Anthology of Critical Texts (Westview Press, Boulder, CO), 189–197.Google Scholar
  • Emirbayer M , Goodwin J (1994) Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1411–1454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Endrissat N , Islam G , Noppeney C (2016) Visual organizing: Balancing coordination and creative freedom via mood boards. J. Bus. Res. 69(7):2353–2362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S , Azad B (2012) The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, New York), 237–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5):1015–1035.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fuhse JA (2009) The meaning structure of social networks. Sociol. Theory 27(1):51–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R , Karnøe P (2001) Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. Path Dependence and Creation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 1–38.Google Scholar
  • Gell A (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Genet-Delacroix M-C (1992) Art et État sous la IIIe République: Le Système des Beaux-Arts 1870–1940 (Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gherardi S , Perrotta M (2013) Doing by inventing the way of doing: Formativeness as the linkage of meaning and matter. Carlile PR, Nicolini D, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies (Oxford University Press, New York), 227–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson JJ (1982) A preliminary description and classification of affordances. Reed ES, Jones R, eds. Reasons for Realism, (Part II) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 403–406.Google Scholar
  • Gieryn T (2002) What buildings do. Theory Soc. 31(1):35–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gowing L (1988) Cézanne: The Early Years 1859–1872 (Royal Academy of Arts, London).Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R , Suddaby R , Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hesselberth P (2014) Cinematic Chronotopes Here, Now, Me (Bloomsbury Academic, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hokanson A (2016) Turner’s whaling pictures. Bull. Metropolitan Museum Art 73(4):1–48.Google Scholar
  • Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociol . 35(2):441–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huyghe R (1974) Shifts in thought during the Impressionist era: Painting, science, literature, history and philosophy. Impressionism: A Centenary Exhibition, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York), 14–33.Google Scholar
  • Ibarra H , Kilduff M , Tsai W (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):359–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac L (2009) Movements, aesthetics, and markets in literary change: Making the American labor problem novel. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(6):938–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isaacson W (2017) Leonardo da Vinci (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Jones C , Maoret M (2018) Frontiers of creative industries: Exploring structural and categorical dynamics. Jones C , Maoret M , eds. Frontiers of Creative Industries: Exploring Structural and Categorical Dynamics (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C , Massa FG (2013) From novel practice to consecrated exemplar: Unity Temple as a case of institutional evangelizing. Organ. Stud. 34(8):1099–1136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C , Maoret M , Massa FG , Svejenova S (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1870–1975. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1523–1545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C , Meyer R , Jancsary D , Höllerer M (2017) The material and visual basis of institutions. Greenwood R , Oliver C , Lawrence T , Meyer R , eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, New York), 621–646.Google Scholar
  • Joyeux-Prunel B (2005) Nul n’est Prophète en son pays… ” ou la Logique Avant-Gardiste. L’internationalisation de la Peinture des Avant-Gardes Parisiennes, 1855–1914 (Université Paris 1 - Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Joyeux-Prunel B (2015) Les Avant-Gardes Artistiques 1848–1918. Une Histoire Transnationale (Editions Gallimard, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Kaufman J (2004) Endogenous explanation in the sociology of culture. Annual Rev. Sociol. 30:335–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M , Tsai W , Hanke R (2006) A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):1031–1048.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr-Cetina K (1997) Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory Culture Soc. 14(4):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuran T (1995) The inevitability of future revolutionary surprises. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(6):1528–1551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamont M (2012) Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:201–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlais X (1959) La Technique de la Peinture a l’Huile (Flammarion, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social (Cambridge University Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Lee N , Brown S (1994) Otherness and the actor network: The undiscovered continent. Amer. Behav. Sci. 37(6):772–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leighton J (2001) An introduction. Ferretti-Bocquillon M, Distel A, Leighton J, Alyson Stein S, eds. Signac 1863–1935 (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York), 3–23.Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? Leonardi P, Nardi B, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, New York), 25–48.Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2013) Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Inform. Organ. 23(2):59–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM , Barley SR (2008) Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inform. Organ. 18(3):159–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luckman S (2015) Craft and the Creative Economy (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonnell , Terence E (2010) Cultural objects as objects: Materiality, urban space, and the interpretation of AIDS campaigns in Accra, Ghana. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(6):1800–1852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merrill L (1992) A Pot of Paint: Aesthetics on Trial in Whistler v. Ruskin (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Meyer R (1969) A Dictionary of Art Terms and Techniques (Crowell, Springfield, OH).Google Scholar
  • Moeran B (2013) The Business of Creativity: Toward an Anthropology of Worth (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Moliterno T , Mahony DM (2011) Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. J. Management 37(2):443–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicholls T (2015) Tintoretto: Tradition and Identity (Reaktion Books, London).Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ , Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson RA (1990) Why 1955? Explaining the advent of rock music. Popular Music 9(1):97–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitman D (1998) Bazille: Purity, Pose, and Painting in the 1860s (Penn State University Press, University Park, PA).Google Scholar
  • Pratt MG , Rafaeli A (2006) Artifacts and organizations: Understanding our “objective” reality. Artifacts and Organizations. Beyond Mere Symbolism (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 279–288.Google Scholar
  • Pye D (1979) The Art of Workmanship (Royal College of Art, London).Google Scholar
  • Rao H , Monin P , Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rewald J (1973) The History of Impressionism (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rewald J (1974) The Impressionist Brush (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York), 2–4, 54–55.Google Scholar
  • Roberts K , Grabowski M (1996) Organizations, technology and structuring. Clegg S , Hardy C , Nord W , eds. Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage Publishing, New York), 409–423.Google Scholar
  • Rodin A (1983) On Art and Artists: Conversations with Paul Gsell. (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ruskin J (1877) Fors Clavigera (1871–1884), [Letter 79 (18th June 1877).Google Scholar
  • Sennett R (2008) The Craftsman (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Sgourev SV (2013) How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1601–1617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sgourev SV (2020) The Alchemy of painting: How the technology of oil paint transmuted art. Pedersen J , Slavich B , Khaire M , eds. Technology and Creativity (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 37–62.Google Scholar
  • Sgourev SV , Althuizen N (2014) “Notable” or “Not Able”: When are acts of inconsistency rewarded? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):282–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sgourev SV , Althuizen N (2017) Is it a masterpiece? Social construction and objective constraint in the evaluation of excellence. Soc. Psych. Quart. 80(4):289–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw JD , Tangirala S , Vissa B , Rodell JB (2018) New ways of seeing: Theory integration across disciplines. Acad. Management J. 61(1):1–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiner L (2001) The Invention of Art: A Cultural History (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinberg A , Wylie J (1990) Counterfeiting nature: Artistic innovation and cultural crisis in renaissance Venice. Comparative Stud. Soc. History 32(1):54–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strati A (2007) Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learn. 38(1):61–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swidler A (2001) Talk of Love: How Culture Matters (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Tanner J (2010) Michael Baxandall and the sociological interpretation of art. Cultural Sociol.. 4(2):231–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C (1992) The Ethics of Authenticity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilly C (1998) Durable Inequality (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tinterow G (1987) Modern Europe (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York), 8, 6–11.Google Scholar
  • Tinterow G , Loyrette H (1994) Origins of Impressionism (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ullrich P (2004) Workmanship: The hand and body as perceptual tools. Objects and Meaning: New Perspectives on Art and Craft (The Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD), 198–214.Google Scholar
  • Venturi L (1968) Les Archives de l'impressionnisme, Lettres de Renoir, Monet, Pisarro, Sisley, et autres (B. Franklin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weber K , Heinze KL , DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H (1992) Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • White H , White C (1965) Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • White H , Fuhse J , Thiemann M , Buchholz L (2007) Networks and meaning: Styles and switchings. Soziale Systeme 13(1–2):543–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wijnberg NM , Gemser G (2000) Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts. Organ. Sci. 11(3):323–329.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yaneva A (2009) Making the social hold: Toward an actor-network theory of design. Design Culture 1(3):273–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2012) Construction, concentration, and (dis)continuities in social valuations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:223–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW , Kim TY , Ukanwa K , von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or non-entities? Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.