Attentional Engagement as Practice: A Study of the Attentional Infrastructure of Healthcare Chief Executive Officers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1427

References

  • Aguilar FI (1967) Scanning the Business Environment (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Anderson MH (2008) Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities. J. Organ. Behav. 29(1):51–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman and Hall, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P , Kim A , Wood MO (2018) Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Acad. Management Rev. 43(2):217–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bateson G (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity (E. P. Dutton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calori R , Johnson G , Sarnin P (1994) CEOs’ cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management J. 15(6):437–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson S (1951) Executive Behavior: A Study of the Work Load and the Working Methods of Managing Directors (Strömberg, Stockholm).Google Scholar
  • Choo CW (2001) Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning. Inform. Res. 7(1), http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper112.html.Google Scholar
  • Citton Y (2017) The Ecology of Attention (Polity Press, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Czarniawska B (2007) Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies (Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö, Sweden).Google Scholar
  • Daft RL , Sormunen J , Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance—An empirical study. Strategic Management J. 9(2):123–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH , Beck JC (2001) The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business (Harvard Business Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Alwis G , Majid S , Chaudhry AS (2006) Transformation in managers’ information seeking behaviour: A review of the literature. J. Inform. Sci. 32(4):362–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmunds A , Morris A (2000) The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. Internat. J. Inform. Management 20(1):17–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM , Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feather J (1998) The Information Society: A Study of Continuity and Change (Library Association, London).Google Scholar
  • Feldman MS , Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M , Worline M (2016) The practicality of practice theory. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 15(2):304–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez-Duque D , Johnson ML (1999) Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Sci. 23(1):83–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fidel R , Green M (2004) The many faces of “accessibility”: Engineers’ perception of information sources. Inform. Processing Management 40(3):563–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garg VK , Walters BA , Priem RL (2003) Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management J. 24(8):725–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gee JP (1990) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (Falmer Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Gioia DA , Corley KG , Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harper and Row, London).Google Scholar
  • Golden-Biddle K , Locke K (2007) Composing Qualitative Research (Sage, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall ET (1976) Beyond Culture (Anchor, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
  • Hambrick DC (1982) Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management J. 3(2):159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick DC , Mason MA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman A J, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.Google Scholar
  • Hudson A (2016) Simpler, clearer, more stable. Integrated accountability for integrated care (The Health Foundation, London).Google Scholar
  • James W (1890) The Principles of Psychology (Henry Holt and Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones R (2005) Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. Norris, S , Jones, R , eds. Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis (Routledge, London), 141–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones BD , Baumgartner FR (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Joseph J , Ocasio W (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management J. 33(6):633–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kabanoff B, Brown S (2008) Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: Content, structure, stability, and performance. Strategic Management J. 29(2):149-171.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2008) Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Acad. Management J. 51(4):672–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D , Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K , Feldman M , Golden-Biddle K (2015) Discovery, validation and live coding. Elsbach, KE , Kramer, R , eds. The Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Taylor and Francis, Abingdon, VA), 371–380.Google Scholar
  • McDonald S (2005) Studying actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Res. 5(4):455–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miettinen R , Samra-Fredericks D , Yanow D (2009) Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organ. Stud. 30(12):1309–1327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D (1991) Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. 37(1):34–52.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (2009) Managing (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nag R , Gioia DA (2012) From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm-specific use of knowledge as a resource. Acad. Management J. 55(2):421–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
  • Nicolini D , Monteiro P (2016) The practice approach: For a praxeology of organisational and management studies. Tsoukas H , Langley A , eds. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies (SAGE, London), 110–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D , Korica M , Ruddle K (2015) Staying in the know. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 56(4):57–65.Google Scholar
  • Nigam A , Ocasio W (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics. Organ. Sci. 21(4):823–841.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W , Joseph J (2008) Rise and fall -- or transformation?: The evolution of strategic planning at the General Electric Company, 1940–2006. Long Range Planning 41(3):248–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W , Wohlgezogen F (2010) Attention and control. Sitkin SB , Cardinal LB , Bijlsma-Frankema, KM , eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, London), 191–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W , Laamanen T , Vaara E (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention‐based view of strategic change. Strategic Management J. 39(1):155–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew KE (1999) Waiting for chiropody. Inform. Processing Management 35(6):801–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plungis J , Hull D (2015) VW’s emissions cheating found by curious clean-air group. Bloomberg Business Online (September 19), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-19/volkswagen-emissions-cheating-found-by-curious-clean-air-group.Google Scholar
  • Ragin CC , Becker HS , eds. (1992) What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
  • Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schatzki TR (2005) Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organ. Stud. 26(3):465–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoemaker PJH (2019) Attention and foresight in organizations. Futures Foresight Sci. 1(1):e5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schutz A , Wagner HR , ed. (1970) Alfred Schultz on Phenomenology and Social Relations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Shepherd DA , Mcmullen JS , Ocasio W (2017) Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management J. 38(3):626–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinhart and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Star SL , Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):111–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck WH , Milliken FJ (1988) Executives’ perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. Hambrick D , ed. The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 35–65.Google Scholar
  • Stewart R (1967) Managers and Their Jobs (MacMillan, Basingstoke, UK). Google Scholar
  • Stewart R (1976) Contrasts in Management: A Study of Different Types of Managers Jobs, Their Demands and Choices (McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK).Google Scholar
  • Sutcliffe KM (1994) What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1360–1378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tengblad S (2006) Is there a ‘new managerial work’? A comparison with Henry Mintzberg’s classic study 30 years later. J. Management Stud. 43(7):1437–1461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas JB , Clark SM , Gioia DM (1993) Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 36(2):239–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D , Dahlander L , Haas MR , George G (2015) Information, attention, and decision making. Acad. Management J. 58(3):649–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1988) Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. J. Management Stud. 25(4):305–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolcott HF (2003) The Man in the Principal’s Office: An Ethnography (Rowman Altamira).Google Scholar
  • Wu W (2011) Attention as selection for action. Mole C , Smithies D , Wu W , eds. Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 97–116.Google Scholar
  • Yanow D , Schwartz-Shea P , eds. (2006) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn (M E Sharpe, Armonk, NY).Google Scholar
  • Yoshida H , Burling JM (2011) A new perspective on embodied social attention. Cognitive Brain Behav. 15(4):535–552.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.