Adaptation or Persistence? Emergence and Revision of Organization Designs in New Ventures

References

• Ambos TC, Birkinshaw J (2010) How do new ventures evolve? An inductive study of archetype changes in science-based ventures. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1125–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C (2015) In the shadow of the crowd: A comment on “Valve’s way.” J. Organ. Design 4(2):5–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1968) The Functions of the Executive, 30th Anniversary ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Burton MD, Hannan MT (1996) The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):239–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Burton MD, Hannan MT (1999b) Engineering bureaucracy: The genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in high-technology firms. J. Law Econom. Organ. 15(1):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (1999a) Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(4):527–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barton MA, Sutcliffe KM (2009) Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: Organizational safety as a social achievement. Human Relations 62(9):1327–1356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Menahem SM, von Krogh G, Erden Z, Schneider A (2016) Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1308–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1989) Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Acad. Management J. 32(3):489–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W, Goodstein J (1991) Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Acad. Management J. 34(4):805–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant PT (2014) Imprinting by design: The microfoundations of entrepreneurial adaptation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 38(5):1081–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Burton MD (2001) The company they keep: Founders’ models for organizing new firms. Schoonhoven CB, Romanelli E, eds. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 13–39.Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 229–262.Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Håkonsson DD, Nickerson J, Puranam P, Workiewicz M, Zenger T (2017) GitHub: Exploring the space between boss-less and hierarchical forms of organizing. J. Organ. Design 6(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociol. 6(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christianson MK (2019) More and less effective updating: The role of trajectory management in making sense again. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):45–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christianson MK, Farkas MT, Sutcliffe KM, Weick KE (2008) Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organ. Sci. 20(5):846–860.Link, Google Scholar
• Churchill NC, Lewis VL (1983) The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Bus. Rev. 61(3):30–50.Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Holt R, Zundel M (2011) The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organ. Stud. 32(12):1701–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1155–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME, Sonenshein S (2016) Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1113–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Ozcan S, Reichstein T (2019) Falling not far from the tree: Entrepreneurs and organizational heritage. Organ. Sci. 30(2):337–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):505–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Aguinis H (2017) Using theory elaboration to make theoretical advancements. Organ. Res. Methods 20(3):438–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Saebi T (2017a) Business models and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Planning 51(1):9–21Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Saebi T (2017b) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. J. Management 43(1):200–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1994) Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gartner WB (2016) Entrepreneurship as Organizing: Selected Papers of William B. Gartner (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Jain S, Tuertscher P (2008) Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organ. Stud. 29(3):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Greiner LE (1972) Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. 50(4):37–46.Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Burton MD, Baron JN (1996) Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):503–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski PA, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson V (2007) What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):97–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakatos I (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 91–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laloux F (2014) Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage in Human Consciousness (Nelson Parker, Brussels).Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Abdallah C (2011) Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ, eds. Building Methodological Bridges, Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. 6 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 201–235.Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ (1999) Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979-1999. J. Vocational Behav. 55(2):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Lippmann S, Aldrich HE (2015) A rolling stone gathers momentum: Generational units, collective memory, and entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Rev. 41(4):658–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):57–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantere S, Ketokivi M (2013) Reasoning in organization science. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Markides C (1999) All the Right Moves: A Guide to Crafting Breakthrough Strategy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Marquis C (2003) The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):655–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):195–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massa L, Tucci CL, Afuah A (2017) A critical assessment of business model research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):73–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milanov H, Shepherd DA (2013) The importance of the first relationship: The ongoing influence of initial network on future status. Strategic Management J. 34(6):727–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Miller D, Friesen PH (1982) Structural change and performance: Quantum vs. piecemeal-incremental approaches. Acad. Management J. 25(4):867–892.Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Dumville BC (2001) Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, And Challengers (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Popper KR (2002) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge classic ed. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Sutton RI (2014) Scaling Up Excellence: Getting to More Without Settling for Less (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Reynolds PD, Carter NM, Gartner WB, Greene PG (2004) The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Bus. Econom. 23(4):263–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Morrison JB, Carroll JS (2009) The dynamics of action-oriented problem solving: Linking interpretation and choice. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):733–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K (2004) Agile Project Management with Scrum (Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA).Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2009) Hiding the evidence of valid theories: How coupled search processes obscure performance differences among organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):602–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z, Fox BC, Heavey C (2015) “What’s past is prologue”: A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. J. Management 41(1):288–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:171–222.Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):539–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Holton JA, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, Levina N, Glaser B (2015a) Rejoinder: Moving the management field forward. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):620–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Holton JA, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, Levina N, Glaser B (2015b) What grounded theory is…A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):581–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2008) Revisiting the strategy, structure, and performance paradigm: The case of venture capital. Organ. Sci. 19(2):241–259.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Whittington R (2015) Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. Golsorkhi D, Seidl D, Vaara E, Rouleau L, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Zenger T (2015) Valve Corporation: Composing internal markets. J. Organ. Design 4(2).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R (2007) Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 18(2):181–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R (2013) The business model: A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis. Strategic Organ. 11(4):403–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar