Learning to Manage Breadth: Experience as Repetition and Adaptation

References

• Agarwal R, Helfat CE (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Hart S (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 5(1):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2013) Organizational learning curves: An overview. Argote L, ed. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer U.S., Boston), 1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian N (2011) New plant venture performance differences among incumbent, diversifying, and entrepreneurial firms: The impact of industry learning intensity. Management Sci. 57(3):549–565.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Ingram P (1998) Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1980. Management Sci. 44(7):996–1016.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1992) The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. Quart. J. Econom. 107(4):1137–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkard CL (2000) Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1034–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L, Dowell G, King AA (2012) Environmental capabilities and corporate strategy: Exploring acquisitions among US manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1053–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L, Dutt N, Mitchell W (2019) Knowledge sources and operational problems: Less now, more later. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1030–1053.Link, Google Scholar
• Christmann P (2000) Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Acad. Management J. 43(4):663–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark JR, Kuppuswamy V, Staats BR (2018) Goal relatedness and learning: Evidence from hospitals. Organ. Sci. 29(1):100–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Siggelkow N (2009) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):661–676.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• de Marchi S, Hamilton J (2006) Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. J. Risk Uncertainity 32:57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Kim TY, Carroll GR (2002) The evolution of organizational niches: U.S. automobile manufacturers, 1885–1981. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):233–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Dowell GWS, Toffel MW (2013) How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1209–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowell G (2006) Product line strategies of new entrants in an established industry: Evidence from the U.S. bicycle industry. Strategic Management J. 27(10):959–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N (2010) Vicarious learning in the presence of managerial bias. Eur. Management Rev. 7(2):132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N (2013) Identifying search space. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Joseph J (2019) Regulatory uncertainty, corporate structure, and strategic agendas: Evidence from the U.S. renewable electricity industry. Acad. Management J. 62(3):800–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, King AA (2014) Waste reduction The judgment of garbage: End-of-pipe treatment and waste reduction. Management Sci. 60(7):1812–1828.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Mitchell W (2020) Searching for knowledge in response to proximate and remote problem sources: Evidence from the U.S. renewable electricity industry. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1412–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(2):128–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012) Falling flat failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):47–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Retrieved March 25, 2012, http://www.epa.gov/ems/.Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Garicano L (2000) Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. 108(5):874–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Wu Y (2012) Knowledge, communication, and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1382–1397.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, Agarwal R, Gopal A (2016) The when and why of abandonment: The role of organizational differences in medical technology life cycles. Management Sci. 63(9):2948–2966.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1999) The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1989) Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Res. Policy 18(2):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain A (2013) Learning by doing and the locus of innovative capability in biotechnology research. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1683–1700.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Gaur V, Raman A (2010) Do inventory and gross margin data improve sales forecasts for US public retailers? Management Sci. 56(9):1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2001) Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production Oper. Management 10(3):244–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1991) Country capabilities and the permeability of borders. Strategic Management J. 12(S1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampert CM, Semadeni M (2010) Search breadth and the cost of search. Acad. Management Annual Meeting Proc. 2010(1):1–6.Google Scholar
• Lapré MA, Mukherjee AS, Wassenhove LNV (2000) Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. 46:597–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M (2018) Taking stock of the ability to change: The effect of prior experience. Organ. Sci. 29(3):489–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M (2020) Replication using templates: Does the unit learn from itself, the template, or both? Strategic Management J. 41(11):1955–1982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Madsen TL (2009) Unbundling competitive heterogeneity: Incentive structures and capability influences on technological innovation. Strategic Management J. 30(7):711–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A (2005) Organization of knowledge and innovation: The case of Finnish business services. Indust. Innovation 12(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Posen HE (2007) Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):586–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP, Sethuraman K, Fisher ML (1996) Product variety and manufacturing performance: Evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study. Management Sci. 42(3):350–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Boerner C (2012) Technological development at the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in drug development. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1016–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel P, Pavitt K (1997) The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Res. Policy 26(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pil FK, Cohen SK (2006) Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Acad. Management J. 31(4):995–1011.Google Scholar
• Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Rawley E (2010) Diversification, coordination costs, and organizational rigidity: Evidence from. Microdata. Strat. Management J. 31:873–891.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rockart SF, Dutt N (2015) The rate and potential of capability development trajectories. Strategic Management J. 36(1):53–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Stan M, Vermeulen F (2012) Selection at the gate: Difficult cases, spillovers, and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):796–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1982) Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Patel PC (2017) In search of process innovations the role of search depth, search breadth, and the industry environment. J. Management 43(5):1421–1446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vivero RL (2002) The impact of process innovations on firm’s productivity growth: The case of Spain. Appl. Econom. 34(8):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright TP (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J. Aeronautical Sci. 3(4):122–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM, Wan X (2017) Product variety, sourcing complexity, and the bottleneck of coordination. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1569–1587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar