Anchored Differentiation: The Role of Temporal Distance in the Comparison and Evaluation of New Product Designs

References

• Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Bjork RA, Bjork EL (1994) Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J. Experiment. Psych. Learning Memory Cognition 20(5):1063–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) “Who are you? … I really wanna know”: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):161–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Angus RW (2019) Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1219–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellezza S, Gino F, Keinan A (2014) The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. J. Consumer Res. 41(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg JM (2016) Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):433–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2008) The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Res. Policy 37(5):932–945.Google Scholar
• Bilir LK (2014) Patent laws, product life-cycle lengths, and multinational activity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(7):1979–2013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch P (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing 59(3):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Allison PD (2014) Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):258–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Porac JF, Thomas H (2017) Categories and competition. Strategic Management J. 38:64–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan C, Berger J, Van Boven L (2012) Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. J. Consumer Res. 39(3):561–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TH, Mihm J, Sosa ME (2018) On styles in product design: An analysis of US design patents. Management Sci. 64(3):1230–1249.Link, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Nag M, Blei D (2013) Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics 41(6):570–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi B (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenman M (2013) Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):332–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Yogev T, Lee Y, Hedström P (2016) The art of representation: How audience-specific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field. Acad. Management J. 59(1):113–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• Godart F (2012) Unveiling Fashion: Business Culture, and Identity in the Most Glamorous Industry (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans R (2019) What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous vs. heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management J. (40):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O (2016) Turning back the clock in baseball: The increased prominence of extrinsic rewards and demand for authenticity. Organ. Sci. 27(4):929–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hebdige D (1979) Subculture: The Meaning of Style (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Heffetz O (2011) A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Rev. Econom. Statist. XCIII(4):1101–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemphill CS, Suk J (2009) The law, culture, and economics of fashion. Stanford Law Rev. 61(5):1147–1199.Google Scholar
• Hoegg J, Alba JW (2011) Seeing is believing (too much): The influence of product form on perceptions of functional performance. J. Production Innovation Management 28(3):346–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irmak C, Vallen B, Sen S (2010) You like what I like, but I don’t like what you like: Uniqueness motivations in product preferences. J. Consumer Res. 37(3):443–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H, Kim BK, Barnett ML, Pollock TG, eds. (2012) Meeting Expectations: A Role-Theoretic Perspective on Reputation (Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation, Oxford, UK), 141–159.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K, Butter R (2007) Semantics: Meanings and contexts of artifacts. Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P, eds. Production Exp. (Elsevier, New York), 353–376.Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich K (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Landwehr JR, Labroo AA, Herrmann A (2011) Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Sci. 30(3):416–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Landwehr JR, Wentzel D, Herrmann A (2013) Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypicai designs at different stages of exposure. J. Marketing 77(5):92–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li KJ, Chen HA, Balachander S (2017) The effects of products’ aesthetic design on demand and marketing-mix effectiveness: The role of segment prototypicality and brand consistency. J. Marketing 81(1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo JYC, Kennedy MT (2015) Approval in nanotechnology patents: Micro and macro factors that affect reactions to category blending. Organ. Sci. 26(1):119–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Lynn M, Harris J (1997) The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psych. Marketing 14(6):601–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maeda J (2015) Have designers killed the engineering star? Interview by Emily Chang. Bloomsburg Business, retrieved June 7, 2015, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-05-19/the-growing-importance-of-designers-in-silicon-valley.Google Scholar
• Mason W, Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H, Pillai RR (1999) Industry clockspeed: Measurement and operational implications. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 1(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Micheli P, Gemser G (2016) Signaling strategies for innovative design: A study on design tradition and expert attention. J. Production Innovation Management 33(5):613–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molotch H (2003) Where Stuff Comes From: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers and Many Other Things Come to Be as They Are (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Negro G, Leung MD (2013) “Actual” and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W (1995) Design innovation and fashion cycles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):771–792.Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: how ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. Rosch E, Lloyd BB, eds. Cogn. Categ. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hilsdale, NJ), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organization (Routledge, New York), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Sullivan LH (1896) The tall office building artistically considered. Lippincott’s Mag. 57(3):406.Google Scholar
• The Economist (2012) Apple v Samsung: iPhone, uCopy, iSue. The Economist (September 1), https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/09/01/iphone-ucopy-isue.Google Scholar
• Tian KT, Bearden WO, Hunter GL (2001) Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. J. Consumer Res. 28(1):50–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (2011a) Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (2011b) Design is everything? J. Production Innovation Management 28(3):394–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• USPTO (2006) Design Patents (Chapter 1500). Man. Pat. Examining Proced (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA), 1501–1562.Google Scholar
• Vanhemert K (2015) Consulting giant McKinsey buys itself a top design firm. WIRED.com, Retrieved June 17, 2019, https://www.wired.com/2015/05/consulting-giant-mckinsey-bought-top-design-firm/.Google Scholar
• Veryzer RW, Hutchinson JW (1998) The influence of unity and prototypicality. J. Consumer Res. 24(4):374–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Singhal VR, Zhang GP (2016) Product design awards and the market value of the firm. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1038–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kashkooli K (2020) Stay true to your roots? Category distance, hierarchy, and the performance of new entrants in the music industry. Organ. Sci. 31(3):604–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38:93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Jennings PD, Lounsbury M (2018) Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organ. Sci. 29(4):558–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2016) Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. Pratt MG, et al. eds. Oxford Handb. Organ. identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 183–199.Google Scholar