Mitigating Gig and Remote Worker Misconduct: Evidence from a Real Effort Experiment

References

• Aiello J (1993) Computer-based work monitoring—Electronic surveillance and its effects. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(7):499–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiello JR, Svec CM (1993) Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(7):537–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amos E, Weathington B (2008) An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes. J. Psych. 142(6):615–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E (1985) The salesperson as outside agent of employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. 4(3):234–254.Link, Google Scholar
• Arthur W Jr, Bell ST, Villado AJ, Doverspike D (2006) The use of person–organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion–related validity. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):786–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian P, Bennett VM, Pierce L (2017) The wages of dishonesty: The supply of cheating under high-powered incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 137:428–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Wrzesniewski A, Weisenfeld BM (2012) Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organ. Sci. 23(3):743–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76(2):169–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett VM, Pierce L, Snyder JA, Toffel MW (2013) Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Sci. 59(8):1725–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Siegel P (1996) Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. Kramer RM, Tyler T, eds. Trust in Organisations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 390–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021a) Getting gig workers to do more by doing good: Field experimental evidence from online platform labor marketplaces. Organ. Environ. 34(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021b) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Ostler J (2020) Differences in consumer-benefiting misconduct by nonprofit, for-profit, and public organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. In press.Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Mamer J, Snyder J (2018) Pro bono as a human capital learning and screening mechanism: Evidence from law firms. Strategic Management J. 39(11):2899–2920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, DeRue DS (2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J. Appl. Psych. 87(5):875–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2013) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen CX, Sandino T (2012) Can wages buy honesty? The relationship between relative wages and employee theft. J. Accounting Res. 50(4):967–1000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (1996) Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dis-honesty. Messick DM, Tenbrunsel AE, eds. Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics (Russell Sage, New York), 44–58.Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD, Webber SS (2005) Relationships among geographic dispersion, team processes, and effectiveness in software development work teams. J. Bus. Res. 58(6):758–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Horatius N, Raman A (2008) Inventory record inaccuracy: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 54(4):627–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Treviño LK, Burris ER, Andiappan M (2007) Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):993–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickens WT, Katz LF, Lang K, Summers LH (1989) Employee crime and the monitoring puzzle. J. Labor Econom. 7(3):331–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. 12(4):450–467.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubois D, Rucker DD, Galinsky AD (2015) Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(3):436–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan SP (2012) Incentives work: Getting teachers to come to school. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1241–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning D, Fetchenhauer D, Schlösser TM (2012) Trust as a social and emotional act: Noneconomic considerations in trust behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 33(3):686–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles R (1985) Transfer pricing as a problem of agency. Pratt J, Zeckhauser R, eds. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 151–186.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Larkin I (2014) Social comparisons and deception across workplace hierarchies: Field and experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 26(1):78–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Cable DM (2009) The value of value congruence. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):654–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1988) Agency and institutional explanations of compensation in retail sales. Acad. Management J. 31(3):488–511.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrin DL, Bligh MC, Kohles JC (2007) Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group Organ. Management 32(4):465–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Luo J (2017) Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Strategic Management J. 38(2):163–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory J, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2016) The effects of wage contracts on workplace misbehaviors: Evidence from a call center natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper 22342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Frank DH, Obloj T (2014) Firm-specific capital, organizational incentives, and agency costs: Evidence from retail banking.Google Scholar
• Frey B (1993) Does monitoring increase work effort? The rivalry with trust and loyalty. Econom. Inquiry 31(4):663–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pierce L (2009) Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psych. Sci. 20(9):1153–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pierce L (2010a) Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. J. Bus. Ethics 95(1):89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pierce L (2010b) Robin Hood under the hood: Wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1176–1194.Link, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Wiltermuth SS (2014) Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity. Psych. Sci. 25(4):973–981.Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1990) Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):561–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1993) Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 54(1):81–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):286–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2019) The status of workers and platforms in the sharing economy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (1979) Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory 20(2):231–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsh JB, Lu JG, Galinsky AD (2018) Moral utility theory: Understanding the motivation to behave (un)ethically. Res. Organ. Behav. 