How Do Institutional Carriers Alleviate Normative and Cognitive Barriers to Regulatory Change?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1434

References

  • Abbott KW, Levi-faur D, Snidal D (2017) Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 670(1):14–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldridge TT, Audretsch D (2011) The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 40(8):1058–1067.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Google Scholar
  • Armanios D (2012) Sustainable development as a community of practice: Insights from rural water projects in Egypt. Sustainable Development 20(1):42–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armanios D, Lanahan L, Yu D (2020) Varieties of local government experimentation: U.S. state-led technology-based economic development policies, 2000–2015. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(2):266–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armanios DE, Eesley CE, Li JZ, Eisenhardt KM (2017) How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1373–1390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
  • Barnett SM, Ceci SJ (2002) When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psych. Bull. 128(4):612–637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: Toward a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):65–107.Google Scholar
  • Becker HS (1982) Art Worlds (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian AL (2001) “Old economy” inputs for “new economy” outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Indust. Corporate Change 10(4):835–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz LW, Gómez C, Spencer JW (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad. Management J. 43(5):994–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D (1992) Using regional variation in wages to measure the effects of the federal minimum-wage. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 46(1):22–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S-J, Wu B (2014) Institutional barriers and industry dynamics. Strategic Management J. 35(8):1103–1123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen AH, Patton D, Kenney M (2016) University technology transfer in China: A literature review and taxonomy. J. Tech. Transfer 41(5):891–929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J, Lu Y, Tsai T (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship in building an environmental protection system for the People’s Republic of China. Organ. Stud. 28(7):1013–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creed WED, DeJordy R, Lok J (2010) Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1336–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. Zucker LG, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA), 3–21.Google Scholar
  • Djankov S, McLiesh C, Ramalho RM (2006) Regulation and growth. Econom. Lett. 92(3):395–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Dowd TJ (1997) How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):501–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donato R (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Lantolf JP, Appel G, eds. Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (Ablex Publishing Corporation, Westport, CT), 33–56.Google Scholar
  • Dutt N, Hawn O, Vidal E, Chatterji A, McGahan A, Mitchell W (2016) How open system intermediaries fill voids in market-based institutions: The case of business incubators in emerging markets. Acad. Management J. 59(3):818–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easterly W (2001) The lost decades: Developing countries’ stagnation in spite of policy reform 1980-1998. J. Econom. Growth 6(2):135–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eberhart RN, Armanios DE (2021) Certification relics: Entrepreneurship amidst discontinued certifications. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eberhart R, Eesley C (2018) The dark side of institutional intermediaries: Junior stock exchanges and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2643–2665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eberhart RN, Eesley CE, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth. Organ. Sci. 28(1):93–112.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley C (2016) Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1290–1306.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley CE, Li JB, Yang D (2016) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley C, Eberhart R, Skousen BR, Cheng JLC (2018) Institutions and entrepreneurial activity: The interactive influence of misaligned formal and informal institutions. Strategy Sci. 3(2):393–407.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Evans P (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N (1997) Social skill and institutional theory. Amer. Behav. Sci. 40(4):397–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flores CA, Flores-Lagunes A, Gonzalez A, Neumann TC (2012) Estimating the effects of length of exposure to instruction in a training program: The case of Job Corps. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(1):153–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gang F, Ma G, Wang X (2018) Marketisation in China from 1997 to 2014: Achievements and contribution to growth. Garnaut R, Song L, Cai F, eds. China's 40 Years of Reform and Development: 1978-2018 (Australian National University Press, Acton, Australian Capital Territory), 257–269.Google Scholar
  • Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (1993) Changing competitive dynamics in network industries—An exploration of Sun Microsystems open systems strategy. Strategic Management J. 14(5):351–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Rappa MA (1994) A sociocognitive model of technology evolution—The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. 45(1):196–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroski PA, Mata J, Portugal P (2010) Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategic Management J. 31(5):510–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goedhuys M, Sleuwaegen L (2000) Entrepreneurship and growth of entrepreneurial firms in Cote d’Ivoire. J. Development Stud. 36(3):123–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Acad. Management J. 49(1):27–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR, Pozner J-E, Rao H (2006) Vox populi: Resource partitioning, organizational proliferation, and the cultural impact of the insurgent microradio movement. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(3):802–837.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimaldi R, Kenney M, Siegel DS, Wright M (2011) 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 40(8):1045–1057.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guston DH (1999) Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Soc. Stud. Sci. 29(1):87–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall PA, Soskice DW (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall PA, Thelen K (2009) Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-economic Rev. 7(1):7–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayne C, Vance M (2019) Information intermediary or de facto standard setter? Field evidence on the indirect and direct influence of proxy advisors. J. Accounting Res. 57(4):969–1011.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(1):119–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrigel G (2010) Manufacturing Possibilities: Creative Action and Industrial Recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt MA, Tihanyi L, Miller T, Connelly B (2006) International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 32(6):831–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong W (2008) Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004. Res. Policy 37(4):580–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howells J (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res. Policy 35(5):715–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH, Roberts EB, Eesley CE (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Res. Policy 36(5):768–788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isserman AM (1977) Location quotient approach to estimating regional economic impacts. J. Amer. Inst. Planners 43(1):33–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(5):957–970.Google Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods—Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenney M, Patton D (2009) Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model. Res. Policy 38(9):1407–1422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenney M, Breznitz D, Murphree M (2013) Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries. Res. Policy 42(2):391–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr WR, Nanda R (2009) Democratizing entry: Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 94(1):124–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klapper L, Amit R, Guillén MF (2010) Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Lerner J, Schoar A, eds. International Differences in Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 129–158.Google Scholar
