From Help to Harm: Increases in Status, Perceived Under-Reciprocation, and the Consequences for Access to Strategic Help and Social Undermining Among Female, Racial Minority, and White Male Top Managers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1422

References

  • Adams GS , Mullen E (2012) The social and psychological costs of punishing. Behav. Brain Sci. 35(1):15–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreychik MR , Gill MJ (2012) Do negative implicit associations indicate negative attitudes? Social explanations moderate whether ostensible “negative” associations are prejudice-based or empathy-based. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(5):1082–1093.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashburn-Nardo L , Voils CI , Monteith MJ (2001) Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(5):789–799.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Barron OE , Byard D , Yu Y (2008) Earnings surprises that motivate analysts to reduce average forecast error. Accounting Rev. 83(2):303–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsoux JL , Bouquet C (2013) How to overcome a power deficit. MIT Sloan Management Rev. Summer:45–53.Google Scholar
  • Beckman CM , Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bednar MK (2012) Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Acad. Management J. 55(1):131–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belliveau MA , O’Reilly CA , Wade JB (1996) Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(6):1568–1593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billett MT , Qian Y (2008) Are overconfident CEOs born or made? Evidence of self-attribution bias from frequent acquirers. Management Sci. 54(6):1037–1051.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J , Rivas FM (2009) On punishment and well-being. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 72(3):823–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1983) Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy (American Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Camerer CF , Fehr E (2004) Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. Henrich JP, Boyd R, Bowels C, Camerer E, Fehr E, Gintis H, eds. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small‐Scale Societies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 55–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter JP , Matthews PH , Okomboli O (2004) Why punish? Social reciprocity and the enforcement of prosocial norms. J. Evolutionary Econom. 14(4):407–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman CM , Von Hippel W (2001) Attributional mediation of in-group bias. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 37(3):267–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen CC , Meindl JR (1991) The construction of leadership images in the popular press: The case of Donald Burr and People Express. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):521–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conover WJ (1999) Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd edition (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cook A , Glass C (2014) Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO? Strategic Management J. 35(7):1080–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crandall CS , Eshleman A (2003) A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psych. Bull. 129(3):414–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crossland C , Zyung J , Hiller NJ , Hambrick DC (2014) CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Acad. Management J . 57(3):652–674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Aveni RA (1990) Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organ. Sci. 1(2):121–142.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF , Robbins G (2005) Nothing but net? Networks and status in corporate governance. Cetina KK, Preda A, eds. Sociolocy of Financial Markets (Oxford University Press, New York), 290–311.Google Scholar
  • Dehaene S , Changeux JP , Naccache L , Sackur J , Sergent C (2006) Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cognitive Sci. 10(5):204–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Quervain DJF , Fischbacher U , Treyer V , Schellhammer M , Schnyder U , Buck A , Fehr E (2004) The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305(5688):1254–1258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dezsö CL , Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Domhoff GW (2002) Who Rules America? Power and Politics , 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dovidio JF , Penner LA (2001) Helping and altruism. Fletcher G, Clark M, eds. International Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 162–195.Google Scholar
  • Dunbar RIM (1998) Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Duval TS , Silvia PJ (2002) Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(1):49–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ekeh PP (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Fehr E , Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspective 14(3):159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E , Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg M , Willer R , Stellar J , Keltner D (2012) The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(5):1015–1030.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S , Hambrick DC , Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Fiske ST , Taylor SE (2008) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York).Google Scholar
  • Frank KA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociol. Methods Res. 29(2):147–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD , Magee JC , Inesi ME , Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psychol. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graffin SD , Wade JB , Porac JF , McNamee RC (2008) The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers. Organ. Sci. 19(3):457–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graffin SD , Bundy J , Porac JF , Wade JB , Quinn DP (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status the 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2011) Econometric Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Greer TV , Chuchinprakarn N , Seshadri S (2000) Likelihood of participating in mail survey research: Business respondents’ perspectives. Industry Marketing Management 29(2):97–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grice JW , Harris RJ (1998) A comparison of regression and loading weights for the computation of factor scores. Multivariate Behav. Res. 33(2):221–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guala F (2012) Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behav. Brain Sci. 35:1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta VK , Mortal SC , Silveri S , Sun M , Turban DB (2018) You’re fired! Gender disparities in CEO dismissal. J. Management 46(4):560–582.Google Scholar
