Cooperative Criticism: When Criticism Enhances Creativity in Brainstorming and Negotiation

References

• Allred KM , Chambless DL (2013) The importance of attributions in the prediction of destructive and constructive perceived criticism. Poster presentation, Association of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies annual meeting, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
• Allred KM , Chambless DL (2014) Attributions and race are critical: Perceived criticism in a sample of African American and white community participants. Behav. Therapy 45(6):817–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alper S , Tjosvold D , Law KS (2000) Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psych. 53(3):625–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1982) Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(5):997–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM , Barsade SG , Mueller JS , Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson LM , Pearson CM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):452–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch SE (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psych. Monographs: General Appl. 70(9):1–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer J (2010a) Is creativity domain-specific? Kaufmann J , Sternberg RJ , eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, New York), 321–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M (2010b) The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. J. Appl. Psych. 95(3):592–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer J , Kaufman JC (2008) Gender differences in creativity. J. Creative Behav. 42(2):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett V , Lewis T (1994) Outliers in Statistical Data (Probability & Mathematical Statistics) (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK).Google Scholar
• Barnier AJ , Harris CB , Sutton J (2016) The how’s and why’s of “we” (and “I”) in groups. Behav. Brain Sci. 39:E138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RA (1988) Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. J. Appl. Psych. 73(2):199–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartis S , Szymanski K , Harkins SG (1988) Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 14(2):242–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH , Gillespie JJ (1999) Betting on the future: The virtues of contingent contracts. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(5):155–160.Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH , Neale MA (1992) Negotiating Rationally (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bechtoldt MN , Choi H , Nijstad BA (2012) Individuals in mind, mates by heart: Individualistic self-construal and collective value orientation as predictors of group creativity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(4):838–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beersma B , De Dreu CK (2005) Conflict’s consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(3):358–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouchard TJ Jr , Hare M (1970) Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. J. Appl. Psych. 54(1):51–55.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ , Lakhani KR (2016) Innovation experiments: Researching technical advance, knowledge production, and the design of supporting institutions. Innovation Policy Econom. 16(1):135–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ , Lacetera N , Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Bradley BH , Postlethwaite BE , Klotz AC , Hamdani MR , Brown KG (2012) Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown V , Paulus PB (1996) A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming. Small Group Res. 27(1):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M , Kwang T , Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camacho LM , Paulus PB (1995) The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 68(6):1071–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM , Tewfik BA (2016) Perspective—A new look at conflict management in work groups. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1125–1141.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambless DL , Blake KD (2009) Construct validity of the perceived criticism measure. Behav. Therapy 40(2):155–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chermahini SA , Hommel B (2012) Creative mood swings: Divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psych. Res. 76(5):634–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi H , Cho S , Seo J , Bechtoldt MN (2018) The joint impact of collectivistic value orientation and independent self-representation on group creativity. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 21(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psych. Assessment 6(4):284–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark CW (2008) Estimates of association between cognitive complexity levels and creativity levels of field grade military officers: An exploratory study of the relationship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2nd ed. (Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Connolly T , Jessup LM , Valacich JS (1990) Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sci. 36(6):689–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Coskun H (2011) The effects of group size, memory instruction, and session length on the creative performance in electronic brainstorming groups. Ed. Sci. Theory Practice 11(1):91–95.Google Scholar
• Coskun H , Yilmaz O (2009) A new dynamical model of brainstorming: Linear, nonlinear, continuous (simultaneous) and impulsive (sequential) cases. J. Math. Psych. 53(4):253–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropley A (2006) In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Res. J. 18(3):391–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK (2006) When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. J. Management 32(1):83–107.Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK , Boles TL (1998) Share and share alike or winner take all?: The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(3):253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK , West MA (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1191–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK , Weingart LR , Kwon S (2000) Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(5):889–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW , Weingart LR (2003) Task vs. relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 88:741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delbecq AL , Van de Ven AH , Gustafson DH (1975) Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL), 83–107.Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1949) A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relat. 2:129–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1973) The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Wit FRC , Greer LL , Jehn KA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl M , Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(3):497–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domino G (1974) Assessment of cinematographic creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(1):150–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Zurilla TJ , Nezu A (1980) A study of the generation-of-alternatives process in social problem solving. Cognitive Therapy Res. 4(1):67–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farh JL , Lee C , Farh CI (2010) Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. J. Appl. Psych. 