Watchers, Watched, and Watching in the Digital Age: Reconceptualization of Information Technology Monitoring as Complex Action Nets

References

• Adelstein J, Clegg S (2015) Code of ethics: A stratified vehicle for compliance. J. Bus. Ethics 138:53–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Telang R, Padman R, Adler-Milstein J (2016) The impact of privacy regulation and technology incentives: The case of health information exchanges. Management Sci. 62(4):1042–1063.Link, Google Scholar
• Ajunwa I, Crawford K, Schultz J (2017) Limitless worker surveillance. California Law Rev. 105:735–776.Google Scholar
• Albrechtslund A (2008) Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday 13(3):Article 7.Google Scholar
• Allen MW, Coopman SJ, Hart JL, Walker KL (2007) Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Comm. Quart. 21(2):172–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allmer T (2011) Critical surveillance studies in the information society. Comm. Capitalism Critique 9(2):566–592.Google Scholar
• Alvarez R (2008) Examining technology, structure and identity during an enterprise system implementation. Inform. Systems J. 18(2):203–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ameripour A, Nicholson B, Newman M (2010) Conviviality of internet social networks: An exploratory study of internet campaigns in Iran. J. Inform. Tech. 25(2):244–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anandarajan M (2002) Profiling web usage in the workplace: A behavior-based artificial intelligence approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):243–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Baskerville RL, Kaul M (2017) Information security control theory: Achieving a sustainable reconciliation between sharing and protecting the privacy of information. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(4):1082–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Dellarocas C, Godes D (2013) Introduction to the special issue—Social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):3–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Astor PJ, Adam MTP, Jerčić P, Schaaff K, Weinhardt C (2013) Integrating biosignals into information systems: A neuroIS tool for improving emotion regulation. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(3):247–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayyagari R (2011) Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quart. 35(4):831–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball K (2009) Exposure: Exploring the subject of surveillance. Inform. Comm. Soc. 12(5):639–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball K, Wilson DC (2000) Power, control and computer-based performance monitoring: Repertoires, resistance and subjectivities. Organ. Stud. 21(3):539–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barad K (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baudrillard J (2006) Simulacra and Simulation (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Baudrillard J (2007) Forget Foucault (Semiotext(e), Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2019) Dealing with digital traces: Understanding protective behaviors on mobile devices. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(1):34–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Xu H (2015) The role of information systems research in shaping the future of information privacy. Inform. Systems J. 25(6):573–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belot M, Schröder M (2016) The spillover effects of monitoring: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(1):37–45.Link, Google Scholar
• Benaroch M, Chernobai A (2017) Operational IT failures, IT value destruction, and board-level IT governance changes. MIS Quart. 41(3):729–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein E (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogard W (1996) The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Boyne R (2000) Post-panopticism. Econom. Soc. 29(2):285–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brivot M, Gendron Y (2011) Beyond panopticism: on the ramifications of surveillance in a contemporary professional setting. Account. Organ. Soc. 36(3):135–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brocklehurst M (2001) Power, identity and new technology homework: Implications for 'new forms' of organizing. Organ. Stud. 22(3):445–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browne R (2020) Why coronavirus contact-tracing apps aren’t yet the ‘game changer’ authorities hoped they’d be. CNBC News (July 3), https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/03/why-coronavirus-contact-tracing-apps-havent-been-a-game-changer.html.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Geva T, Reichman S (2016) Crowd-squared: Amplifying the predictive power of search trend data. MIS Quart. 40(4):941–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhl HU, Mueller G (2010) The “transparent citizen” in web 2.0. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 2(4):203–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Busvine D, Rinke A (2020) Germany flips to Apple-Google approach on smartphone contact tracing. Reuters (April 26), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-tech/germany-flips-to-apple-google-approach-on-smartphone-contact-tracing-idUSKCN22807J.Google Scholar
• Clegg SR (1989) Frameworks of Power (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg S, Dunkerley D (2013) Organization, Class and Control (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg SR, Courpasson D, Phillips N (2006) Power and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Clegg S, Cunha MP, Rego A (2012) The theory and practice of utopia in a total institution: The pineapple panopticon. Organ. Stud. 33(12):1735–1757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg SR, Schweitzer J, van Rijmen M (2019) The politics of openness. Seidl D, von Krogh G, Whittington R, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 307–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Wilson JS (2015) Family preferences concerning online privacy, data mining, and targeted ads: Regulatory implications. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(2):40–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantiou ID, Kallinikos J (2015) New games, new rules: Big data and the changing context of strategy. J. Inform. Tech. 30(1):44–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courpasson D (2000) Managerial strategies of domination. Power in soft bureaucracies. Organ. Stud. 21(1):141–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossler RE, Bélanger F (2019) Why would I use location-protective settings on my smartphone? Motivating protective behaviors and the existence of the privacy knowledge–belief gap. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):995–1006.Link, Google Scholar