38:43–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland PJ, Cooper B, Hecker R (2015) Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace. Personality Rev. 44(1):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hölmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard TN (2000) The demand for monitoring technologies: The case of trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 115(2):533–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4):692–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaine S, Josserand E (2019) The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. J. Indust. Relations 61(4):479–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y (2007) The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. Management Inform. Systems. Quart. 31(4):783–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2017) The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 69:156–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Galo E, Reader JJ (2015) Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1508–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kokkodis M, Ipeirotis PG (2015) Reputation transferability in online labor markets. Management Sci. 62(6):1687–1706.Link, Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psych. 58(2):281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurland NB, Egan TD (1999) Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organ. Sci. 10(4):500–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Larkin I (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):199–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L (2015) Compensation and employee misconduct: the inseparability of productive and counterproductive behavior in firms. Palmer D, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R, eds. Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 270–304.Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) Incentive schemes, sorting and behavioral biases of employees: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 4(2):184–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Momeni F (2021) When corporate social responsibility backfires: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment. Management Sci. 67(1):8–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Litzky BE, Eddleston K, Kidder D (2006) The good, the bad, and the misguided: How managers inadvertently encourage deviant behaviors. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(1):91–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu JG, Brockner J, Vardi Y, Weitz E (2017) The dark side of experiencing job autonomy: Unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Psych. 73:222–234.Google Scholar
• Luo J, Kaul A, Seo H (2018) Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2591–2617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Murnighan J (2002) The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):534–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann S, Holdsworth L (2003) The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Tech. Work Employment 18(3):196–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meijerink J, Keegan A (2019) Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig economy: Toward a platform ecosystem perspective. J. Managerial Psych. 34(4):214–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulder LB, van Dijk E, De Cremer D, Wilke HAM (2006) Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(2):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KR (1993) Honesty in the Workplace (Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Nagin DS, Rebitzer JB, Sanders S, Taylor LJ (2002) Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):850–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2012) Incentive life-cycles learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):305–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olken BA (2007) Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J. Political Econom. 115(2):200–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (1998) Fiscal year ends and nonlinear incentive contracts: The effect on business seasonality. Quart. J. Econom. 113(1):149–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petriglieri G, Ashford SJ, Wrzesniewski A (2019) Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):124–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Balasubramanian P (2015) Behavioral field evidence on psychological and social factors in dishonesty and misconduct. Current Opinion Psych. 6:70–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snyder J (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54(11):1891–1903.Link, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snyder J (2015) Unethical demand and employee turnover. J. Bus. Ethics 131(4):853–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N (2013) From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective-takers unethical. Psych. Sci. 24(10):1986–1994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto J, Leana CR, Pil FK (2008) Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):685–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross S (1973) The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):134–139.Google Scholar
• Scholz T (2017) Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Shamir B, Salomon I (1985) Work-at-home and the quality of working life. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):455–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman TD (2012) Biting the Hand That Feeds: The Employee Theft Epidemic–New Perspectives, New Solutions, 1st ed. (Infinity Publishing, West Conshohocken, PA).Google Scholar
• Stanford J (2017) The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. Econom. Labour Relations Rev. 28(3):382–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoner CR (1989) The foundation of business ethics: Exploring the relationship between organization culture, moral values, and actions. S.A.M. Adv. Management J. 54(3):38–43.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2016) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment & the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tabak F, Smith WP (2005) Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities Rights J. 17:173–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Inter-group Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS (2010) Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 95(4):769–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine S, Godkin L, Lucero M (2002) Ethical context, organizational commitment, and person-organization Fit. J. Bus. Ethics 41:349–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vardi Y, Wiener Y (1996) Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organ. Sci. 7(2):151–165.Link, Google Scholar
• Whitley BE Jr, Nelson AB, Jones CJ (1999) Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 41:657–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Raghuram S, Garud R (1999) Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ. Sci. 10(6):777–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Raghuram S, Garud R (2001) Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. J. Management 27(2):213–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth SS (2011) Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):157–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth SS, Bennett V, Pierce L (2013) Doing as they would do: How the perceived ethical preferences of third-party beneficiaries impact ethical decision-making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(2):280–290.Crossref, Google Scholar