Seeing What Others Miss: A Competition Network Lens on Product Innovation

References

• Agarwal R , Helfat CE (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P , Van Reenen J , Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G , Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G , Katila R (2004) Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):887–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G , Soda G , Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Association for Competitive Technology (2002) Microsoft Tunney Act Comment, United States Department of Justice Antitrust Documents Group, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Baum J , Calabrese T , Silverman B (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21:267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham C , Davis J (2012) Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Management J . 55(3):611–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R , Griffith R , Van Reenen J (1995) Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econom. J. 105(429):333–344.Google Scholar
• Borgatti S , Lopez-Kidwall V (2011) Network theory. Scott J, Carrington P, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis (SAGE Publications, London), 40–54.Google Scholar
• Braha D , Stacey B , Bar-Yam Y (2011) Corporate competition: A self-organized network. Soc. Networks 33(3):219–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SV , Tucker JW (2011) Large-sample evidence on firms’ year-over-year MD&A modifications. J. Accounting Res. 49(2):309–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burshell J , Mitchell W (2017) The social construction of market categories: How proximate social space creates strategic incentives to be early claimants of the fiscal sponsor label. Res. Sociol. Organ. 50:171–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1988) The stability of American markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(2):356–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2010) Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Campbell-Kelly M (2003) From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog: A History of the Software Industry (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cattani G , Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G , Porac J , Thomas H (2017) Categories and competition. Strategic Management J. 38:64–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK , Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. 31(9):917–945.Google Scholar
• Chen MJ (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):100–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ , Su KH , Tsai W (2007) Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Acad. Management J. 50(1):101–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark B , Montgomery D (1999) Managerial identification of competitors. J. Marketing 63(3):67–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarkson G , Toh PK (2010) “Keep out” signs: The role of deterrence in the competition for resources. Strategic Management J. 31:1202–1225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clay DG (2002) Institutional ownership and firm value. Preprint, submitted January 13, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.485922.Google Scholar
• Cohen JE , Lemley MA (2001) Patent scope and innovation in the software industry. Calif. Law Rev. 89(1):3–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W , Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs R , Narandren P , Richards A (1996) A literature-based innovation output indicator. Res. Policy 25(3):403–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cragg JG , Donald SG (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econom. Theory 9(2):222–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedman E , Lennox C (2009) Perceived competition, profitability and the withholding of information about sales and the cost of sales. J. Accounting Econom. 48(2–3):210–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downing ST , Kang JS , Markman G (2019) What you don’t see can hurt you: Awareness cues to profile indirect competitors. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1872–1900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durbin J (1954) Errors in variables. Rev. Internat. Statist. Institute 22(1):23–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC , Bohmer RM , Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers J , Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier WJ , Smith KG , Grimm CM (1999) The role of competitive action in market share erosion: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. 42(4):372–388.Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L , Mingo S , Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2011) Enterprise software: Market definitions. Gartner Research Notes , Gartner Research, Stamford CT.Google Scholar
• Ghosh A , Ranganathan R , Rosenkopf L (2016) The impact of context and model choice on the determinants of strategic alliance formation: Evidence from a staged replication study. Strategic Management J. 37(11):2204–2221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giachetti C , Dagnino G (2014) Detecting the relationship between competitive intensity and firm product line length: Evidence from the worldwide mobile phone industry. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1398–1409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J (2004) Competition within and between networks: The contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 47(6):820–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J , Woo C (1996) Economic multiplexity: The structural embeddedness of cooperation in multiple relations of interdependence. Baum J, Dutton J, eds. Advances in Strategic Management (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 323–361.Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H , Taylor A (2000) Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:54–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R , Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R , Nohria N , Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. 21(3):203–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B , Jaffe A , Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hambrick D , Humphrey S , Gupta A (2015) Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management J. 36(3):449–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L , Singleton K (1982) Generalized instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica 50(5):1269–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(46):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J , Borjas G (1980) Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions, and answers. Economica 47(187):257–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40(12):1720–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G , Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Polit. Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmberg L , Mathiassen L (2001) Survival patterns in fast-moving software organizations. IEEE Software 18(6):51–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh KY , Tsai W , Chen MJ (2015) If they can do it, why not us? Competitors as reference points for justifying escalation of commitment. Acad. Management J. 58(1):38–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh KY , Vermeulen F (2014) The structure of competition: How competition between one’s rivals influences imitative market entry. Organ. Sci. 25(1):299–319.Link, Google Scholar
• Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Huber G , Daft R (1987) The information environments of organizations. Jablin L, Putnam L, Roberts K, Porter L, eds. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 130–164.Google Scholar