• Crossler RE, Posey C (2017) Robbing Peter to pay Paul: Surrendering privacy for security’s sake in an identity ecosystem. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(7):487–515.Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ (1993) “How did they get my name?”: An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. 17(3):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B (2004) On time, space, and action nets. Organ. 11(6):773–791.Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Hovav A, Galletta D (2009) User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: A deterrence approach. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):79–98.Link, Google Scholar
• De Saulles M, Horner DS (2011) The portable panopticon: Morality and mobile technologies. J. Inform. Comm. Ethics Soc. 9(3):206–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deery S, Iverson R, Walsh J (2002) Work relationships in telephone call centres: Understanding emotional exhaustion and employee withdrawal. J. Management Stud. 39(4):471–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Degli Esposti S (2014) When big data meets dataveillance: The hidden side of analytics. Surveillance Soc. 12(2):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLanda M (1991) War in the Age of Intelligent Machines (Zone Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) Introduction: Rhizome. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 3–25.Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2005) Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):209–230.Link, Google Scholar
• Denyer D, Parry E, Flowers P (2011) “Social”, “Open” and “Participative”? Exploring personal experiences and organisational effects of Enterprise 2.0 use. Long Range Planning 44(5–6):375–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P, Mullen MR (2008) Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance—an empirical investigation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 17(3):214–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Bellotto M, Hart P, Russo V, Serra I, Colautti C (2006) Privacy calculus model in e-commerce—a study of Italy and the United States.Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(4):389–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong JQ, Wu W (2015) Business value of social media technologies: Evidence from online user innovation communities. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(2):113–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doolin B (2004) Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Inform. Systems J. 14(4):343–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• du Gay P (2004) Against ‘enterprise’ (but not against ‘enterprise’, for that would make no sense). Organ. 11(1):37–57.Google Scholar
• Dunkerly D (2013) The Foreman: Aspects of Task and Structure (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Ellerbrook A (2010) Empowerment: Analysing technologies of multiple variable visibility. Surveillance Soc. 8(2):200–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eslami M, Rickman A, Vaccaro K, Aleyasen A, Vuong A, Karahalios K, Sandvig C (2015) “I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her]”: Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems. (ACM, New York), 153–162.Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK).Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8(4):777–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault M (2003) Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. (Picador, New York).Google Scholar
• Fowler GA (2020) One of the first contact-tracing apps violates its own privacy policy. Washington Post (May 21), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/21/care19-dakota-privacy-coronavirus/.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Jain S, Tuertscher P (2008) Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organ. Stud. 29(3):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Sambamurthy V (2006) Emergent by design: Performance and transformation at Infosys Technologies. Organ. Sci. 17(2):277–286.Link, Google Scholar
• Gentry RJ, Shen W (2013) The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Strategic Management J. 34(1):121–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilliom J, Monahan T (2012) SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goranova ML, Priem RL, Ndofor HA, Trahms CA (2017) Is there a “dark side” to monitoring? Board and shareholder monitoring effects on M&A performance extremeness. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2285–2297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gozman D, Currie W (2014) The role of investment management systems in regulatory compliance: A post-financial crisis study of displacement mechanisms. J. Inform. Tech. 29(1):44–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RA, Higgins CA (1991) The impact of computerized performance monitoring on service work: Testing a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 2(2):116–142.Link, Google Scholar
• Guillemette MG, Fontaine I, Caron C (2009) A hybrid tracking system of human resources: A case study in a Canadian university. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(15):255–268.Google Scholar
• Haggerty KD (2006) Tear down the walls: on demolishing the panopticon. Lyon D, ed. Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond (Willan Publishing, Cullompton, UK), 23–45.Google Scholar
• Haggerty K, Ericson R (2000) The surveillant assemblage. British J. Sociol. 51(4):605–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harju AA, Huovinen A (2015) Fashionably voluptuous: Normative femininity and resistant performative tactics in fatshion blogs. J. Marketing Management 31(15–16):1602–1625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haskins C (2020) Apple and Google's coronavirus tech won’t actually do contact tracing. Here’s why exposure notification is different. BuzzFeed News (May 20), https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/carolinehaskins1/what-are-exposure-notifications-contact-tracing-how-are.Google Scholar
• Howard P, Woolley SC (2016) Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents—introduction. Internat. J. Comm. 10:4882–4890.Google Scholar
• Huang J, Baptista J, Newell S (2015) Communicational ambidexterity as a new capability to manage social media communication within organizations. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(2):49–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iedema R, Rhodes C (2010) The undecided space of ethics in organizational surveillance. Organ. Stud. 31(2):199–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson K (2006) The embedded panopticon: Visibility issues of remote diagnostics surveillance. Scandinavian J. Inform. Systems 18(2):1–22.Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2010) A theory of digital objects. First Monday 15(6):Article 2.Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quart. 37(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karanasios S, Allen D (2013) ICT for development in the context of the closure of Chernobyl nuclear power plant: An activity theory perspective. Inform. Systems J. 23(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karwatzki S, Dytynko O, Trenz M, Veit D (2017a) Beyond the personalization–privacy paradox: Privacy valuation, transparency features, and service personalization. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(2):369–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karwatzki S, Trenz M, Tuunainen V, Veit D (2017b) Adverse consequences of access to individuals’ information: An analysis of perceptions and the scope of organisational influence. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 26(6):688–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny K (2019) Whistleblowing: Toward a New Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Kettinger WJ (2004) Informating the clan: Controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes. MIS Quart. 28(3):363–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kordzadeh N, Warren J (2017) Communicating personal health information in virtual health communities: An integration of privacy calculus model and affective commitment. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(1):45–81.Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Graepel T (2013) Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(15):5802–5805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kubitschko S (2015) The role of hackers in countering surveillance and promoting democracy. Media Comm. 3(2):77–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A, Isaac H, Kalika M (2014) Mobile information systems and organisational control: Beyond the panopticon metaphor? Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(5):543–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D (2017) Facebook team working on brain-powered technology. BBC News (April 19), https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39648788.Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levay C, Waks C (2009) Professions and the pursuit of transparency in healthcare: Two cases of soft autonomy. Organ. Stud. 30(5):509–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X-B, Qin J (2017) Anonymizing and sharing medical text records. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):332–352.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Sun SX, Chen K, Fung T, Wang H (2015) Design theory for market surveillance systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(2):278–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang F, Das V, Kostyuk N, Hussain MM (2018) Constructing a data‐driven society: China’s social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy Internet 10(4):415–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindberg K, Czarniawska B (2006) Knotting the action net, or organizing between organizations. Scandinavian J. Management 22(4):292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long CP, Bendersky C, Morrill C (2011) Fairness monitoring: Linking managerial controls and fairness judgments in organizations. Acad. Management J. 54(5):1045–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran J (2019) Ministers could be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act over Huawei 5G leak. Engrg. Tech. (April 26), https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2019/04/ministers-could-be-prosecuted-under-the-official-secrets-act-over-huawei-5g-leak/.Google Scholar
• Lyon D (1994) The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Lyon D (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).Google Scholar
• Lyon D (2006) 9/11, synopticon, and scopophilia: Watching and being watched. Haggerty KD, Ericson RV, eds. The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility (University of Toronto Press, Toronto), 35–54.Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland R (2016) Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inform. Systems J. 26(1):47–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Toward an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 22(4):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann S, Ferenbok J (2013) New media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance-dominated world. Surveillance Soc. 11(1/2):18–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manovich L (2001) The Language of New Media (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Marsden JR, Tung YA (1999) The use of information system technology to develop tests on insider trading and asymmetric information. Management Sci. 45(8):1025–1040.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin AK, Van Brakel RE, Bernhard DJ (2009) Understanding resistance to digital surveillance: Toward a multi-disciplinary, multi-actor framework. Surveillance Soc. 6(3):213–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwick AE (2014) How your data are being deeply mined. New York Review of Books (January 9), https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/01/09/how-your-data-are-being-deeply-mined/.Google Scholar
• Marx GT (2002) What’s new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance Soc. 1(1):9–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathiesen T (1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoret. Criminology 1(2):215–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K (2013) Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston).Google Scholar
• Mayo E (1975) The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.Link, Google Scholar
• McCurry J (2020) Test, trace, contain: how South Korea flattened its coronavirus curve. The Guardian (April 22), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/23/test-trace-contain-how-south-korea-flattened-its-coronavirus-curve.Google Scholar
• Metcalf J (2018) Facebook may stop the data leaks, but it’s too late: Cambridge Analytica’s models live on. MIT Technology Review (April 9), https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/04/09/104516/facebook-may-stop-the-data-leaks-but-its-too-late-cambridge-analyticas-models-live-on/.Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Tucker C (2013) Active social media management: The case of healthcare. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):52–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Muldoon J (2017) The Hawthorne studies: an analysis of critical perspectives, 1936–1958. J. Management Hist. 23(1):74–94.Google Scholar
• Munro I (2019) An interview with Chelsea Manning’s lawyer: Nancy Hollander on human rights and the protection of whistleblowers. Organ. 26(2):276–290.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G (2014) Integration and productivity: Satellite-tracked evidence. Management Sci. 60(7):1698–1718.Link, Google Scholar
• Newell S, Marabelli M (2015) Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification’. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Harrow R (2006) No Place to Hide (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1991) Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting Management Information Tech. 1(1):9–42.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1977) The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(1):95–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2011) State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quart. 35(4):977–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pecora VP (2002) The culture of surveillance. Qualitative Sociol. 25(3):345–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ (2014) Managing contracts for fairness in buyer–supplier exchanges. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1508–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poster M (1993) Politics, Theory, and Contemporary Culture (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Poster M (1996) Databases as discourse; or, electronic interpellations. Lyon D, Zureik E, eds. Computers, Surveillance, and Privacy (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 175–192.Google Scholar
• Rhodes RA (2007) Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organ. Stud. 28(8):1243–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riad S (2005) The power of ‘organizational culture’ as a discursive formation in merger integration. Organ. Stud. 26(10):1529–1554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rizq R (2013) States of abjection. Organ. Stud. 34(9):1277–1297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy D (1959) “Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutherford MA, Buchholtz AK, Brown JA (2007) Examining the relationships between monitoring and incentives in corporate governance. J. Management Stud. 44(3):414–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott SV, Orlikowski WJ (2014) Entanglements in practice: Performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quart. 38(3):873–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seaman JB, Erlen JA (2015) Workarounds in the workplace: A second look. Orthopaedic Nursing 34(4):235–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servick K (2020) COVID-19 contact tracing apps are coming to a phone near you. How will we know whether they work? Science (May 21), https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/countries-around-world-are-rolling-out-contact-tracing-apps-contain-coronavirus-how.Google Scholar
• Sewell G (1998) The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):397–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sewell G, Barker J (2006) Coercion vs. care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):934–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (2011) I’ve got a theory paper—do you? Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1312–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Gupta N, Delery JE (2000) Empirical organizational-level examinations of agency and collaborative predictions of performance-contingent compensation. Strategic Management J. 21(5):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silva S (2020) Coronavirus: How map hacks and buttocks helped Taiwan fight Covid-19. BBC News (June 6), https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52883838.Google Scholar
• Silva L, Backhouse J (2003) The circuits-of-power framework for studying power in institutionalization of information system. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 4(6):294–336.Google Scholar
• Silverman D (2019) Interpreting Qualitative Data (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Singer N (2020) Virus-tracing apps are rife with problems. Governments are rushing to fix them. New York Times (July 8), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/virus-tracing-apps-privacy.html.Google Scholar