  • Klapper L, Laeven L, Rajan R (2006) Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 82(3):591–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S (2009) Spinoffs: A review and synthesis. Eur. Management Rev. 6(3):159–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krugman PR (1995) Development, Geography, and Economic Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lanahan L, Armanios D (2018) Does more certification always benefit a venture? Organ. Sci. 29(5):931–947.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leblebici H, Salancik GR, Copay A, King T (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields—An organizational history of the United States radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J, Cho J (2005) Consumers’ use of information intermediaries and the impact on their information search behavior in the financial market. J. Consumer Affairs 39(1):95–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):147–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J (2009) Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed–And What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li HY, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhou L-A, Zhang W (2012) Returnee vs. locals: Who performs better in China’s technology entrepreneurship? Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):257–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin JY (2012) New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development (World Bank, Washington, DC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Link AN, Siegel DS, Van Fleet DD (2011) Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at U.S. National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Res. Policy 40(8):1094–1099.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Zhi T (2010) China is catching up in science and innovation: The experience of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Sci. Public Policy 37(5):331–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke RM (1995) Remaking the Italian Economy (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Logue D, Grimes M (2019) Platforms for the people: Enabling civic crowdfunding through the cultivation of institutional infrastructure. Strategic Management J.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2001) Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):29–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Crumley ET (2007) New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organ. Stud. 28(7):993–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maguire S, Hardy C, Lawrence TB (2004) Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J. 47(5):657–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mair J, Marti I, Ventresca MJ (2012) Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Acad. Management J. 55(4):819–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mair J, Wolf M, Seelos C (2016) Scaffolding: A process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Acad. Management J. 59(6):2021–2044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Qiao K (2020) Waking from Mao’s dream: Communist ideological imprinting and the internationalization of entrepreneurial ventures in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):795–830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Raynard M (2015) Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):291–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzucato M (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (Anthem Press, London).Google Scholar
  • McDermott GA, Corredoira RA, Kruse G (2009) Public-private institutions as catalysts of upgrading in emerging market societies. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1270–1296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B, Zaheer A (2004) Architects of trust: The role of network facilitators in geographical clusters. Cook KS, Kramer RM, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 189–213.Google Scholar
  • Meyer BD (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13(2):151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michelson E (2007) Lawyers, political embeddedness, and institutional continuity in China’s transition from socialism. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(2):352–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulton BR (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev. Econom. Statist. 72(2):334–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nee V (1992) Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology—Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Popp A (2000) “Swamped in information but starved of data”: Information and intermediaries in clothing supply chains. Supply Chain Management 5(3):151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW, Packalen K, Whittington K (2012) Organizational and institutional genesis: The emergence of high-tech clusters in the life sciences. Padgett JF, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 379–433.Google Scholar
  • Raffaelli R, Glynn MA (2014) Turnkey or tailored? Relational pluralism, institutional complexity, and the organizational adoption of more or less customized practices. Acad. Management J. 57(2):541–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 16(4):691–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Safford S (2009) Why the Garden Club Couldn’t Save Youngstown: The Transformation of the Rust Belt (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Saxenian A (1996) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider M, Scholz J, Lubell M, Mindruta D, Edwardsen M (2003) Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. Amer. J. Political Sci. 47(1):143–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):270–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel DS, Veugelers R, Wright M (2007) Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 23(4):640–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Haveman H, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer JW (2001) How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States–Japan comparison. Acad. Management J. 44(2):432–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stark D (1996) Recombinant property in east European capitalism. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(4):993–1027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms.Res. Policy 32(2):229–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutter C, Webb JW, Kistruck G, Ketchen DJ Jr, Ireland RD (2017) Transitioning entrepreneurs from informal to formal markets. J. Bus. Venturing 32(4):420–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suttmeier RP, Cao C, Simon DF (2006a) China’s innovation challenge and the remaking of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Innovations 1(3):78–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suttmeier RP, Cao C, Simon DF (2006b) Priorities and funding—“Knowledge innovation” and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Sci. 312(5770):58–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JP (2009) Using local labor market data to re-examine the employment effects of the minimum wage. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 62(3):343–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toole AA, Czarnitzki D (2009) Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: The case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program. Management Sci. 55(1):101–114.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walcott SM (2003) Chinese Science and Technology Industrial Parks (Ashgate, Burlington, VT).Google Scholar
  • Wang D (2015) Activating cross-border brokerage: Interorganizational knowledge transfer through skilled return migration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):133–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations—Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. Teece DJ, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Harper & Row, New York), 159–184.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2003) Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):133–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright M, Birley S, Mosey S (2004) Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. J. Tech. Transfer 29(3–4):235–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. 38(2):341–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Li HY (2010) Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management J. 31(1):88–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Y (2003) Analyzing the state of cooperation between the Chinese Academy of Sciences and provincial and municipal governments and enterprises (中国科学院与省市, 企业合作情况的分析). China Sci. Tech. Forum (中国科技论坛) 5:73–75,83.Google Scholar
  • Zilber TB (2002) Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Acad. Management J. 45(1):234–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.