95(6):1173–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fasko D (2001) Education and creativity. Creativity Res. J. 13(3-4):317–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher R , Ury WL , Patton B (1991) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 2nd ed. (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gallupe RB , Dennis AR , Cooper WH , Valacich JS , Bastianutti LM , Nunamaker JF Jr (1992) Electronic brainstorming and group size. Acad. Management J. 35(2):350–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K , Terwiesch C , Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg O , Wiley J (2011) Quality, conformity, and conflict: Questioning the assumptions of Osborn’s brainstorming technique. J. Problem Solving 3(2):96–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo JA , Duguid MM (2012) Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(1):14–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo JA , Chatman JA , Duguid MM , Kennedy JA (2015) Creativity from constraint? How the political correctness norm influences creativity in mixed-sex work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham WK (1977) Acceptance of ideas generated through individual and group brainstorming. J. Soc. Psych. 101(2):231–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grubbs FE (1950) Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. Ann. Math. Statist. 21(1):27–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guilford JP (1950) Creativity. Amer. Psych. 5(9):444–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guilford JP (1968) Intelligence, Creativity and Their Educational Implications (Robert R. Knapp, New York).Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB , Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey S , Kou CY (2013) Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):346–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach (The Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hennessey BA , Amabile TM (2010) Creativity. Annual Rev. Psych. 61:569–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennessey BA , Amabile TM , Mueller JS (2011) Consensual assessment. Runco MA , Pritzker SR , eds. Encyclopedia of Creativity , vol. 1, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, San Diego), 253–260.Google Scholar
• Henningsen DD , Henningsen MLM (2013) Generating ideas about the uses of brainstorming: Reconsidering the losses and gains of brainstorming groups relative to nominal groups. South Comm. J. 78(1):42–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill LA , Brandeau G , Truelove E , Lineback K (2014) Collective Genius: The Art and Practice of Leading Innovation (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hirschberg J (1999) The Creative Priority: Putting Innovation to Work in Your Business (Collins, New York).Google Scholar
• Hommel B , Colzato LS , Fischer R , Christoffels I (2011) Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers Psych. 2:273.Google Scholar
• Huang L , Gino F , Galinsky AD (2015) The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 131:162–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaksen SG , Gaulin JP (2005) A reexamination of brainstorming research: Implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quart. 49(4):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):256–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA , Bendersky C (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:187–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB , Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson DW , Johnson RT , Tjosvold D (2000) Constructive controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. Deutsch M , Coleman PT , eds. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 65–85.Google Scholar
• Karnes MB , McCoy GF , Zehrbach RR , Wollersheim JP , Clarizio HF , Costin L , Stanley LS (1961) Factors associated with underachievement and overachievement of intellectually gifted children. Exceptional Children 28(4):167–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S , Sommer SC (2009) The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. 55(12):1899–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelley T , Littman J (2001) The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Keum DD , See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Kluger AN , DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psych. Bull. 119(2):254–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg TR (1998) Creative thinking, a cognitive aptitude, and integrative joint gain: A study of negotiator creativity. Creativity Res. J. 11(4):283–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR , Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lax DA , Sebenius JK (1986) The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lehrer J (2012) Groupthink: The brainstorming myth. The New Yorker 30(1):22–27.Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ , Hiam A , Olander KW (1996) Think Before You Speak: The Complete Guide to Strategic Negotiation (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Litchfield RC (2008) Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):649–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• London M (1975) Effects of shared information and participation on group process and outcome. J. Appl. Psych. 60(5):537–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace K , Shapiro DL , Weingart LR (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(4):779–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DW (1962) The nature and nurture of creative talent. Amer. Psych. 17(7):484–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maginn BK , Harris RJ (1980) Effects of anticipated evaluation on individual brainstorming performance. J. Appl. Psych. 65(2):219–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCabe MP (1991) Influence of creativity and intelligence on academic performance. J. Creative Behav. 25(2):116–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• McGraw KO , Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psych. Methods 1(1):30–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H , Raisinghani D , Theoret A (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E , Gino F , Argote L (2011) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mnookin RH , Peppet SR , Tulumello AS (1996) The tension between empathy and assertiveness. Negotiation J. 12(3):217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mnookin R , Peppett S , Tulemello A (2000) Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Moffitt M (2004) Contingent agreements: Agreeing to disagree about the future. Marquette Law Rev. 87(4):691–696.Google Scholar
• Mullen B , Johnson C , Salas E (1991) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 12(1):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ (1986) Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psych. Rev. 93(1):23–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ (1997) Managing innovation: When less is more. Calif. Management Rev. 40(1):59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ , Nemeth-Brown B (2003) Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. Paulus PB , Nijstad BA , eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 63–84.Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ , Wachtler J (1983) Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 13(1):45–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth C , Brown K , Rogers J (2001) Devil’s advocate vs. authentic dissent: Stimulating quantity and quality. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 31(6):707–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ , Personnaz B , Personnaz M , Goncalo JA (2004) The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 34(4):365–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishii LH , Goncalo JA (2008) Demographic faultlines and creativity in diverse groups. Phillips KW , ed. Diversity and Groups, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 11 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1948) Your Creative Power: How to Use Imagination (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1963) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 3rd ed. (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Page SE (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parnes SJ , Meadow A (1959) Effects of “brainstorming” instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. J. Ed. Psych. 50(4):171–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB , Dzindolet MT (1993) Social influence processes in group brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(4):575–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB , Nijstad B (2003) Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB , Kohn NW , Arditti LE (2011) Effects of quantity and quality instructions on brainstorming. J. Creative Behav. 45(1):38–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB , Dickson J , Korde R , Cohen-Meitar R , Carmeli A (2016) Getting the most out of brainstorming goups. Markman AB , ed. Open Innovation: Academic and Practical Perspectives on the Journey from Idea to Market (Oxford University Press, New York), 43–70.Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T , Spears R , Cihangir S (2001) Quality of decision making and group norms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6):918–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG (1983) Achieving integrative agreements. Bazerman MH , Lewicki RJ , eds. Negotiating in Organizations (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 35–49.Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG , Rubin JZ (1986) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Puccio GJ , Cabra JF (2010) Organizational creativity: A systems perspective. Kaufmann J , Sternberg RJ , eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, New York), 145–173.Google Scholar
• Putman VL , Paulus PB (2009) Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. J. Creative Behav. 43(1):23–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Raver JL , Jensen JM , Lee J , O’Reilly J (2012) Destructive criticism revisited: Appraisals, task outcomes, and the moderating role of competitiveness. Appl. Psych. 61(2):177–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel EF , Nijstad BA , Stroebe W (2006) Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(2):244–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel EF , Nijstad BA , Stroebe W (2010) The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British J. Psych. 101(1):47–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rispens S (2014) Beneficial and detrimental effects of conflict. Ayoko OB , Ashkanasy NM , Jehn KA , eds. Handbook of Conflict Management Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 19–32.Google Scholar
• Sauermann H , Cohen WM (2010) What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Sci. 56(12):2134–2153.Link, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schuler RS (2015) Nominal group technique. Cooper CL, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, vol. 11, Organizational Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Seta JJ , Seta CE , Donaldson S (1991) The impact of comparison processes on coactors’ frustration and willingness to expend effort. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):560–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaheen R (2010) Creativity and education. Creative Ed. 1(3):166–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE , Gilson LL (2004) What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quart. 15(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons TL , Peterson RS (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):102–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2000) Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. Amer. Psych. 55(1):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel RS , Rothenberg A (1980) Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed vs. separated visual images. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):953–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susskind L , Cruikshank J (1987) Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Susskind LE , Chayes A , Martinez J (1996) Parallel informal negotiation: A new kind of international dialogue. Negotiation J. 12(1):19–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI , Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor DW , Berry PC , Block CH (1958) Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Admin. Sci. Quart. 3(1):23–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson L (2012) The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 5th ed. (Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Thompson L , Hrebec D (1996) Lose–lose agreements in interdependent decision making. Psych. Bull. 120:396–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D (1985) Implications of controversy research for management. J. Management 11(3):21–37.Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D (1998) Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Appl. Psych. 47(3):285–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D (2008) The conflict‐positive organization: It depends upon us. J. Organ. Behav . 29(1):19–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D , Law KS , Sun H (2006) Effectiveness of Chinese teams: The role of conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management Organ. Rev. 2(2):231–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D , Wong AS , Feng Chen NY (2014) Constructively managing conflicts in organizations. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1:545–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B , Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L , Jehn KA , Cummings A (2002) Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. J. Organ. Behav. 23(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton RE , McKersie RB (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Weingart LR , Behfar K , Bendersky C , Todorova G , Jehn KA (2015) The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Acad. Management Rev. 40(2):235–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisskopf-Joelson E , Eliseo TS (1961) An experimental study of the effectiveness of brainstorming. J. Appl. Psych. 45(1):45–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R , Runco MA , Berlow E (2016) Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Res. J. 28(4):385–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson ER , Thompson LL (2014) Creativity and negotiation research: The integrative potential. Internat. J. Conflict Management 25(4):359–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wong EM , Kray LJ , Galinsky AD , Markman KD (2010) Stimulating creativity in groups through mental simulation. Mannix E , Neale M , Goncalo J , eds. Creativity and Groups, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 12 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 111–134.Google Scholar
• Woodman RW , Sawyer JE , Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW , Chabris CF , Pentland A , Hashmi N , Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J , Hoever IJ (2014) Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):333–359.Crossref, Google Scholar