• Joseph J , Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision making: A retrospective and roadmap for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R , Adner R (2012) What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1227–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R , Chen E (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R , Thatchenkery S (2014) Distant search . Teece D , Augier M , Helfat C , eds. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Katila R , Thatchenkery S , Christensen MQ , Zenios S (2017) Is there a doctor in the house? Expert product users, organizational roles, and innovation. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2415–2437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff G , Elfenbein H , Staw B (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K , Gopal A , Hoberg G (2016) Does product market competition drive CVC investment? Evidence from the U.S. IT industry. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):259–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar P , Zaheer A (2019) Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances. Acad. Management J. 62(3):691–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leatherbee M , Katila R (2020) The lean startup method: Early-stage teams and hypothesis-based probing of business ideas. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 14(4):570–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewellen S (2013) Executive compensation and peer effects. Working paper. Yale University Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Li F , Lundholm R , Minnis M (2013a) A measure of competition based on 10-K filings. J. Accounting Res. 51(2):399–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q , Maggitti P , Smith K , Tesluk P , Katila R (2013b) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Acad. Management J. 56(3):893–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeler L (2002) Comments of the Computing Technology Industry Association on the revised proposed final judgment in United States v. Microsoft.Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni G , Lipparini A (1999) The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 20(4):317–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM , Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, Nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menard S (2001) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Miller D , Chen MJ (1994) Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C , Zaltman G , Deshpande R (1992) Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):314–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ndofor H , Vanevenhoven J , Barker V (2013) Software firm turnarounds in the 1990s: An analysis of reversing decline in a growing, dynamic industry. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1123–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R , Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J , Powell W (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC , Katila R , Eisenhardt KM (2015) Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):596–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps C (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F , Toh PK (2011) Letting rivals come close or warding them off? The effects of substitution threat on imitation deterrence. Acad. Management J. 54(2):369–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F , Ahuja G , Mitchell W (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac J , Thomas H , Wilson F , Paton D , Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R , Glynn MA , Tushman M (2019) Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1013–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N , Spreitzer GM (1997) Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):48–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rauh JD , Sufi A (2012) Explaining corporate capital structure: Product markets, leases, and asset similarity. Rev. Finance 16(1):115–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reger R , Huff A (1993) Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J. 14(2):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reger R , Palmer T (1996) Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organ. Sci. 7(1):22–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhee L , Leonardi PM (2018) Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1188–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP , Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodan S , Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25(6):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharapov D , Ross JM (2019) Whom should a leader imitate? Using rivalry-based imitation to manage strategic risk in changing environments. Strategic Management J. , ePub ahead of print December 8, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M (2015) Technology shocks, technological collaboration, and innovation outcomes. Organ. Sci. 26(3):668–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling M , Phelps C (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven C , Eisenhardt K , Lyman K (1990) Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):177–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG , Smith KA , Olian J , Sims H Jr , O’Bannon D , Scully J (1994) Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):412–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Standard & Poor’s (2013) S&P 500 Fact Sheet. S&P Dow Jones Indices. Accessed June 11, 2013, http://www.spindices.com/documents/factsheets/fs-sp-500-ltr.pdf.Google Scholar
• Stock JH , Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews D, Stock J, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatchenkery S (2017) Competitive Intelligence: Drivers and Consequences of Executives’ Attention to Competitors (Stanford University, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Thatchenkery S , Katila R (2021) Innovation and profitability following antitrust intervention against a dominant platform: The wild, wild west? Working paper, School of Management, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Toh PK , Kim T (2013) Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1214–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai W , Su KH , Chen MJ (2011) Seeing through the eyes of a rival: Competitor acumen based on rival-centric perceptions. Acad. Management J. 54(4):761–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandaie R , Zaheer A (2014) Surviving bear hugs: Firm capability, large partner alliances, and growth. Strategic Management J. 35:566–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Virany B , Tushman M , Romanelli E (1992) Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organ. Sci. 3(1):72–91.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson A , Joseph J (2015) Organizational attention and technological search in the multibusiness firm: Motorola from 1974 to 1997. Cognition and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 32 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 407–435.Google Scholar
• Wu DM (1973) Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica 41(4):733–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young G , Smith KG , Grimm C (1996) “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organ. Sci. 7(3):243–254.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A , Soda G (2009) Network evolution: The origin of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A , Usai A (2004) The social network approach in strategy research: Theoretical challenges and methodological issues. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 67–86.Google Scholar
• Zahra SA , Bogner WC (2000) Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. J. Bus. Venturing 15(2):135–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ , Bazerman MH (1991) Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perceptions for strategic decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar