The Politics of Learning from Rare Events

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1424

References

  • Anderson J (2020) She hunts viral rumors about real viruses. New York Times (October 13), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/health/coronavirus-vaccine-hesitancy-larson.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage.Google Scholar
  • Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Audia PG, Brion S, Greve HR (2015) Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and the choice of comparison organizations for evaluating organizational performance. Gavetti G, Ocasio W, eds. Advances in Strategic Management: Cognition and Strategy (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 89–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkun M (2013) A Culture of Conspiracy. Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America, 2nd ed. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ rates of experiential and vicarious learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumard P, Starbuck WH (2005) Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning 38(3):281–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BBC News (1997) Bow door blamed for Estonia ferry disaster (December 3), http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/36529.stmGoogle Scholar
  • BBC News (2019) Norway finds ‘Russian spy whale’ off Arctic coast (April 29), https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-48090616.Google Scholar
  • Beck TE, Plowman DA (2009) Experiencing rare and unusual events richly: The role of middle managers in animating and guiding organizational interpretation. Organ. Sci. 20(5):909–924.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Birkland TA (2009) Disasters, lessons learned, and fantasy documents. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 17(3):146–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Björkman A (1996) Letter to the editor—Estonia passengers to be believed. Lloyd’s List (December 30).Google Scholar
  • Björkman A (1997) Letter to the editor—Doubts on where water entered ‘Estonia.’ Lloyd’s List (November 7).Google Scholar
  • Björkman A (1998a) Lies and Truths About the M/V Estonia Accident (Multiprint, Monaco).Google Scholar
  • Björkman A (1998b) Letter to the editor—Fast rescue not the answer for ferries like Estonia. Lloyd’s List (December 8).Google Scholar
  • Björkman A (2018) M/S Estonia—The German experts’ report. Retrieved January 2, 2018, heiwaco.tripod.com/german.htm.Google Scholar
  • Branch T (1988) Parting the Waters: America in the King Years (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bray J (1997) ‘Estonia’ claim slammed. Lloyd’s List (June 19).Google Scholar
  • Brewer J (1996) Sweden in new ‘Estonia’ row. Lloyd’s List (February 6).Google Scholar
  • Brewer J (1997) ‘Bomb theory’ prompts a new legal bid by ‘Estonia’ families. Lloyd’s List (September 26).Google Scholar
  • Brown AD (2004) Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organ. Stud. 25(1):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown-Humes C (1994) Ferries in crisis of confidence. Lloyd’s List (October 3).Google Scholar
  • Casagrande S (1999) Passenger shipping—Explosives ‘played part’ in Estonia loss. Lloyd’s List (August 12).Google Scholar
  • Christianson MK, Farkas M, Sutcliffe KM, Weick KE (2009) Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Museum. Organ. Sci. 20(5):846–860.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke L (1989) Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Clarke L (1999) Mission Improbable (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Cole BM, Chandler D (2019) A model of competitive impression management: Edison vs. Westinghouse in the war of the currents. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):1020–1063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coopey J, Burgoyne J (2000) Politics and organizational learning. J. Management Stud. 37(6):869–885.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornelissen JP, Werner MD (2014) Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):181–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costas J, Grey C (2014) Bringing secrecy into the open: Toward a theorization of the social processes of organizational secrecy. Organ. Stud. 35(10):1423–1447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Figueiredo A, Simas C, Karafillakis E, Paterson P, Larson HJ (2020) Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: A large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study. Lancet 396(10255):898–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekker D, Hansén S (2004) Learning under pressure: The effects of politicization on organizational learning in public bureaucracies. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 14(2):211–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J (2003) Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. 14(3):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J (2008) Superstitious behaviour as a byproduct of intelligent adaptation. Hodgkinson GP, Starbuck WH, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 271–286.Google Scholar
  • Dongowski H (1995) Yard to probe ‘Estonia.’ Lloyd’s List (March 14).Google Scholar
  • Dye KC, Eggers JP, Shapira Z (2014) Trade-offs in a tempest: Stakeholder influence on hurricane evacuation decisions. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1009–1025.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (2019) The Fearless Organization (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Erdbrink T (2020) Documentary casts doubt on official finding in 1994 ferry disaster. New York Times (September 30), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/estonia-ferry-disaster-documentary.html.Google Scholar
  • Eyal G (2019) The Crisis of Expertise (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Fairplay (1994) Smorgasboard (October 13), P26.Google Scholar
  • Feldman MS, March JG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(2):171–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B (1980) For those condemned to study the past: Reflections on historical judgment. Shweder RA, Fiste DW, eds. New Directions for Methodology of Behavioral Science (Jossey- Bass, San Francisco), 79–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fromme H (1995a) Meyer Werft hits back on ‘Estonia.’ Lloyd’s List (March 17).Google Scholar
  • Fromme H (1995b) German study names four keys to ‘Estonia’ tragedy. Lloyd’s List (September 23).Google Scholar
  • Fromme H (1997) Meyer Werft rejects findings. Lloyd’s List (December 4).Google Scholar
  • Gaddis JL (2002) The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Ganz SC (2018) Ignorant decision making and educated inertia: Some political pathologies of organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 29(1):39–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garvin D (2000) Learning in Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • German ‘Group of Experts’ (1999) Estonia ferry disaster, http://www.estoniaferrydisaster.net/estonia%20final%20report/germanxperts.htm.Google Scholar
  • Gilad S (2014) Beyond endogeneity: How firms and regulators coconstruct the meaning of regulation. Law Policy 36(2):134–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray GC, Silbey SS (2014) Governing inside the organization: Interpreting regulation and compliance. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(1):96–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioural Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guest A (1994) ITF in call to upgrade ferry rules. Lloyd’s List (October 4).Google Scholar
  • Guest A (1995a) UK safety statement timing ‘critical.’ Lloyd’s List (April 7).Google Scholar
  • Guest A (1995b) Tight deadline as Norway jumps gun on ro-ro safety. Lloyd’s List (September 9).Google Scholar
  • Guest A (1995c) Norway defends ro-ro rules decision. Lloyd’s List (September 1).Google Scholar
  • Harambam J, Aupers S (2015) Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science. Public Understanding Sci. 24(4):466–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):609–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henley J (1996a) ‘Estonia’ investigator resigns. Lloyd’s List (July 25).Google Scholar
  • Henley J (1996b) Resignation may delay ferry report. Lloyd’s List (July 26).Google Scholar
  • Henley J (1996c) ‘Estonia’ visor pinpointed. Lloyd’s List (December 4).Google Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman J, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1994) Information on the composition of the panel of experts (December).Google Scholar
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1997) IMO and ro-ro safety (January).Google Scholar
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2010) Information resources on ‘The Estonia’ (January).Google Scholar
  • Joint Accident Investigation Commission (JAIC) (1997) M/S Estonia 28 September, 1994. The final report. Retrieved January 10, 2009, http://www.multi.fi/estonia/estorap.html.Google Scholar
  • Johnson KL, Smith Jr KM (2009) Failure Analysis of the Estonia. Adv. Materials Processes 167(6):29–33.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kinzer S (1994) Little hope for 800 lost in sinking of Baltic Sea ferry. New York Times (September 29), https://www.nytimes.com/1994/09/29/world/little-hope-for-800-lost-in-sinking-of-baltic-sea-ferry.html.Google Scholar
  • Kipping M, Üsdiken B (2014) History in organization and management theory: More than meets the eye. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):535–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight E, Tsoukas H (2019) When fiction trumps truth: What ‘post-truth’ and ‘alternative facts’ mean for management studies. Organ. Stud. 40(2):183–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampel J, Shamsie J, Shapira Z (2009) Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 20(5):835–845.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Langewiesche W (2004) The Outlaw Sea: A World of Freedom, Chaos, and Crime (North Point Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Law J (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence TB, Mauws MK, Dyck B, Kleysen RF (2005) The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):180–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee GK, Lampel J, Shapira Z (2020) After the storm has passed: Translating crisis experience into useful knowledge. Organ. Sci. 31(4):1037–1051.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipartito K (2015) Historical sources and data. Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, eds. Organizations in Time: History, Theory and Methods (Oxford University Press,Oxford, UK), 284–304.Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1994a) Steering group will advise that study must cover ‘every aspect’ of ferry safety (October 28).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1994b) Estonia bow visor ‘had been closed (November 22).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1995a) Modification plan may not prove hugely expensive (January 26).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1995b) Editorial: Missing links (March 17).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1995c) Germany slams ‘Estonia’ report (April 11).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1995d) Salvage—ex-diver unveils ‘Estonia’ plan (May 19).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1995e) UK will press for changes at cost up to #1M a ship (July 28).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1996a) Ferry flood doors set trend (January 3).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1996b) Special report: Safety and the environment—Europe makes its tough message clear (April 11).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1996c) Special report: Ro-ro ferry safety—ensuing survival after accidents (November 16).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1996d) Special report: Ro-ro ferry safety—rule changes culminate in Stockholm agreement (November 16).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (1997) Maintenance blamed in ‘Estonia’ report (June 17).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (2000a) Disbelief at findings of Estonia report (September 7).Google Scholar
  • Lloyd’s List (2000b) New bombshell as Estonia row goes on (December 16).Google Scholar
  • MacKenzie D (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Madsen PM (2009) These lives will not be lost in vain: Organizational learning from disaster in U.S. coal mining. Organ. Sci. 20(5):861–875.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM, Desai V (2018) No firm is an island: The role of population-level actors in organizational learning from failure. Organ. Sci. 29(4):739–753.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Magnusson K (2009) Set on finding the right stuff. Shipgaz 2:44–47.Google Scholar
  • Maquire S, Hardy C (2009) Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Acad. Management J. 52(1):148–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics 24(4):662–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (2010) The Ambiguity of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Olsen JP (1995) Democratic Governance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maslach D, Branzei O, Rerup C, Zbaracki MJ (2018) Noise as a signal in learning from rare events. Organ. Sci. 29(2):225–246.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur A (1998) A Hazardous Inquiry: The Rashomon Effect at Love Canal (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • McLaughlin J (2000) Bemis to defy Stockholm and dive to wreck of Estonia. Lloyd’s List (July 22).Google Scholar
  • Meyer R, Kunreuther H (2017) The Ostrich Paradox: Why We Underprepare for Disasters (Wharton School Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Mezias JM, Starbuck WH (2003) Studying the accuracy of managers’ perceptions: A research odyssey. British J. Management 14(1):3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner AS, Haunschild P (1995) Population level learning. Cummings L, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 15 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), 115–166.Google Scholar
  • Mulrenan J (1994a) Estonia sinks—800 feared dead. Lloyd’s List (September 29).Google Scholar
  • Mulrenan J (1994b) ‘Estonia’ visor broken away. Lloyd’s List (October 3).Google Scholar
  • Mulrenan J (1994c) Marine safety experts respond following Estonia disaster. Lloyd’s List (October 4).Google Scholar
  • Nigam A, Ocasio W (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s healthcare reform initiative. Organ. Sci. 21(4):823–841.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C (1999) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Plotkin S (2014) History of vaccination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(34):12283–12287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pondy LR (1992) Reflections on organizational conflict. J. Organ. Behav. 13(3):257–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner F (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—a review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prescott J (1995) First traverse doors to be fitted next month. Lloyd’s List (December 1).Google Scholar
  • Prescott J (1996) Consortium to encase ‘Estonia.’ Lloyd’s List (January 12).Google Scholar
  • Proctor RN, Schiebinger L (2008) Agnotology. The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Rabe J (2002) Die Estonia. Tragödie eines Schiffsuntergangs (Delius Klasing, Bielefeld, Germany).Google Scholar
  • Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crisis. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rilinger G (2019) Corporate conspiracies and complex secrets: Structure and perception of the Insull Scheme in 1930s Chicago. Amer. J. Sociol. 124(4):1043–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roose K (2020) Get ready for a vaccine information war. New York Times (May 13), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/technology/coronavirus-vaccine-disinformation.html.Google Scholar
  • Rowlinson M, Hassard J, Decker S (2014) Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):250–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagan SD (1992) Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Salvato C, Rerup C (2018) Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):170–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shilts R (1988) And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shuker L (1996a) Sweden may face action on ‘Estonia.’ Lloyd’s List (August 14).Google Scholar
  • Shuker L (1996b) ‘Estonia’ accusations. Lloyd’s List (October 23).Google Scholar
  • Silverstein AM (2009) A History of Immunology, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, London).Google Scholar
  • Soroush V, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Speares S (1997) Row over ‘Estonia’ report. Lloyd’s List (December 4).Google Scholar
  • Starbuck WH (2009) Cognitive reactions to rare events: Perceptions, uncertainty, and learning. Organ. Sci. 20(5):925–937.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck WH, Farjoun M (2005) Organization at the Limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Stern AM, Markel H (2005) The history of vaccines and immunization: Familiar patterns, new challenges. Health Affairs 24(3):611–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson WB, Pearce JL, Porter LW (1985) The concept of “coalition” in organization theory and research. Acad. Management Rev. 10(2):256–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Sullivan B (2010) Competition and beyond: Problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organ. Sci. 12(2):432–450.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • SVT (2004) War materials smuggled on Estonia. Uppdrag Granskning. Retrieved January 10 2014, https://web.archive.org/web/20110613015500/http:/svt.se/2.13038/1.293822/translation_in_english.Google Scholar
  • Tetlock P (2017) Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilly C (2006) Why? What Happens When People Give Reasons . . . and Why. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Rev. 45(2):55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vassalos D, Papanikolaou A (2002) Stockholm Agreement—past, present, future (Part 1). Marine Technol. 39(3):137–158.Google Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Ventresca MJ, Mohr JW (2002) Archival research methods. Baum JAC, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 805–828.Google Scholar
  • Wadhwani RD (2014) Schumpeter’s plea: Historical reasoning in entrepreneurship theory and research. Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, eds. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–23.Google Scholar
  • Wagner JA, Gooding RZ (1997) Equivocal information and attribution: An investigation of patterns of managerial sensemaking. Strategic Management J. 18(4):275–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1991) The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):116–124.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson D (2006) The Hole. Another Look at the Sinking of the Estonia Ferry on September 28, 1994 (Diggory Press, Cornwall, UK).Google Scholar
  • WISE (1996) Estonia: Sunk due to n-cargo? Nuclear Monitor issue, no. 452 (May 17), https://www.wiseinternational.org/nuclear-monitor/452/estonia-sunk-due-n-cargoGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki MJ (1998) The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):602–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):894–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M (2009) Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organ. Sci. 20(5):894–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.