  • Hambrick DC , Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harman HH (1976) Modern Factor Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Heath A (1976) Rational Choice and Social Exchange: A Critique of Exchange Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Heider F (1976) A conversation with Fritz Heider. Harvey JH, Ickes WJ, Kidd RF, eds. New Directions in Attribution Research (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 47–61.Google Scholar
  • Herring C (2009) Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(2):208–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewstone M , Hantzi A , Johnston L (1991) Social categorization and person memory: The pervasiveness of race as an organizing principle. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 21(6):517–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewstone M , Rubin M , Willis H (2002) Intergroup bias. Annu. Rev. Psych. 53(1):575–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans GC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63(6):597–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacobucci D (1994) Classic factor analysis. Bagozzi RP, ed. Principles of Marketing Research (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK), 279–316.Google Scholar
  • Jackman MR (1994) The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones EE , Nisbett RE (1971) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Jones EE, Kanouse DE, Kelley HH, Nisbett RE, Valins S, Wiener B, eds. Attribution Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Jones JM , Dovidio JF , Vietze DL (2014) The Psychology of Diversity: Beyond Prejudice and Racism ( John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • Kasznik R , Lev B (1995) To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. Accounting Rev. 70(1):113–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeves GD , Westphal JD , McDonald ML (2017) Those closest wield the sharpest knife: How ingratiation leads to resentment and social undermining of the CEO. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):484–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keltner D , Gruenfeld DH , Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kinzler KD , Shutts K , Correll J (2010) Priorities in social categories. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 40(4):581–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koenig AM , Eagly AH , Mitchell AA , Ristikari T (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psych. Bull. 137(4):616–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Komorita SS , Parks CD , Hulbert LG (1992) Reciprocity and the induction of cooperation in social dilemmas. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62(4):607–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kram KE (1985) Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL).Google Scholar
  • Krueger J (1996) Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(3):536–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krusemark EA , Keith Campbell W , Clementz BA (2008) Attributions, deception, and event related potentials: An investigation of the self-serving bias. Psychophysiology 45(4):511–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larcker DF , Rusticus TO (2010) On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. J. Accounting Econom. 49(3):186–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR (2007) Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annu. Rev. Psych. 58:317–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Livingston RW , Pearce NA (2009) The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit black chief executive officers? Psych. Sci. 20(10):1229–1236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorsch JW , MacIver E (1989) Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Lyness KS , Heilman ME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych . 91(4):777–785.Google Scholar
  • Malinowski B (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea (E.P. Dutton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Malmendier U , Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1593–1638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCaslin MJ , Petty RE , Wegener DT (2010) Self-enhancement and theory-based correction processes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(5):830–835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald ML , Westphal JD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald ML , Westphal JD (2010) A little help here? Board control, CEO identification with the corporate elite, and strategic help provided to CEOs at other firms. Acad. Management J. 53(2):343–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGraw KO , Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psych. Methods 1(1):30–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mezulis AH , Abramson LY , Hyde JS , Hankin BL (2004) Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psych. Bull. 130(5):711–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mikhail MB , Walther BR , Willis RH (2004) Earnings surprises and the cost of equity capital. J. Accounting Auditing Financials 19(4):491–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mikulincer M , Shaver PR (2001) Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):97–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milbourn TT (2003) CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. J. Financial Econom. 68(2):233–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller T , del Carmen Triana M (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 46(5):755–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Molm LD (1997) Coercive Power in Social Exchange (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD (2003) Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociol. Theory 21(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD , Peterson G , Takahashi N (2003) In the eye of the beholder: Procedural justice in social exchange. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mulaik SA (2009) Foundations of Factor Analysis (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray MP (2006) Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. J. Econom. Perspective 20(4):111–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler A (2015) The other side of the helping paradigm: Seeking and receiving of help. Schroeder DA, Graziano WG, eds. Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behaviour (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 307–328.Google Scholar