• Singh R, Mathiassen L, Stachura ME, Astapova EV (2011) Dynamic capabilities in home health: IT-enabled transformation of post-acute care. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(2):163–188.Google Scholar
• Spiekermann S, Korunovska J (2017) Toward a value theory for personal data. J. Inform. Tech. 32(1):62–84 (Palgrave Macmillan).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann D, Milkman KL (2017) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1663–1685.Link, Google Scholar
• Stahl BC, Doherty NF, Shaw M (2012) Information security policies in the UK healthcare sector: A critical evaluation. Inform. Systems J. 22(1):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanko TL, Beckman CM (2015) Watching you watching me: Boundary control and capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Acad. Management J. 58(3):712–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statt N (2020) ACLU sues facial recognition firm Clearview AI, calling it a ‘nightmare scenario’ for privacy. The Verge (May 28), https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/28/21273388/aclu-clearview-ai-lawsuit-facial-recognition-database-illinois-biometric-laws.Google Scholar
• Tas J, Kimpen J (2020) Health systems are in need of radical change; virtual care will lead the way. MIT Technology Review (April 30), https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/04/30/1000818/health-systems-are-in-need-of-radical-change-virtual-care-will-lead-the-way/.Google Scholar
• Trahair R (2001) George Elton Mayo. Witzel M, ed. Biographical Dictionary of Management (Thoemmes, Bristol, UK), 326.Google Scholar
• Tung A, Marsden JR (2000) Trading volumes with and without private information: A study using computerized market experiments. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(1):31–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turow J (2011) The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Twyman NW, Lowry PB, Burgoon JK, Nunamaker JF (2014) Autonomous scientifically controlled screening systems for detecting information purposely concealed by individuals. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(3):106–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentino-DeVries J (2020) F.C.C. to fine cellphone carriers for selling customers’ locations. New York Times (February 27), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/technology/fcc-location-data.html.Google Scholar
• Van Dijck J (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance Soc. 12(2):197–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vance A, Lowry PB, Eggett D (2013) Using accountability to reduce access policy violations in information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(4):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vance A, Lowry PB, Egget D (2015) Increasing accountability through user interface design artifacts: A new approach to addressing the problem of access-policy violations. MIS Quart. 39(2):345–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieira da Cunha J (2013) A dramaturgical model of the production of performance data. MIS Quart. 37(3):723–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieira da Cunha J, Carugati A (2009) Information technology and the first-line manager's dilemma: Lessons from an ethnographic study. Newell S, Whitley EA, Pouloudi N, Wareham J, Mathiassen L, eds. Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems, ECIS 2009, Verona, Italy, 2834–2845.Google Scholar
• Visser LM, Bleijenbergh IL, Benschop YWM, van Riel ACR (2018) Prying eyes: A dramaturgical approach to professional surveillance. J. Management Stud. 55(4):703–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walin M (2020) Traffic data, route planning, and ETA: How Google Maps predicts travel time. Accessed February 17, 2021, https://www.verizonconnect.com/resources/article/google-maps-travel-time/.Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Bjørn-Andersen N, Neergaard P (1998) Reinterpreting the demise of hierarchy: A case study in information technology, empowerment and incomplete contracts. Inform. Systems J. 8(4):257–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warkentin M, Goel S, Menard P (2017) Shared benefits and information privacy: What determines smart meter technology adoption? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(11):758–786.Google Scholar
• Weber M (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williams T (1996) Government regulation through voluntary cooperation: A follow-up study of the strategic impact of information technology. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 5(2):149–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood D (2002) Foucault and panopticism revisited. Surveillance Soc. 1(3):234–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley SC, Howard PN (2016) Automation, algorithms, and politics: Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents—introduction. Internat. J. Comm. 10:4882–4890.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo H-H, Tan BCY, Agarwal R (2009) The role of push–pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):135–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J (1993) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Venkatesh V (2013) Explaining employee job performance: The role of online and offline workplace communication networks. MIS Quart. 37(3):695–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmer M (2008) The gaze of the perfect search engine: Google as an infrastructure of dataveillance. Spink A, Zimmer M, eds. Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Springer, Berlin), 77–99.Google Scholar
• Zittrain J (2008) The Future of the Internet—and How to Stop It (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2015) Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inform. Tech. 30(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2016) The secrets of surveillance capitalism. Frankfurter Allgemeine (March 5), https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/shoshana-zuboff-secrets-of-surveillance-capitalism-14103616.html.Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power (PublicAffairs, New York).Google Scholar