  • Ohtsuki H , Iwasa Y , Nowak MA (2009) Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment. Nature 457(7225):79–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver AG , Krause R , Busenbark JR , Kalm M (2018) BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations. Strategic Management J. 39(1):113–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly CA , Main BG (2010) Economic and psychological perspectives on CEO compensation: A review and synthesis. Industry Corporate Change 19(3):675–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D , Barber BM (2001) Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):87–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park SH , Westphal JD (2013) Social discrimination in the corporate elite: How status affects the propensity for minority CEOs to receive blame for low firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(4):542–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park SH , Westphal JD , Stern I (2011) Set up for a fall: The insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):257–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled LH , Eisenhardt KM , Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perugini M , Gallucci M , Presaghi F , Ercolani AP (2003) The personal norm of reciprocity. Eur. J. Personality 17(4):251–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfarrer MD , Pollock TG , Rindova VP (2010) A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1131–1152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J (1992) Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J , Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Piazza J , Bering JM (2008) Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game. Evolution Human Behav. 29(3):172–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock TG , Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock TG , Rindova VP , Maggitti PG (2008) Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the US IPO market. Acad. Management J. 51(2):335–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portes A (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portes A (2010) Economic Sociology: A Systematic Inquiry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ , Rucker DD , Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price ME , Cosmides L , Tooby J (2002) Punitive sentiment as an anti–free rider psychological device. Evolution Human Behav. 23(3):203–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR , Cotton JL , Miller JS (2000) Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Acad. Management J. 43(6):1177–1194.Google Scholar
  • Regan DT , Straus E , Fazio R (1974) Liking and the attribution process. J. Experiment. Soc. Psychol. 10(4):385–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reuben E , Van Winden F (2008) Social ties and coordination on negative reciprocity: The role of affect. J. Public Econom. 92(1):34–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridley CA , Avery AW (1979) Social network influence on the dyadic relationship. Burgess RL, Huston TL, eds. Social Exchange in Developing Relationships (Academic Press, New York), 223–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross D (2012) Special human vulnerability to low-cost collective punishment. Behav. Brain Sci. 35(1):37–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross M , Sicoly F (1979) Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37:322–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheepers D , Spears R , Doosje B , Manstead ASR (2006) Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(6):944–960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sedikides C , Gregg AP (2008) Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspective Psych. Sci. 3(2):102–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepperd J , Malone W , Sweeny K (2008) Exploring causes of the self-serving bias. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 2(2):895–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shrout PE , Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol. Bull . 86(2):420–428Google Scholar
  • Siegel J , Pyun L , Cheon BY (2019) Multinational firms, labor market discrimination, and the capture of outsider’s advantage by exploiting the social divide. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):370–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer T , Steinbeis N (2009) Differential roles of fairness- and compassion-based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1167(1):41–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith RH (2013) The Joy of Pain: Schadenfreude and the Dark Side of Human Nature (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Sobel ME (1986) Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociol. Methodology 16:159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH , Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays Honor Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, New York), 80–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swart H , Hewstone M , Christ O , Voci A (2011) Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(6):1221–1238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas R Jr (2006) Building on the Promise of Diversity (American Management Association, New York).Google Scholar
  • Thompson DE , DiTomaso N (2012) Ensuring Minority Success in Corporate Management , 2nd ed. (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Thomson GH (1951) The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability , 5th ed. (University of London Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Tsui AS , Egan TD , O’Reilly CA (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):549–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M (1984) The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Vorauer JD , Main KJ , O’Connell GB (1998) How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(4):917–937.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade JB , O’Reilly CA III , Chandratat I (1990) Golden parachutes: CEOs and the exercise of social influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):587–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD (1998) Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management.. Administrative Sci. Quart. 43(3):511–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Management J. 42(1):7–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD , Deephouse DL (2011) Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOs and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1061–1086.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD , Park SH (2012) Unintended agency: Impression management support as a trigger of institutional change in corporate governance. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:23–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD , Stern I (2006) The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(2):169–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD , Stern I (2007) Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at US companies. Acad. Management J. 50(2):267–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD , Park SH , McDonald ML , Hayward ML (2012) Helping other CEOs avoid bad press: Social exchange and impression management support among CEOs in communications with journalists. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):217–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld BM , Wurthmann KA , Hambrick DC (2008) The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):231–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ybarra O (2002) Naive causal understanding of valenced behaviors and its implications for social information processing. Psych. Bull. 128(3):421–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zweigenhaft RL , Domhoff GW (2011) The New CEOs: Women, African American, Latino, and Asian American Leaders of Fortune 500 Companies (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.